Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
reproductive technology including bioethics
assisted reproductive technology thesis
reproductive technology including bioethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: reproductive technology including bioethics
Controversial Analysis
Technological developments occur every day, from medicine to medical techniques to preventive screenings, that assist in making each generation healthier than the ones that came before it. In the medical field, specifically in genetics, research into DNA modifications to remove diseases is advancing at an immense rate. Conventionally during most prenatal health appointments, women who are pregnant have the option to undergo prenatal screenings to find out if the future child is healthy, but in the last few decades testing for genetic mutations in the future child has become possible and more popular. However, not everybody sees this as a morally right act. Countless debates and questions have been sparked over the subject
…show more content…
All parents want their children to be healthy and live an amazing life, but what if you know your child won’t be born healthy and might not live for that long? Do you try to enjoy the time you will have with your child or do you start over and try again? These questions are what some couples must face if the tests show a disability in the fetus. For some women and couples, the decision to have the baby or not is an easy choice, but for others, it’s one of the hardest decisions they have ever made. There have been scenarios where a woman gets an abortion and regrets it for the rest of their life, but there have also been scenarios where a woman’s test comes back positive for a disability but she goes through with the pregnancy anyways and the child passed away less than a week after. Although the new screening tests are highly accurate and noninvasive (Peter Wieacker and Johannes Steinhard), there has been instances where a test came back positive for a disability and the child was born healthy. In an article by Susan Donaldson James on NBC News, a couple is featured that has a healthy 6-month old son that almost got aborted due to a prenatal test that was wrong. The test revealed that the fetus had Trisomy 18 and the doctor told the couple to prepare for the worst (James). Since there is a slight chance of the test being inaccurate one reason why …show more content…
There has been a multitude of scientific advancements over the past few decades in order to make prenatal testing and selective abortion an option available for those who want it, and many more scientific advancements are still to come in order to create a safer, less harmful procedure for the bearer of the child. Modern science has completed amazing research into prenatal testing and selective abortion that seemed impossible a decade ago. However, the fact still remains that not everybody believes prenatal testing and selective abortion is ethically the right decision to make and that is why it will continue to remain an extremely controversial topic that will be debated about for a long time to come. This controversy will continue to ensue and it will be difficult to come to a complete understanding on this issue, since each person has their own right to what they want to do with their own body, and that is one of the biggest reasons why this controversy is here to
Many people are familiar with the term abortion and its popular controversy in society today. Anyone who is familiar with the term should also be familiar with the two groups that form the controversy of abortion: pro-life and pro-choice. The article I chose is written by Terry O’Neill and is titled, “Legal Abortion Can Be a Lifeline”. The article was published on January 22, 2013, to U.S. News. It argues that abortion saves lives rather than taking them. O’Neill’s claim “abortion is a lifeline” rests upon the questionable assumption that a baby inside a womb is not considered life.
In the article Abortion As a Blessing, Grace, or Gift-A Renewed Conversation about Reproductive Rights by Valerie Trico, the author discussed different arguments pro-life advocates say about abortion. The author cites “Abortion is immoral. God hates abortion”. According to Tarico, is more immoral and irresponsible to bring a child into the world under “bad circumstances” such rape, teen pregnancies and unwanted pregnancies, where possibilities of success in life would be limited. According to the author abortion is a “sacred gift or blessing” that enables women to choose when to bring a child into this world, which at the same time will help their children to “flourish”. Tarico says that Planned Parenthood is a very important step that could prevent as much as “half of abortions in the future”. Tarico concludes that babies have the “right to be truly loved and wanted” and that parents should bring them into this world “when they’re fully ready to welcome them with open arms. In my opinion the author is right in pointing out that unplanned
Abortion has been a perplexing and controversial debate throughout time. There are many articles and philosophers who state their strong polarized opinions on whether it is ethical to have an abortion. Some people believe that abortion is morally unacceptable and under no circumstances will it ever be acceptable. On the contrary, other people believe that a woman should have the right to choose whether she wants to continue with the pregnancy, especially under certain conditions. In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thomson uses real-life analogies to illustrate her key argument that, even assuming a fetus is considered a person from the moment of conception, the mother and the fetus have an equal right to life. Thomson believes that the human fetus doesn’t have the right to occupy a woman’s body for survival, if it against her will. Thomson argues that, even if we grant that the fetus has the right to life, abortion would still be morally permissible in cases of rape, dangerous pregnancy or contraceptive failure. In this essay, I will argue that even if the fetus has the right to life, abortion, is still morally acceptable in the case of ectopic pregnancy, rape and contraceptive failure, as the fetus doesn’t have the right to use a woman’s body without her consent or if it endangers her.
Abortion has become increasingly common in America, even though many people such as antiabortionists are against it. The contradicting views concerning abortion are disparate and continual. Republicans’ and Democrats go head-to-head in heated debates over the topic of abortion. Arguments regarding anti-abortion and pro-abortion are addressed in two different perspectives, which “generally boils down to the question of whether the individual wants to see abortion banned” (Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice. (n.d.). The topic of abortion can be very touchy and controversial for many people to talk about. The supporting and opposing arguments regarding abortion must be explained in order to determine if it is humane or inhumane. Abortion on the other hand
Abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. Many people believe it is immoral and even consider it to be murder. The definition of abortion is; “The termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to being capable of normal growth.” 1 These pro-life believers do not support the idea of induced abortion and believe it should be illegal. Many of these supporters do not know that if abortion were illegal they would still be performed, unfortunately by an uneducated staffs. Over 70 thousand maternal deaths occur every year because of unsafe abortions1. These women die, so the idea of supporting pro-life is contradictory, this is why the nation should be pro-choice.
