Conflict In The Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell

Good Essays
Conflict is in relation to air. Air is ubiquitous and can be in anything. Conflict is comparable to air by the reason air is also omnipresent and is in most places. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford encounters man versus man, man versus self, and man versus nature conflicts. Throughout the short story, man versus man conflict is delineated. One segment which man versus man is shown is when Rainsford swam the waters of the Amazon, to General Zaroff’s chateau and feuds with General Zaroff. “‘One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed’”(23). Rainsford and General Zaroff fighting are a demonstration of man versus man conflict because Rainsford is the protagonist and goes up against the antagonist, General Zaroff. Also, the hunt represents how Rainsford in an absolute antithesis to General Zaroff and how they are on contradicting sides. General Zaroff’s and Rainsford’s fight is the main fragment of man versus man conflict in the short story.…show more content…
The section of the short story which provides man versus nature is when Rainsford falls off of his boat after dropping his pipe and trying to retrieve it. “He struggled up to the surface and tried to cry out, but the wash from the speeding yacht and slapped him in the face and the salt water in his open mouth made him gag and strangle”(10). Rainsford is in conflict with the choppy waves of the Amazon and the wash the boat generates. The man versus nature part is shown from the detail when the water chokes and strangles Rainsford. Rainsford is trying to fight and battle for his survival, but the waters do not let him do so. When Rainsford is trying to fight the choppy waters is the fundamental section of the story which shows a man versus nature
Get Access