Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
important of copyright law
essays on laws about copyrights
important of copyright law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: important of copyright law
“An Act Of Encouragement of Learning” , these words from the Statute of Anne, the first ever copyright law enacted in 1710, best describe what should be the spirit of copyright laws in any country. These laws must protect the creators of different works to ensure “the encouragement of learned men to compose”. On the other hand there is also a need to ensure that these laws do not become a hurdle in the growth of new ideas. The attempt to maintain a balance between the above mentioned aspects has led to a long standing debate, heightened by the exponential boom in technology in recent years. This paper aims at analysing the different sections as well as the essence of copyright laws in Hong Kong and discussing whether or not they succeed in protecting the rights of owners while promoting creativity at the same time.
Copyright laws in Hong Kong have multiple facets. One is regarding the ownership of copyright works. This section defines who the owner is in case of different copyright works, like the producer for sound recordings or the author for literary works etc. This section also goes into details about what must be done in cases of exceptions. One such exception is commissioned work where even though the ownership is determined through a contract the commissioner has “ the power to restrain any exploitation of the commissioned work for any purpose against which he could reasonably take objection.” This attention to detail and attempt to cover all possibilities is commendable as it tries to look out for the interests of all parties involved in the creation of a work. The duration of copyright extends to fifty years after the death of the copyright owner. This not only covers the lifetime of the owner but also his next generat...
... middle of paper ...
...asic copyright law even browsing on the internet can be construed as infringement because a local copy gets saved in the history of the computer while browsing. However s65 allows for incidental copying while browsing the internet. Similar amendments tailor-made for the internet must be introduced in the law.
Secondary infringement under Hong Kong’s Copyright Ordinance states that even if the accused did not get any commercial benefits from the infringement he/she will face the same criminal consequences as someone who did gain commercial benefits from the infringement. This I believe is harsh and to an extent unfair. Even though in both scenarios the infringers would have committed an offence and must be held liable I strongly feel that since in the previous case there commercial benefit reaped from the infringement the consequent punishment must also be lesser.
South China Morning Post (2014). Many routes to allowing parodies within Hong Kong's copyright law | South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1400778/many-routes-allowing-parodies-within-hong-kongs-copyright
As many users see P2P software as just file sharing, entertainment industries and other big companies see it as copyright infringement and stealing from copyright owners without their rightful authorization or compensation. These companies complain that P2P file sharing threatens the survival of the industries and believe that there should be a law passed to protect the livelihood of the copyright holders.
The NSW Criminal Justice System is adequate when dealing with young offenders; however, like any legal system it does have its limitations. The NSW Criminal justice system does uphold the rights of the young offender by providing juveniles with special courts under the Childrens Court Act 1987 (NSW) by providing special protections under the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child; the recognising of culpability in regards to the age of the young offender by implementing doli incapax and by arranging a variety of diversionary programs and alternative punishments. However, the limitations of the NSW Criminal justice system in relation to young offenders is Doli Incapax in the The Childrens (Criminal Proceedings Act 1987) NSW which fails to recognise more serious offenders and The Young Offenders Act allowance for youth justice conferencing is not being cultivated for a wide enough range of offenders, leading the exclusion of some young offenders from the benefits that conferencing can offer.
With the boom of technology in China and the new capitalism ideas, China also has a huge piracy problem. According to the International Intellectual Property Alliance's 2003 report on China, the piracy problem in China creates $1.85 billion in 2002 alone with 90% piracy rates for all copyrighted materials.5 This piracy problem affects negatively on China's global relations and economic improvements. China's current copyright laws are still in its teenage years, and the fast pace of technological advancement isn't helping either.
Along with the development of a file format (MP3) to store digital audio recordings, came one of the new millennium’s most continuous debates – peer-to-peer piracy – file sharing. Internet companies such as Napster and Grokster became involved in notable legal cases in regards to copyright laws in cyberspace. These two cases are similar in nature, yet decidedly different. In order to understand the differences and similarities, one should have an understanding of each case as well as the court’s ruling.
Whereas Rose advocated better policing practices and improved copyright legislation, Dyson proposed that the de facto legalization of content duplication would nullify copyright law, resulting in a service-based economy with little copyright law. While this economic and legal evolution will continue for years to come, it is this author's opinion that Dyson's model of change seems much more likely based on events and trends over the past six years.
