Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The atmosphere and tone of Thomas Hardy Jude the obscure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Computational approaches are largely used in the variety of text applications such as feature selection and classification tasks because of their efficiency of dealing with huge amount of data. The discussion is concerned, however, with the applications of computational approaches to only literary texts in general and Hardy’s texts in particular. To my knowledge, there is no computer-aided thematic classification of the works of Thomas Hardy. The only study that approached Hardy’s works in terms of clustering techniques is Hoover’s (2002). It evaluates the validity of multivariate analysis techniques and especially cluster analysis based on frequent words in distinguishing texts by different authors and grouping texts by a single author. Hoover (2002) investigates 29 novels and literary critical texts of American and British writers including Hardy’s Jude Obscure, Tess of D’Urbervilles, and The Mayor of Casterbridge. The comparative lack of computer-based analysis of literary texts can be due to the unfamiliarity of the world of computational theory and methodology to literary scholars. Ramsay (2003) suggests that “the inability of computing humanists to break into the mainstream of literary critical scholarship may be attributed to the prevalence of scientific methodologies and metaphors in humanities computing research” (2003: 167). One might even suggest that the unfamiliarity with computational and mathematical approaches has generated in literary scholars the belief that all computational and statistical approaches are somehow antithetical to literary critical approaches. This would explain the gap we see between literary critical theory on the one hand and computer-based text analysis and quantitative approaches on the ... ... middle of paper ... ... powerful tools seem appropriate for the very large amounts of information represented by texts” (Hoover, 2001: 421). These have come to be used in critical investigations of theme (Labbe and Labbe, 2006; Laffal, 1995), structure, genre, characterization (Ramsay and Steger, 2006; Craig, 1999), imagery (Ide, 1989), and text classification (Burrows, 2004). In such applications, cluster analysis and PCA are the most dominant multivariate analysis methods. For instance, Ide (1989) investigates the use of Imagery in William Blake The Four Zoas by means of principal components analysis and correlation analysis. Similarly, Craig (1999) uses PCA of the frequencies of the very common words of characters in plays of Ben Jonson. He concludes that significant change within the idiolects of Jonson’s characters is one of the most remarkable features of Jonson’s characterization.
Brizee, Allen, and J. Case Tompkins. "Purdue OWL: Literary Theory and Schools of Criticism." Welcome to the Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL). 21 Apr. 2010. Web. 21 Apr. 2011. .
Heberle, Mark. "Contemporary Literary Criticism." O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. Vol. 74. New York, 2001. 312.
As in all art, each masterpiece has a distinct mark from their specific artist. The literary arts are no exception, with each author leaving a prominent rhythm, style and language. Thomas Hardy is known for his poems of separation. Thomas found love when he was 30 years old, but his relationship went sour when his marriage to Emma Gifford became estranged. Emma later died leaving her husband an outcast. It was not until 1914 when Thomas Hardy married his second wife, Florence, that he understood how much he missed his first wife. In his poems, Hardy focuses on withering love and the being miserable after a loss. Also, he uses rhyme scheme, multiple cesuras and end stops and symbolism to conceal a deeper meaning of the poem. The two poems that connect the two aspects of Thomas Hardy’s style are Your Last Drive and The Workbox.
The novels of Thomas Hardy are intricate and complicated works whose plots seem to be completely planned before the first word is ever actually formed on paper. Though I have no proof of Hardy’s method of writing, it is clear that he focuses more on plot development than characterization in the novels Far From the Madding Crowd, Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure. The advantages of this can be easily seen in the clever twists and turns that occur in the novel which hold the reader’s interest. But the main reason Hardy uses this method, especially in the tragedies Tess and Jude, is to present a moral argument to the reader through actions done by and to the main characters of the novels. By mapping out the turning points ahead of time, Hardy is able to control the course of his writings, and they emerge as a social criticism. But in doing this, the characters are condemned to a literary predestination. Hardy concentrates more on forcing the characters to carry out these actions than allowing their personalities to become fully and freely developed. Females perform most of the necessary but unlikely actions, and Hardy blames any erratic behavior on woman’s natural inconsistency. Thus, in reaching for a high literary purpose Hardy inadvertently stunts the development of the main female characters.
Parker, Robert Dale. How to Interpret Literature: Critical Theory for Literary and Cultural Studies. New York: Oxford, 2011. Print.
Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, Jeanne C. Reesman, and John R. Willingham. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 125-156.
Guerin, Wilfred L., et.al. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Through vivid yet subtle symbols, the author weaves a complex web with which to showcase the narrator's oppressive upbringing. Two literary critics whose methods/theories allow us to better comprehend Viramontes. message are Jonathan Culler and Stephen Greenblatt. Culler points out that we read literature differently than we read anything else. According to the intertextual theory of how people read literature, readers make assumptions (based on details) that they would not make in real life.
The Life of Pi by Ang Lee (2012) explores an individual’s discovery of religion through a journey that is mental, physical and spiritually challenging. Furthermore, the text is a prescribed film for the Australian English curriculum’s area of study (BOSTES, 2013). Life of Pi portrays a powerful notion of an individual’s struggle with faith and the inherent evil of humanity (Bolton, 2013, p.2). It correlates with the requirements of exploring discovery through “emotional, creative, intellectual, physical and spiritual” (BOSTES, 2014, p.9) means. Indeed, text relates to the struggles of discovery and the acceptance of one’s identity through a philosophical debate between religion and faith (Steelman et al., 2014, p.193).
There are billions of books in the world, all with different plots and styles. However, the one thing they all have in common is that they all have literary devices. A literary device is any technique a writer uses to help the reader understand and appreciate the meaning of the work. Due to the use of these devices, books that would otherwise have nothing in common can be compared. For instance, the books Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift, and If I Stay by Gayle Forman have different plots and themes. But when both are examined closely, it is evident that they utilize many different and similar literary devices.
Today, Thomas Hardy’s position as a poet is as secure as his position as a novelist. Critics and scholars have started approaching his creative genius in the two different literary genres differently. It would be unreasonable to trust anyone who may still believe that Hardy, the novelist, was more Victorian than Hardy the poet, who allegedly was closer to the moderns. It has been established that Hardy had started writing poems even before he tried his hand at novel writing. Indeed, even when his career as a novelist was soaring, Hardy, the poet, wrote as a contemporary to Hardy the novelist. Many of his poems, that have been dated, confirm this. Hardy scholars have also tried to find similarities between the themes of his novels and poems. They seem to have overlooked the fact that similar emotions expressed in two different literary genres yield distinct effects, both for the author and the reader. That Hardy found more solace while expressing himself in poetry needs no proof due to his disowning the tag of a novelist and his desire to be remembered as a poet. Thus, while approaching Hardy’s poetry one needs to purposefully digress from the traditional path of viewing him as a popular novelist who also wrote poems or a poet at heart who considered his novel writing as ‘pot-boiler’. This neat dissection of Hardy’s literary genius, into two separate parts, may hinder a comprehensive analysis. On the other hand, a see-saw approach that alternatively draws inspiration and instances from both the novels and the poems, at will, can also persuade scholars to seek identical perceptions in the two distinct genres.
I chose Luis Hernandez for my artifact. It is from Dr. Rodriguez’s EDRE 4861 Language Arts and Social Studies Instructional K-8 fall class. It fits the criteria for standard # 8; understanding and using a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.. I understand I need a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop a deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. The Projecbestex, is another web base amazing tool to have at any grade level. It can be used to accommodate any learning style, because
There have been different views among the academics however today there is a renewed concentration on the use of literature in the classroom.
Literary criticism is used as a guideline to help analyze, deconstruct, interpret, or even evaluate literary works. Each type of criticism offers its own methods that help the reader to delve deeper into the text, revealing all of its innermost features. New Criticism portrays how a work is unified, Reader-Response Criticism establishes how the reader reacts to a work, Deconstructive Criticism demonstrates how a work falls apart, Historical Criticism illustrates how the history of the author and the author’s time period influence a text, and last of all, Psychological Criticism expresses how unconscious motivations drive the author in the creation of their work as well as how the reader’s motivations influence their own interpretation of the text (Lynn 139, 191). This creates a deep level of understanding of literature that simply cannot be gained through surface level reading. If not one criticism is beneficial to the reader, then taking all criticisms or a mixture of specific criticisms into consideration might be the best way to approach literary
The Web. The Web. 9 Dec. 2010. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/aboutEbook.do?pubDate=119880000&actionString=DO_DISPLAY_ABOUT_PAGE&inPS=true&prodId=LitRG&userGroupName=west89013tgps&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&docId=GALE%7C0KTB>. - - -. “Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800.”