Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument essays
Main features of argumentative essay
Argument essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument essays
In the articles “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” and“Executions Should Be Televised”, the modes of discourse make an effective argument for the former and an ineffective argument for the latter. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, there is an example of exposition. Being more precise, it is an example of cause and effect in the tenth paragraph. Nicholas Carr, the author of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” talks about Friedrich Nietzsche, a man who was going blind. In 1882, Nietzsche bought a typewriter, which significantly helped him. He learned how to type based on touch and could, once again, write. This is cause and effect as Nietzsche buying a typewriter, the cause in this situation, and saving his ability to see and write. Some would …show more content…
Carr states “the internet is a machine designed for the efficient and automated collection, transmission, and manipulation of information”. He is explaining how something works, which is what process analysis demonstrates. On top of that, Carr also uses connotative language to give off a tone that the computers are unpleasant, especially with the word manipulation. Overall, this article effectively uses exposition to make the argument more effective. Throughout the article, Carr expresses his distaste for how much people rely on computers and artificial intelligence. With the first example, he shows how computers can be used to benefit the human race, but, as the article goes on, he uses words as he did in the second example to show that there can be too much of a good thing and that people are beginning to depend on fake intelligence a little too …show more content…
As stated by Shemtob and Lat, “We respectfully disagree. Executions in the United States ought to be made public.” This is persuasion as it tries to tell a person about a specific thing by using a belief, not something based in completely unbiased fact. That comes in later, during paragraph twelve. When “because a jury found that his crimes were so heinous that he deserved to die”, this is an argument, which, as stated before, uses facts. The fact is the jury found this guy to have done some horrible things that his death was necessary. One could argue that this is an example of persuasion as it is the jury’s opinion the man should die. Nevertheless, from the writer's point of view, it is fact that the jury made the decision and, therefore, it is a
This idea of a computer doing the ‘technical’ work can be useful to us, due to living in an age of technology which is something that can be useful to us, as our own brains are our ‘built in computer. It is also crucial in processing our thoughts about each of our own moral decisions of what is right and wrong.
Goldberg, David Theo. “If Technology Is Making Us Stupid, It’s Not Technology’s Fault.” Blog. Digital Humanities. August 16, 2010. Gooch and Suyler. in Argument. Avenue of the Americas, New York.2011. 301-03. Print.
...s well as to show the dangers of mind control. Crichton didn’t show bias, as he stated both the dangers of mind control and how people need mind control, otherwise we’d be “hopelessly lost without it” (Crichton, 227). He also shows both positive and negative views on technology and computers through his characters. Through Harry Benson, who believes machines will take over the world, shows how harmful certain scenarios could be if we tamper with technology too much; on the other hand, through characters like Gerhard and Richards, who love working with computers, show how beneficial computers are to humans. Gerhard makes a statement that computers never made mistakes, and that “they were never wrong...it always turned out, in the end, to be a human error” (Crichton, 97-98). I really like that Michael Crichton wasn’t biased, and how he showed both sides of the story.
Advancements in technology have strived to make life easier for so many people. In most cases, the advancements have achieved its goal, but in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr questions if the improvements in society have unintentionally hindered our thought process overall. Carr begins the article by providing personal instances when his concentration seemed to diminish due to the internet. He explains how he now loses interest when reading lengthy portions, his mind just can’t seem to remain connected to his readings. He then proceeds to talk about how today’s life is surrounded by the internet, and explains the pros and cons of it. The negative side of it is that his mind now wonders off when seeking information from
Finalist for the 2011 Pulitzer Prize, Nicholas Carr in his article, Is Google is making us stupid?, addresses his beliefs that the internet is creating artificial intelligence as it effects our mind and the way we think. Throughout the article Carr supports this claim with rhetorical devices as well as Aristotelian appeals. Carr begins by using pathos by stating an anecdote from a scene in the movie A Space Odyssey, then uses logos by stating factual evidence and statistics, lastly Carr uses ethos by conceding to opposition and stating appropriate vocabulary. In the article he compares the past and present and how the Internet has changed not only himself, but also people as a whole. In order to show his credibility, Carr uses research and
...ysterious technology. When referencing the new technology he states, “They supply the stuff for thought, but they also shape the process of thought” (6). Carr’s main point is the effect of technology, especially the Internet, is changing the programming of the brain.