The Statute of Anne (the first modern form of copyright law) was introduced after the printing press was invented. Before this time, books would have to be hand written and for this reason they were ve...
Intellectual property rights are normally regional; each region abides by different laws (YU, 2012). Still the software copyright holders can’t attain the patent protection worldwide. As a substitute they obtain the patent rights in each region or country they want to sell these works or products (YU, 2012). This paper will outline what Justification and rights that are obtained and how strong of a defence can be enforced in conjunction with the variations of the Intellectual property rights in each region and country. There are differences in policies and laws, the copyright holder will still try to prevent their products or works from being sold in the black market. Furthermore this paper will be discussing the salient features of the copyright and related rights act 2000 that supports this case on Intellectual property rights for each region and if it is opened to debate as to what laws are enforced to protect these rights from being copied and displayed on the internet, and how they can so be restricted to a certain region for the products and works to function. There are ways around these restrictions by modifying and changing its settings. Intellectual property rights haven’t been an issue till lately (nineteenth century) it’s difficult to establish the grounds on how to deal with it, which can be implied with the agreement on trade-related aspects.
Physical piracy-the copying and illegal sale of hard-copy CDs, videotapes, and DVDs-costs the music industry over $4 billion a year worldwide and the movie industry more than $3.5 billion. These numbers do not factor in the growing (and difficult to measure) problem of Internet piracy, in which music and movies are transferred to digital format and copies are made of the resulting computer file. Journalist Charles C. Mann explains why Internet piracy has the potential to be vastly more damaging to copyright industr...
In its simplest terms, copyright is the U.S. government’s way of protecting the rights of anyone creating an original work, such as a play, song, poem, book, or artwork. Only the work’s original author or creator can make copies, distribute, sell, perform or adapt that work. Originally passed into law 35 years ago, the Copyright Act of 1976 has undergone many changes in the wake of advancing technology, including such changes as categorizing any work on the Internet as “published” (Copyright Act of 1976). Of
Copyright infringement is a major issue with media ethics. Many people confuse copyright infringement with trademark infringement (Miller, 2012). However, copyright infringement is when someone unlawfully uses a particular work that is protected by copyright law. These works can include: movies, pictures, songs, albums, artwork, pieces of literature, and newspapers. There is no reason for any of the previous to be copyright infringed, because there are ways to correctly cite all of them as sources, without illegally copyright infringing them. Most people simply do not use their resources to help them with their citing.
The New South Wales Criminal trial and sentencing process is adequate in balancing the rights of the victims, offenders and society however like any legal system is does have its faults. The options in the trial and sentencing process are stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, the Crimes (Sentencing Legislation) Amendment (Intensive Correction Orders) Act 2010 and the Crimes (sentencing procedure) Act 1999 which features the use of charge negotiation, rehabilitation, mitigating factors and intensive corrective orders.
Intellectual property is information, original ideas and expressions of the persons mind that have profitable value and are protected under copyright, patent, service mark, trademark/trade secret regulation from replication, violation, and dilution. Intellectual property includes brand items, formulas, inventions, data, designs and the work of artists. It is one of the most tradable properties in the technology market.
These laws work to differentiate the works that require protection, what needs to be protected and what form of usage can be permitted without a license. Proper enforcement of laws to combat piracy is required so that all stakeholders, regardless of them being the user or the creator can benefit from this protection.
The first reason why downloading and uploading copyrighted materials from the Internet should be legal is that downloading copyrighted materials positively affects the economy. The European Commission Joint Research Center reported that the profits of music companies would be 2% lower if uploading and downloading copyrighted materials were banned. However, music companies are able to acquire more profits despite illegal downloading because many people tend to purchase CDs or DVDs after watching or listening to copyrighted materials for free. Moreover, the research showed that people who download music illegally spent more money to buy music than people who did not download illegally. In addition, research conducted by the Swiss government informed that one-third of Swiss people downloaded copyrighted materials from the Internet because personal use of copyrighted materials is legal in Switzerland. Even though there is a fact that many people can download copyrighted materials from the Internet legally in Switzerland, the amount of money that people spend to buy copyrighted materials is not f...