Cost Effectiveness Analysis In Health

1862 Words4 Pages

Introduction
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a form of economic analysis that compares the relative costs and outcomes/effects of two or more scenarios. The CEA is typically expressed as a ratio, where the denominator is a gain in health using a natural unit of measurement (years of life, cases of flu prevented, etc.) and the numerator is the cost associated with that health gain.
Most clinical studies express gains in health in terms of disease-specific measures, such as number of heart attacks avoided or cases of influenza prevented. Although this is useful for particular treatments related to those health conditions, those measures do not allow for comparison across diseases. To solve this, the concept of quality-adjusted life years
The National Health Service (NHS) provides preventive medicine, primary care, and hospital services, and UK residents can use NHS health care for essentially nothing except for some co-payments for prescriptions and dental care. Alternatively, the national programs in the US are Medicare, Medicaid, and programs that cover military veterans and federal government employees. A large proportion of people have private insurance through their employer. While some private insurers in the US have imposed CEA rules, cost per QALY is a mandated decision-making tool concerning coverage and reimbursement in the
In the past CEA has shown that it should have a place in our discourse, such as showing that prevention programs typically do not produce cost savings and that high-tech interventions can provide good value for the money spent (Neumann, 2004).
CEA proponents believe that the country’s increased health care spending and desire for the best in medical technology will eventually force us to strongly consider using CEA as a possible solution to our problems. Perhaps a middle ground would be to use CEA as one tool of many when it comes to health policymaking. It does provide a tool to inform decision making in a clear, explicit way. In addition to the many countries that use CEA, medical journals here in the US routinely publish them. CEA would be able to help managed care organizations, insurers, and policy makers make informed decisions. Supporters are optimistic that the increased involvement by the federal government in comparative effectiveness research will eventually lead to increased acceptance and the use of QALYS as a

Open Document