Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Five forms of organizational structure
Five forms of organizational structure
Analysis of contagion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Five forms of organizational structure
In this assignment I shall discuss three theories explaining structure choice; management choice, population ecology theory and contingency theory including their strengths and weaknesses. I shall outline and compare functional and team structures as they are the two greatest opposites, using sources to support or disprove statements. Comparisons will then be made between centralised and decentralised structures, commenting on how they relate to the contingencies outlined by the contingency theory whilst also taking into account related issues such as motivation and competitiveness. I shall then decide which theories I support and which structure type I feel is stronger.
There are three main theories which aim to explain which structure; functional, divisional, matrix, team or network, even possibly a mixture that will best suit a company. Firstly, the management choice theory highlights the influence of managers and the fact that they make the final decision, thus believing that management will select a structure which reflects their perspectives and needs and not those of the organisation. For example a “bureaucratic” manager, as proposed by Weber, will enforce a centralised structure incorporating strict rules and procedures paying less attention to the factors proposed by the contingency theory. However the theory does acknowledge that contingencies, outlined by the contingency theory, do limit the options available to managers.
Secondly the less mainstream population ecology theory, resembling Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, Hannan and Freeman (1977, pp929-964) and Aldrich (1979, pp265), also partially acknowledge the contingency theory as they recognise adaptation does take place. Yet they dispute the suggestio...
... middle of paper ...
...n Systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Smith, A (1776) An Inquiry into the nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: Methuen and Co. Ltd. Cited in Hannagen, T. (2004) Management, 2nd edition, Gosport: Pearson Education Ltd
• Woodward, J. (1958) Management and Technology, London: HMSO
Bibliography:
• Ashby, R. (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics, New York: John Wiley cited in Naylor, J. (2004) Management, Second edition, Gosport, Pearson Education Ltd
• Handbook of Organisational Change. Online, available at:
http://books.google.com/books?id=SEeFyb6s7mcC&pg=PA137&lpg=PA137&dq=hannan+and+freeman+1977&source=web&ots=4tiYGSi7Pu&sig=_nGWoV4tEiBEDhNlLY9dfeFZX6I (accessed on 19th February 2008)
• Strategy: Definitions and Meanings. Online, available at: http://home.att.net/~nickols/strategy_definition.htm (accessed on 17th February 2008)
Top-level managers in bureaucratic organizational structures exercise a great deal of control over organizational strategy decisions, which is ideal for business owners with a command and control style. As for the disadvantages, bureaucratic structures can discourage creativity and innovation throughout the organization. No matter how ingenious a business owner is, it is virtually impossible for a single individual to generate the range of strategic ideas possible in a large, interdisciplinary
Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (London: 1776), 190-91, 235-37.
The second of Tinbergen’s questions Phylogeny looks at the evolutionary explanations of development, as opposed to just how behaviour has adapted, including mutations in response to environmental changes. Some of these mutations remain in species even after necessity has gone, and can influence future characteristics of that species. The third of Tinbergen’s questions looks at Causation,...
Smith's Influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who bases it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was...
"Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .
Smith, Adam. "CHAPTER XI OF THE RENT OF LAND." An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976. 161. Print.
Darwin states that this struggle need not be competitive in nature and also entails a species’ efficiency at producing offspring. Natural selection works not as an active entity that seeks and exterminates species that are not suited for their environment; instead, it retains variations that heighten a species’ ability to dominate in the struggle for existence and discards those that are detrimental or useless to that species. Stephen J. Gould explains the case of r-selection in which a species’ chances of survival are most reliant on its ability to reproduce rapidly and not on its structure being ideally suited for its environment. Gould’s example shows the beneficial results of perceiving natural selection not as something that changes a species in accordance with its environment but as something that preserves characteristics beneficial in the s... ...
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo, and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches? The twentieth century has brought in a number of management theories which have helped shape our view of management in the present business environment.
Organizational structure can be defined as the “formal arrangement of jobs within an organization” (Robbins & Coulter, 2009, p. 185). Having a defined and unified structure helps employees work more efficiently. Jacques Kemp, former CEO of ING Insurance Asia/Pacific, realized this need early on in his role. The company had been performing well and recently acquired another insurance company to become “one of the largest life insurance companies in Asia-Pacific” (Schotter, 2006, p. 4). However, Kemp’s proactive personality led him to seek out ways to achieve more efficient coordination between the regional office and business units (Robbins & Coulter, 2009). Kemp noticed that “most business unit managers did not even know the current corporate standards” and he began searching for a way to manage the managers (Schotter, 2006, p. 5). ING Insurance Asia/Pacific’s organizational structure was mechanistic and fairly well structured, but for a company that had recently been involved in a major acquisition and was divided across 12 geographically dispersed markets there was a great need to tweak this structure to unify the company (Schotter, 2006). If I had been in Kemp’s position as CEO, I would have made modifications to the organizational chain of command, formalized business processes, and used technology to stimulate collaboration amongst the region to help this company overcome organizational design challenges.
Most organizations fall under one of three organizational designs: simple structure, bureaucracy and matrix structure. The organizational design of a company suggests who makes executive decisions and how they are enforced. The organizational design is typically decided based on the size of the company and market place.
In order for one to evaluate and identify with the diverse business structures, he/she must be aware of the meaning and standards that makes that structure. Various businesses functions in different ways as the world is full of technology and new structures, company cultures and new ways in which companies are run. In order to fully grasp the concepts of Organizational structure and culture in the movies, I will use the Movie Up in the Air and The Devil Wear Prada movies to analyze a business scenario from them.
Matrix structure is first introduced in the aerospace industry in the 1960s and become one of the popular organizational design options in today’s business and industry (Derven & Alexandria, 2010). Burns and Wholey (1993) poinited out that matrix structure were used in advertising agencies, aerospace firms, research and development laboratories, hospitals, government agencies, and universities. Matrix structure is the combination of two or more different structures and take the advantages of the pure functional structure and the product organizational structure (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 497). The employees in the matrix may have two bosses: their functional department managers and their product managers. For example, all engineers may be in one engineering department and report to an engineering manager, but these same engineers may be assigned to different projects and report to a project manager while working on that project. In many organizations, a matrix structure is implemented to address the requirement to do more with less and become more agile. The matrix structure, which focuses on horizontal as well as vertical management, has become more widespread as a result of globalization and the...
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
Business structure is a critical factor to determine a company 's success or failure. Generally, larger organization has a more complex organizational structure. In the case of H&M, they had adopted matrix structure, one of the traditional organizational structure, into their business. As shown in figure 1, range of functional groups is listed horizontally across the table and on the other is product/task with a manager taking control of each. The functional structure is divided
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.