Many things are changing at an extremely rapid rate in our society. The new advances in the areas of science and biotechnology are raising many ethical and moral dilemmas for everyone. No one will be left unaffected. Everyone will have to make a decision and take a stand on these issues. I will discuss advancements of genetic screening and testing. The first step to any ethical problem is to understand the topic. It is difficult to formulate accurate ideas without knowledge about the topic, so first I will provide a little background information on genetic screening. I will then point out some of the areas of controversy associated with genetic screening, and finally I will discuss my view on the topic.
One of these issues is the moral and ethical issue of genetic testing. Genetic testing is a controversial topic that affects patients, fetus to adult. For the sake of keeping this article from being too broad, I will focus on prenatal and fetal genetic testing. Proponents of genetic testing argue that it is a form of preventative medicine, allowing the parents to be prepared or make decisions about a child before the child is born. They may point out that with knowledge of defects or disabilities while child is in utero, medical staff can be ready to act immediately at birth to save the infants life. Place states that genetic testing gives prospective parents a choice in having a child with a disability or birth defect (as cited in Farrelly, et al., 2012). Malik points out that
Defined as ‘’abortion (also called induced abortion) is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy by surgical or medical (with drugs) means. The unintentional termination of a pregnancy (due to medical disorder or injury) is known as a spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage.,’’ (Vaughn, 2010 p. 161) Abortion has been the source of the considerable debate for many years. Most people have a strong feeling towards one way or another. The fight between pro-life and pro-choice most people believe in one of the two things; either they believe it is an immoral act to kill a baby regardless of the situation and the prescribe to the pro-life plate form or they believe it is a women’s body and therefore, she has the right to do what she wants with it.
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
The media and the reader are some of the main reasons for the perpetuation of misinformation with the abortion topic. Abortion is a huge controversial topic that is challenging the human nature of the public. With abortion, the problem is you can either be for or against abortion, pro-life or pro-choice, there is no “in between”. There is only two sides and both have major issues with the other side. The sources used are “Why Pro-Life World Has A Lot of Dead Women In It”, “The Rights of A Woman Does Not Outweigh The Rights of A Child”, and “Abortion”. The reader must work together with the media to eliminate bias in an attempt to prevent the perpetuation of misinformation. In the source “Why Pro-Life World Has A Lot of Dead Women in It”, it
Genetic testing, also known as screening, is a rapidly advancing new scientific field that can potentially revolutionize not only the world of medicine, but many aspects of our lives. Genetic screening is the sequencing of human DNA in order to discover genetic differences, anomalies, or mutations that may prove pathological. As genetic screening becomes more advanced and easily accessible, it presents society with difficult questions that must be asked about the boundaries of science and to what degree we are allowed to tamper with the human genome. To better understand the potential impact of genetic screening on our society, we must examine the potential benefits in comparison to the possible negative impact it may cause. With this knowledge in hand, we can examine what the future holds for this field of study and the best possible direction to take.
Genetic testing has become a highly controversial issue among both the general population and the scientific community. It is a process that exposes a person’s entire genome sequence, allowing it to be read and evaluated to identify potential risks for genetic diseases or diseases that could be passed onto offspring (Holt Productions, 2012). With thousands of genetic tests already being used, and more being established, it seems logical to put this growing technology to use. Some agree that it is a person’s right to know and understand his or her genetic makeup. However, others argue that, despite the benefits of genetic testing, caution should be used to carefully inspect the risks associated with this new technology.
Genetic Testing is a very helpful and useful tool for the world today. There and many pros and many cons to each test. In this paper the discussion is the pros and cons of preimplantation testing, newborn screening, and breast cancer genetic testing. Many different tests are used today ranging from before conception of a fetus all the way to adulthood and that is how much medicine had developed over the last few hundred years. Most people think these test are miracles and gifts however there are some people that disagree entirely with the whole concept of messing with the fate of each person. Preimplantation, newborn screening, and breast cancer testing all have pros consist of the helpful ways to stop things from happening in the future. However
Imagine for a minute that you and your husband have been faithfully trying to have a child. After several attempts, you are successful. A small being finally begins blooming inside of you. After nearly three months of pregnancy, you go to your doctor for the regular checkup to test the current development of the baby. The doctor explains to you that there is a new screening test that is being done to more accurately test the developing fetus’ health. This test determines whether the baby will be born with a disability, disease or some other type of impairment. She states it is very common, accurate and safe. Being the young, loving, nervous parents that you are, agree to it. What harm can it do? If the test comes back positive for a disorder, however, such as Down syndrome, you are left to make a very difficult situation. Will you carry the baby to term, even though he will be born unhealthy or do you abort the fetus, therefore saving it from a life of pain? Many couples are in this same exact boat, and most of