From communicating with one another to researching for an essay, these high-tech gadgets are constantly being used. Unfortunately this is slowly becoming a danger to the human mind and an individual's ability to carry out simple tasks. This can be shown through the examples in Carr’s novel. He states multiple times that technology is damaging the brain and is struggling to do the simple tasks it should be able to do. Through his multiple examples, it is clear that technology is hurting us because we can no longer contemplate, concentrate, remember certain details, and more. Although, we cannot avoid using technology, we should be mindful of how often we use
“With every new innovation, cultural prophets bickered over whether we were facing a technological apocalypse or a utopia” (Thompson 9). This quote states that with every significant break-through with technology, people contemplate whether it will have a positive or negative effect on mankind. Technology allows for external memory sources, connections to databases, and it allow easy communication between people. Thompson then directly counters Carr’s hypothesis and states that “[c]ertainly, if we are intellectually lazy or prone to cheating and shortcuts, or if we simply don’t pay much attention to how our tools affect the way we work, then yes - we become… over reliant” (Thompson 18). In his opinion, “[s]o yes, when we’re augmenting ourselves, we can be smarter… But our digital tools can also leave us smarter even when we’re not actively using them” (Thompson
When it comes to the definition of technology in their articles, both Carr and Cascio have similarities and differences. Both authors are debating about the use of technology in today’s society. Both of their articles touch base on the ideals of “what technology is” in their perspectives. Carr believes that technology is making us want the quick path to information or common knowledge and says the Internet is “a machine designed for the efficient and automated collection, transmission, and manipulation of information”. Cascio also believes th...
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
As capitalism runs its course and develops new technologies, society is left to pick up the pieces and figure out where these new technologies will lead them. Ever since I learned to use the Internet as a child, I have become accustomed to seeing more and more fascinating technology developments that have changed the way I communicated as the years went by. Now that the Internet has infiltrated more aspects of human life, it has become necessary to reflect on how this critical juncture will continue to affect our society. In Digital Disconnect, Robert McChesney provides an analysis of the arguments that the celebrants and skeptics used to express their views of the Internet. McChesney then moves past these arguments to explain how the PEC plays a key role in determining the direction that the Internet is heading towards. By assessing McChesney’s views, I hope to develop my own interpretation of the Internet’s impact on society.
The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson.
Nicholas Carrs article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” makes points that I agree with, although I find his sources to be questionable. The article discusses the effects that the Internet may be having on our ability to focus, the difference in knowledge that we now have, and our reliance on the Internet. The points that are made throughout Carrs article are very thought provoking but his sources make them seem invaluable.
Within the movie, it can be seen that persuasive argument is employed by one single juror to help sway the majority to believe his analysis of the evidence presented. He sets on a course to reach out to each juror and improve their thinking by reasonable and justified persuasion. There were three points raised in the tri...
Since the beginning of time, humans have thought and made many inventions. Repeatedly the newer one is better than the older. Our minds have created many remarkable things, however the best invention we ever created is the computer. computers are constantly growing and becoming better every day. Every day computers are capable of doing new things. Even though computers have helped us a lot in our daily lives, many jobs have been lost because of it, now the computer can do all of the things a man can do in seconds! Everything in the world relies on computers and if a universal threat happens in which all computers just malfunction then we are doomed. Computers need to be programmed to be able to work or else it would just be a useless chunk of metal. And we humans need tools to be able to live; we program the computer and it could do a lot of necessary functions that have to be done. It is like a mutual effect between us and he computer (s01821169 1).