Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Five elements of constructivist approach to teaching
Five elements of constructivist approach to teaching
Five elements of constructivist approach to teaching
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Five elements of constructivist approach to teaching
Considering student achievement based upon the classroom environment, research shows that teachers who use constructivism in their classrooms have students whose achievement is more significant than those who learn by using traditional methods. (Singh, Yager, Yutakom, Yager, & Ali, 2012) It has become vitally important in this age for students to construct knowledge and apply it to both social and scientific situations in the real world. Additionally, the job market has changed, and employers are looking for more in potential employees. There are numerous skills being sought after that center around independent problem solving, a skill that can be taught using a constructivist approach. (Lew, 2010)
Educators as a whole have begun to stray away from solely utilizing traditional teaching approaches as new technology and science concepts demand that teaching approaches change with the times. (Zeynup & Alipasa, 2012) Further, allowing students to take control of their own learning and explore their world is of more relevance to the students than a traditional approach. (Garbett, 2011) By using constructivism, students may see the relevance of the science concepts they are learning, which may in turn inspire interest in science itself. (Milner, Templin & Czerniak, 2011) By using a constructivist approach in science classrooms, the students may gain a deeper understanding of science concepts, and students may take that knowledge and apply it to their career paths, their community, and their world. (Yager, Lim & Yager, 2006)
Review of Literature
What is Constructivism
Over the past 25 years, multiple attempts and efforts have been made to reform and improve education, particularly in science, in the United States. (Singh et al....
... middle of paper ...
... a positive effect on the achievement of high school science students?
(2) Does constructivist teaching have an effect on high school students’ engagement in the science classroom?
Significance of the Study
This study will be significant as it will give education reformers insight into the areas of science education that are lacking, and it will also reveal why student enrollment in science classes declines as they move into high school. Education is in place to benefit the student, and a main aspect of constructivism is it allows teachers to develop problems for students to analyze that allow students to use prior knowledge to actively construct new knowledge, new opinions and new perspectives. (Zeynup & Alipasa, 2012) Overall, the study will give information about what can be done about science education to benefit the learner in the most positive way possible.
Constructivism is a dynamic process in which learners build new thoughts or ideas based on their present/past information, social connections, and inspiration influence the development. Sometime, constructivism is likewise frequently confused as a learning theory that forces adult learners to create another process. However, constructivism takes advantage of and triggers the adult learner intrinsic interest about the biosphere and how things work. Adult learners don 't rethink the wheel yet, rather, try to see how it turns, and how it works ("What is constructivism?"
Von Glaserfield (1990) acknowledged that constructivism means “knowledge is not passively received.” Piaget (1973) stated that students are not just “empty heads” that can be filled with facts from packaged curriculum that is given out my teachers. Constructivism does not depend on a standardized curriculum. Instead, it promotes using curriculum customized to the students’ prior knowledge. Also, it emphasizes real world problem solving, experiments, reasoning and communication (Au & Carrol , 1997). Constructivism gives students the power to make connections, reformulate ideas, and reach conclusions (Brewer & Daane, 2002). After school programs often focus on teac...
Powell, K. Kalina, C. (2009). Cognitive and Social Constructivism: Developing Tools for an Effective Classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/pqdweb?did=1937522441&Fmt=7&clientId=22212&RQT=309&VName=PQD. (Document ID: 1937522441).
The attitudes, beliefs and experiences of the student guide the intake of information, There are two forms of constructivism, social which is when others in a learner’s life put meaning to information. The students develop meaning and understanding on their own but depend on the interaction with classmate or teachers. Cognitive constructivism is the second form which is constructed by assimilation or accommodation. Assimilation is associated with a schema, whereas accommodation does not match the schema. The schema must be changed to accommodate this conflict. Activities are relevant to the learner and real world based. The weaknesses of constructivism are that experiences and attitudes vary with the learner. Constructivism is utilized when the learner takes control over their learning. Students have an understanding fo the importance of the problem, comprehend the relevance, and construct knowledge through their experiences. It tends to be more important to focus on the whole of the meaning rather than the individual
We live in a society that is rapidly changing and where we are becoming lifelong learners. A lifelong learner is someone with aspiration and ambition to improving knowledge and skills with a personal, social, work related and civic outlook. Constructivism is the theory of how a person constructs knowledge when new information presented and it combines with existing knowledge that one gains through experiences. In a review of the constructivism theory through a student’s view, teaching and learning are the implications through hand-on, experiential, collaboration, project-based or task based projects. Learning is a continuous active process of gaining knowledge through experiences and interactions within the world. Learning occurs when an individual encounters thoughtful challenges, naturally occurring or in a problem-solving activity. Most importantly, it is worth noting to state that learning is a social
Students in America have been lacking on science scores compared to the international scores from other countries. It is well-known that science can help move civilization to the next level, but it all starts in school.
