Corporations, presently, are legal citizens in the United States. This legal citizenship guarantees all Corporations many of the legal rights that natural born citizens can enjoy with limited consequences for their actions. Presently since the law sees Corporations as “artificial citizens” many of the punishments for crimes committed by a Corporation are essentially null and void since these entities cannot cordially be punished for committing a crime as a physically living human can.
Firstly before delving into the complex interwoven legalities of Corporations it is imperative to know what a Corporation is and what separates it from another form of business i.e. a partnership, trust or a hybrid of both. The main difference between a Corporation and every other business type is that a Corporation is a legal entity that is independant from the people that own it (shareholders) and the people that control it (Board of Directors). Essentially a Corporation is a separate entity that can be taxed, enter contracts, collect debt, and conduct business separate from its owners. Another major difference is that when the owners of the Corporation die the company does not dissolve since it is separate from its shareholders/owners.
Though in order to be listed as an American Corporation the business must first meet a list of requirements. These requirements are that the company must have a quorum, 75 percent, of American investors, directors, and the CEO must be a citizen of the U.S. (United States Code: Title 46a,802. Corporation, Partnership, or Association as Citizen | LII / Legal Information Institute). These requirements are fairly easy for a business to attain and maintain.
A prime example of a Corporation eluding the law and its pu...
... middle of paper ...
...The Policy Institute. N.p., 20 Nov. 2012. Web. 06 May 2014. www.thepolicyinstitute.org/>. Clark, Josh. "Why do corporations have the same rights as you?" How Stuff Works. How Stuff
Works, 01 April 2008. Web. 07 May 2014.
-person.htm>.
"United States Code: Title 46a,802. Corporation, Partnership, or Association as Citizen | LII / Legal
Information Institute." United States Code: Title 46a,802. Corporation, Partnership, or Association as Citizen | LII / Legal Information Institute. United States of America, n.d. Web. 08 May 2014.
00000802----000-.html>.
"U.S. Food and Drug Administration." Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. United States
Food and Drug Administration, n.d. Web. 08 May 2014.
ecalls/default.htm>.
Corporation – “A business organization that exists as a legal entity and provides limited liability to its owners.” (Longenecker, Petty, Palich, Hoy, Pg. 205) The main advantage of a corporation is that the business liability falls onto this entity instead of the individuals that own it. The disadvantages of this organization are found mostly in its formation. A corporation is expensive to create and requires compliance with state
The intended audience for the document is the lawmakers and people who execute laws at the US Industrial Commission.
California. The organization is a non-profit making organization whose members have vast knowledge in criminal law. The organization was in support of the petitioner against the California state.
Just like people, corporations have the capability of committing criminal acts. The Enron scandal in 2001; the Bernard Madoff ponzi-scheme of 2008-2009; both of these examples show that despite internal and external controls, regulations, and oversight, corporations still are a multi-faceted entity that have the propensity to partake in crime. That being true, that criminal entity must be punished and held responsible for their actions. One tool in the prosecutorial tool belt is the use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements. According to Lanny Breuer, the United States Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, “over the last decade, deferred prosecution agreements have become a mainstay of white collar criminal law enforcement” (Warin, 2012).
Aside from threatening our freedom, ignoring the differences between personal and corporate privacy results in unusual conclusions. We often make a clear distinction between general corporate rights and personal rights, because they have different meanings and purposes in different contexts. And we rightfully treat humans and corporations differently. For example, individual and corporate taxes are not one in the same. Unlike most individuals, corporations end up saving money each year when it comes to taxation, as Catherine Rampell points out in her opinion article, “Corporations are people. So what if people were corporations?” But in recent years, the United States has accorded corporations more rights on the grounds that they are, in a
And An Administrative Law Solution.” Tulane Law Review 87.2 (2012): 427-455. Academic Search Complete. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.
Which of the rules of AICPA Code of Conduct is most related section 5062.2 of the California Accountancy Act? Explain your
So, what exactly is a corporation’s responsibility? Much will depend on who you’re talking to, but
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
[7] Section 25 voluntary of the C (S) A 1995 to section 73 (4) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 U.S.C.)
The Principle of Separate Corporate Personality The principle of separate corporate personality has been firmly established in the common law since the decision in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd[1], whereby a corporation has a separate legal personality, rights and obligations totally distinct from those of its shareholders. Legislation and courts nevertheless sometimes "pierce the corporate veil" so as to hold the shareholders personally liable for the liabilities of the corporation. Courts may also "lift the corporate veil", in the conflict of laws in order to determine who actually controls the corporation, and thus to ascertain the corporation's true contacts, and closest and most real connection. Throughout the course of this assignment I will begin by explaining the concept of legal personality and describe the veil of incorporation. I will give examples of when the veil of incorporation can be lifted by the courts and statuary provisions such as s.24 CA 1985 and incorporate the varying views of judges as to when the veil can be lifted.
According to Corporation Act 2001 s124(1), it illustrates that ‘’A company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual both in and outside the jurisdiction” . As it were, company as a legal individual must be freely with all its capital contribution shall embrace liability for its legal actions and obligations of the company’s shareholders is limited to its investment to the company. This ‘separate legal entity’ principle was established in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1987] as company was held to have conducted the business as a legal person and separate from its members. It demonstrated that the debt of company is belonged to the company but not to the shareholders. Shareholders have only right to participate in managing but not in sharing the company property. Besides ,the Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1925] demonstrates that the distinction between the shareholders and company assets. It means that even Mr Macaura owned almost all the shares in the company, he had no insurable interest in the company’s asset. The other recent case is the Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1961] which illustrates that the distinct legal entities between employee ad director allows Mr.Lee function in dual capacities. It resulted that the corporation can contract with the controlling member of the corporation.
When we look at the laws that have been broken by so many of the top named corporations, I see why they continue to operate in the capacity that they do. When you take in to account the amount of money taken in for overall profits each year versus the fines levied “if” they are caught breaking the law I can see why they take their chances at being caught or not. Although the fines given are typically large amounts, they really are a mere slap on the wrist when compared to the money earned each
According to Carol Padgett (2012, 1), “companies are important part of our daily lives…in today’s economy, we are bound together through a myriad of relationships with companies”. The board of directors remain the highest echelon of management in any company. It is the “group of executive and non-executive directors which forms corporate strategy and is responsible for monitoring performance on the behalf of shareholders” (Padgett, 2012:1). Boards are clearly critical to the operation of companies and they are endowed with substantial power in the statute (Companies Act, 2014). The board is responsible for directing and steering the company. The board accomplishes this by business planning and risk management through proper corporate governance.