Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar tragedy analysis
Julius caesar tragedy analysis
Julius caesar tragedy analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius caesar tragedy analysis
The composers of texts, Julius Caesar and The Pianist, use acts of representations to construct credible viewpoints that are conveyed to the audience in a certain event displayed in the texts. This is seen in the text, Julius Caesar, by the portrayal of events including the Oration and Calpurnia’s Dream. This notion is made evident to the Elizabethan audience in the Representation process and these devices are utilized to show the viewpoints based primarily on actions vs. intentions and the nature of manipulation. The composer of Pianist appeals to the appropriate audience by the use of several acts of representation customised to instil a viewpoint about the context and bring forth the perspectives on fate and free will.
Shakespeare deliberately develops reliable perspectives by the use of numerous acts of representation, diffusing his message across to the Elizabethan Audience. The text was intentionally produced as a play to relate to the Elizabethan Audience and the context, and therefore evoke further responses to the text. In the play, he specifically employs the Scenes of Oration and Calpurnia’s Dream based on the context, audience and the characterization, which exploit the nature of manipulation and actions vs. intentions. In the Oration scene, the application of rhetoric was common as seen from the crowd’s response from both Antony and Brutus speeches. However in Brutus speech, logos was primarily used to explore the key viewpoint of action vs. intention. This is seen by the statement by Brutus to the plebeians, ‘not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome More. Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him, as he was v...
... middle of paper ...
.... This directly build up the imagery of fate into the audience mind. Polanski successfully uses visual and aural cinematic devices to convey his message across to the modern audience in the scene where Szpilman is discovered by the German Officer, Hozenfield, who asks him to play The Piano. The use of silence and high mid angle shot reveals elements of fate and the tension creates a question, whether Szpilman has free will or is his fate dominant. During the scene whilst Szpilman is playing piano he is covered in a veil of light from the window, which symbolizes the possibility of dominance of fate in such an event where his life is at stake.
Works Cited
Polanski, Roman, dir. The Pianist. 2002. Universal Pictures, 2003. DVD.
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” Elements of Literature: Kylene Beers. Austin: Holt, 2009. 842-963. Print.
The play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare showcases many characters and events that go through many significant changes. One particular character that went through unique changes was Julius Caesar. The 16th century work is a lengthy tragedy about the antagonists Brutus and Cassius fighting with the protagonists Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus over the murder of Julius Caesar. Although the play’s main pushing conflict was the murder of Julius Caesar, he is considered a secondary character, but a protagonist. Throughout the theatrical work Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts display his diverse changes.
The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Prentice Hall Literature: Grade ten. Ed. Kate Kinsella, et.al. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2007. 824-923.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an intimate portrayal of the famed assassination of Julius Caesar and the complex inner workings of the men who committed the crime. In one particularly revealing scene, two of the men closest to Caesar, one a conspirator in his murder and one his second-in command, give orations for the deceased. Despite being simple in appearance, these two speeches do much of the work in developing and exposing the two characters in question. Though both have a love for Caesar, Mark Antony's is mixed with a selfish desire for power, while Brutus' is pure in nature, brought to a screeching halt by his overpowering stoicism. These starkly-contrasted personalities influence the whole of the play, leading to its tragic-but-inevitable end.
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” Elements of Literature: Kylene Beers. Austin: Holt, 2009. 842-963. Print.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. N.d. Print.
Works Cited Phillip Pullman. 2001-2013 goodreads.com. December 15, 2013 William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Prestwick House Literary Touchstone Classics, 2006.
Julius Caesar is another of William Shakespeare`s famous tragedies. This tragedy shows how character flaws can lead to one’s downfall. Julius Caesar is a man who becomes ruler over Rome. He believes that he wil...
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” Elements of Literature: Kylene Beers. Austin: Holt, 2009. 842-963. Print.
Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a historic tragedy about the brutal murder of the Roman senator, Julius Caesar. Within the play, Caesar has two close friends—Brutus and Antony. Antony is a loyal friend, supporting Caesar and encouraging him in his climb to kingship; Brutus is a king-fearing traitor who leads the plot to murder Caesar. After Caesar is murdered, both friends make speeches—Brutus to justify his actions and Antony to passive-aggressively disprove his claims. In the speeches, they use three rhetorical literary devices: ethos, the appeal to gain the crowd’s trust; pathos, stirring the crowd’s emotions to influence behavior; and logos, the use of logic to reason with the crowd. By comparing the use of ethos, pathos, and logos in each speech and by
Bloom, Harold. William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Chelsea House Publisher; Connecticut, New York, & Pennsylvania. 1988, Pg. #33 - 36
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” Elements of Literature: Kylene Beers. Austin: Holt, 2009. 842-963. Print.
Shakespeare, William. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." Houghton Mifflin Company. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston, 1994.
Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. Elements of Literature. Ed. Edwina McMahon et al. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1997.