Before this paper looks at why I lean toward a constructivist theory it is important that one understand what constructivism is. There are many differing views on what the precise definition of constructivism, however, it is generally accepted that constructivism is a theory that elucidates human learning as a dynamic attempt to create meaning in the world around us (Fritscher, 2008). That is to say learners construct meaning/knowledge as part of a process of making sense of their experience and the experiences of others (Rollocf, 2010). In order for the learners to be able to do this we as educators must follow the four basic criterions of constructivist teaching as set forth by Baviskar, Hartle, and Whitney (2009). Those criterions are: eliciting prior knowledge, creating cognitive dissonance, application of the knowledge with feedback, and reflection on learning. The goals of constructivist learning using the four criterion are to develop critical thinki...
Learning, “as an interpretive, recursive, building process by active learners”, interrelates with the physical and social world (Fosnot, 1996). “Assuming the role as ‘guide on the side’ requires teachers to step off the stage, relinquish some of their power, and release the textbooks to allow their students to be actively engaged and take some responsibility of their own learning” (WhiteClark, DiCarlo, & Gilchriest, 2008, p. 44). Furthermore, constructivism involves developing the student as a learner through cooperative learning, experimentation, and open-ended problems in which students learn on their own through active participation with concepts and principles (Kearsley,
In conclusion, chapter 2 of Developing Constructivist Early Childhood Curriculum, DeVries discuss many different characteristics of constructivist teaching. All of which promote an inquiry-based approach in classrooms. I think it’s extremely important to offer ample time to students to complete an interest. Also, to challenge them and cater to the student’s interests, but also our own interests as teachers. Overall, constructivist teachers are very successful and I hope to bring this type of work into my classroom in the
After being in class for just two weeks, I have already seen so many great ideas and have been given new insights on how science should be taught and why it is important. Science is different in its own way, and many students end up not liking it. This is not simply because of the material, but because they way it is being taught in schools. Science is seen as almost an afterthought, whenever it can be fitted in will suffice. The problem with this is that teachers then don’t spend time on their science lesson, it gets taken out if they need more time for something else, or it ends up just reading from a book or powerpoint and students taking notes.
When learning Mathematics through a constructivist approach, the students are able to build their own understandings of concepts and problems, actively constructing knowledge in relevant contexts, while the teacher supports this construction of knowledge. The focus is on the personal ways of understanding and the actual process, rather than the answers. Constructivist Mathematics instruction encourages “reflective thinking, higher-order learning skills, testing viability of ideas and seeking alternative views”. The learner also understands how this knowledge of particular mathematical concepts and rules are applicable to real life problems and situations. (ict site)
Making learning fun and engaging for students is an important part of being an educator. Giving students worksheets is not engaging. To help engage students, Beirne and Velsor suggest constructivism. This strategy allows students to actively take part in learning. It teaches students to learn whole concepts and not isolated facts. Constructivism builds on top of prior knowledge and experiences. Students construct their own meaning of what they are learning. (Beirne-Velsor, 2012, pg. 16-18). Hands-on activities are a fantastic
Although much research points to the urgency for school systems to include nature of science education (American Association for the Advancement of Science 1989, Department for Education, Welsh Office 1995, National Research Council [NRC] 1996), there still appears to be a need to provide teachers with the necessary tools, teaching resources, and pedagogies to more effectively teach NoS. As Collins et all. (2001)
Among many teaching styles and learning theories, there is one that is becoming more popular, the constructivist theory. The constructivist theory focuses on the way a person learns, a constructivist believes that the person will learn better when he/she is actively engaged. The person acts or views objects and events in their environment, in the process, this person then understands and learns from the object or events(P. Johnson, 2004). When we encounter a certain experience in our life, we think back to other things that have occurred in our life and use that to tackle this experience. In a lot of cases, we are creators of our own knowledge. In a classroom, the constructivist theory encourages more hands-on assignments or real-world situations, such as, experiments in science and math real-world problem solving. A constructivist teacher constantly checks up on the student, asking them to reflect what they are learning from this activity. The teacher should be keeping track on how they approached similar situations and help them build on that. The students can actually learning how to learn in a well-planned classroom. Many people look at this learning style as a spiral, the student is constantly learning from each new experience and their ideas become more complex and develop stronger abilities to integrate this information(P. Johnson, 2004). An example of a constructivist classroom would be, the student is in science class and everyone is asking questions, although the teacher knows the answer, instead of just giving it to them, she attempts to get the students to think through their knowledge and try to come up with a logical answer. A problem with this method of learning is that people believe that it is excusing the role of...
According to Trowbridge (2012), there is change in almost all fields of endeavor and in education particularly science education at the secondary level. For this matter leading educators and scholars here and abroad agree that the traditional way of teaching science at the secondary level is inadequate in content, purpose, emphasis and approach.