Once the last bullet was fired and the remaining slaves were freed, there arose a problem that was so big that the way the United States responded to it could alter race relations in the country for many years. The once thriving Southern economy under slavery had been completely ripped apart by the scars of war and it was up to the current president and congress to help restore it to its former state of economic prosperity. This period of American history is known as reconstruction and soon after the murder of Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson the vice president was thrust into the spotlight and he architected what is known as Presidential reconstruction. Raised in a relatively poor southern white household, Andrew Johnson developed a prejudice against newly freed African American’s because he saw them as a threat to poor Southern Whites, this was later revealed through his stubbornness in office, his economic policies and the laws he tried to pass in office.
President Johnson believed that the emancipation of blacks was the means to break down the planter aristocracy, not to empower blacks. He saw no reason to punish the South as losing their slaves and labor force was punishment enough. As our textbook notes, “Johnson’s views, combined with a lack of political savvy and skill, left him unable to work constructively with congressional Republicans, even the moderates who constituted the majority” Another reason Radical Reconstruction failed was because in the early 1870s, growing economic problems grew stronger as white Northerners became more irritated with the struggles to protect the rights of freed people, as Northerners felt they had done enough for black Southerners. As Hewitt and Lawson suggest, “More and more northern whites came to believe that any debt owed to black people for northern complicity in the sin of slavery had been wiped out by the blood shed during the Civil War.” This led the nation to shift from focusing on social matters to economic matters. A third reason why Radical Reconstruction failed was because focusing on social matters opened the door to legislation limiting the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. United States v. Cruikshank (1876), for example, ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment protected blacks against abuses by the government, but not from private groups. After that case more and more legislation was passed, putting a stop to Radical Reconstruction
Slavery was a part of frequent lifestyle in Tennessee during this time. Around one and four humans where living in Tennessee in 1860 were living as slaves. Most of the slaves were living in Middle Tennessee and West Tennessee. About 25 percent of the white families own or used a slave during this time period. Slavery was a very harsh system, slaves was enforced to work without paying. Many enslaved Tennesseans worked on farm and were used for labor in iron foundries or other businesses. About 7,000 free blacks lived in Tennessee during this time. Though technically free slaves had restrictive laws limited their opportunities. Slaves had not too many legal rights. For example, slave marriages were not recognized by law because but of them where
After the Civil War, white southerners had to figure out ways to continue feeling superior to their former slaves. Anxious to regain power over former slaves, southerners created the Black Codes of 1865. These codes were different from state to state, but most held similar restrictions. If blacks were unemployed, they could be arrested and charged with vagrancy. White Southerners believed blacks were to only work as agricultural laborers so the laws also restricted their hours of labor, duties, and behavior. Additionally, the codes prevented the raising of their own crops by black people. They were prohibited from ent...
After the Civil war had ended many states created something that came to be known as Black codes or Black codes. What these codes did was limit the economic and physical freedom for all people that were former slaves.
Black Codes to avoid the result of the Civil War, which was to end slavery.
Starting with the major racial divisions, which split society into two opposing parties. Reconstruction offers to bring high political leader roles to the black community as education is offered to more and more people. Foner states, “Divisions among whites have long been known to have shaped the course of Reconstruction.” This is a key reason why there are conflicts directly involved within the black community. The Second Reconstruction has successfully improved working opportunities for the blacks, but failed to unify both parties. However the idea of “black power and pride” was rising . This failed portion isn 't blamed on anyone one group of people, “If indeed they were active agents rather than passive victims, then blacks could not be absolved of blame for the failure of Reconstruction.” The cause of the statement is that the emphasis from slavery and free slave, the distinction wasn’t make absolutely clear during the First Reconstruction. If the idea of slavery was left behind and if any tension between whites and blacks was gone during the First Reconstruction, the country wouldn 't have to spend time revisiting the topic. In fact, the country would have the opportunity to use its time on something that would revolutionize society in the future. Foner makes a clear distinction that race wars were hugely impacted by both Reconstruction
Black Codes was a name given to laws passed by southern governments established during the presidency of Andrew Johnson. These laws imposed severe restrictions on freed slaves such as prohibiting their right to vote, forbidding them to sit on juries, limiting their right to testify against white men, carrying weapons in public places and working in certain occupations.
Imagine yourself wrongly convicted of a crime. You spent years in jail awaiting your release date. It finally comes, and when they let you out, they slap handcuffs around your wrists and tell you every single action you do. In a nutshell, that’s how the Black Codes worked. The southerners wanted control over the blacks after the Civil War, and states created their own Black Codes.
As an unabridged version of his other book, Eric Foner sets out to accomplish four main goals in A Short History of Reconstruction. These points enable the author to provide a smaller, but not neglectful, account of the United States during Reconstruction. By exploring the essence of the black experience, examining the ways in which Southern society evolved, the development of racial attitudes and race relations, and the complexities of race and class in the postwar South, as well as the emergence during the Civil War and Reconstruction of a national state possessing vastly expanded authority and a new set of purposes, Foner creates a narrative that encompasses some of the major issues during Reconstruction. Additionally, the author provides