Counter-Hegemony And Cultural Appropriation

1098 Words3 Pages

Essay: Counter-Hegemony and Cultural Appropriation
Imaan Shah
25th June 2015
QVC1104

Cultural Appropriation and Sexual Innuendos in Advertisements

Cultural Appropriation: “Cultural appropriation is the adoption of elements of one culture by members of a different cultural group, especially if the adoption is of an oppressed people's cultural elements by members of the dominant culture” - Eden Caceda[1]

Cultural appropriation is a recent norm that has now become common place in society. Due to the globalisation of media and the free access to information via television, public broadcasting, and the internet, different aspects from worldly cultures have now been used in fashion trends, music and film. By ‘adopting’ these aspects, it is …show more content…

When a dominating or ‘more powerful’ culture steals elements from a minority, they have the ability to manipulate and mistreat it. By manifesting it as their own ideas about that culture, it can ‘erase’ and warp the originality of the minority or ‘less powerful’ culture.[3]

Image 1[4] - A ceremonial Native American feathered warbonnet is worn by a white model during a lingerie fashion show, purely for ‘decorative’ and costume purposes. No consideration has been taken by wearing this attire, in terms of the history that the Native Americans were subject to by the White colonialists. Counter-hegemony, cultural appropriation and generalisation can be seen in advertising, by wording and visual representations. The following example harnesses the power of sexual or pornographic elements to sell milk. There, however, is a subtle underlining of religious iconography and reference that has been manipulated as a sexual innuendos, as a means to sell their goods.

Image 2[5] - A Finnish advertisement for ‘Valio’, a dairy products …show more content…

The advertisements both contain the symbolism of the milk squirted in the face, but it is used as a sexual (and pornographic) innuendo and has connotations to semen being ejaculated into a woman’s face.i Image 4[7] - “Nursing Madonna” or “The Miraculous Lactation of St Bernard” by Alonso Cano in 1650.

This is an image portraying St Bernard being quenched of his thirst by the lactating Virgin Mary. This image was painted in reverence to the Madonna and the ‘miracle’ that St Bernard experienced. She appears to him after he had prayed to her and asked her to reveal herself to him. The myth is that she squirted either in his mouth (quenching him of thirst) or into his eye, curing him of an eye infection. This is a variant depiction of ‘miracle’, as there are many theories surrounding this biblical anecdote.

This image was the original artwork from which the advertisements have taken or ‘borrowed’ the element of the ‘milk being squirted on to their face’, and thus is considered cultural appropriation. There is no intended sexual innuendo with the artwork as there is in Image 2 and Image 3 (although there has been speculation), and the source from which the milk is coming from is visually

More about Counter-Hegemony And Cultural Appropriation

Open Document