Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
romeo and juliet compared to the movie
romeo and juliet compared to the movie
comparison between romeo and juliet movies grade 10 english
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: romeo and juliet compared to the movie
Comparison of Romeo and Juliet Movies
Franco Zeffirellis ‘Romeo & Juliet’ was the most popular film in the
box office in 1968, eight years after he directed it on the stage in
the West End. Baz Luhrmann created his version thirty years later, in
a modern style. There are many differences and similarities between
the films, but each does not change the tale. They use young actors
and actresses to appeal to the younger audience at the time that they
were released, but it is obvious to see the generation gap between
them.
The first noticeable difference is in the films title. Baz Luhrmanns
1997 version is named ‘Romeo + Juliet’, while Zefirellis is ‘Romeo &
Juliet’. Luhrmann used ‘+’ instead of ‘&’ because it is a more modern
term, and his film is set in modern times. The ‘+’ is also shown in
the form a crucifix. Throughout Baz Luhrmanns film, the religious
aspect of the families is stressed, and this use of the crucifix
supports that idea within the title. Zefirelli uses ‘&’ because it is
a traditional form of writing ‘and’, and his film is a traditional
style.
The introduction of Zefirellis ‘Romeo & Juliet’ begins with panoramic
views of Verona as the camera pans across the landscape. It seems very
calm and serene. There is soft, classical music playing and writing
appears on the screen. (in this order)
1. Franco Zefirelli’s Production of
2. William Shakespeare’s
3. Romeo & Juliet
Zefirelli is pushing the point that this is his version of the play.
While this is seen, the prologue is said. It is said slowly, and the
voice is soft, as if it is going to be a peaceful fairytale story. The
views you see are of a medieval Verona at dawn. The sun is rising and
the empty marketplace is seen being...
... middle of paper ...
...to go to the cinema and generally have
a more disposable income. By using young actors and actresses, Franco
Zefirelli attracted a wider young audience to see his film. Baz
Luhrmanns film was made with younger actors too, but it was also made
in the ‘MTV generation’, where crime, guns and fast action is widely
enjoyed by younger viewers.
Each film is different in their own ways, but they both closely follow
the romantic and tragic tale of ‘Romeo and Juliet’. The films were
aimed at the same young age group, but are completely unalike. The
generation gap between them shows how much life and interests have
changed within thirty years. The films are in two different worlds.
Zefirellis is romantic and medieval, Baz Luhrmanns dramatic and
modern, but in each both directors have adapted the story to fit the
demand of the viewers at the time they were made.
“At the window she raises the shade and a dusky southside morning light comes in feebly” (Act 1, Sc 1, 24).
After hearing this description, an elegant sunset with innocent animals roaming about pops into mind.
This is a movie in another movie that has a story from the past that is repeated nowadays: the same conflicts between exploited and exploiters, enslavement, injustice, protection of the public against those who put a price, and also the story of how the union of many sometimes gets what seemed
Juliet’ due to the fact that his film work was about youth and how its
One of the most celebrated plays in history, “Romeo and Juliet”, was written by William Shakespeare in the late 16th century. It is a story about two lovers that have to meet in secret because of an ongoing family feud. Tragically, because of their forbidden love Romeo and Juliet take their lives so they can be together. In 1997, a movie was adapted from the play “Romeo and Juliet”, directed by Baz Lurhmann. However, as alike as the movie and the play are, they are also relatively different.
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
From the piece of artwork “Rain at the Auvers”. I can see roofs of houses that are tucked into a valley, trees hiding the town, black birds, clouds upon the horizon, hills, vegetation, a dark stormy sky and rain.
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
The colorful sky at sunrise is being compared to a ruler taking the throne. Dawn rises up and lingers in the sky for a short while before leaving. It would make sense to personify dawn as taking a seat atop the sky.
The romantic tension between Romeo and Juliet and Tony and Maria in Shakespears original play and its modern day remake, Westside Story, is what makes them have such passionate and entrancing scenes. The main reason for romantic tension in these two plays is because the two couples can’t be together like they want to be. There are many different aspects that create different quality of romantic tension in these two scenes. Although the two plays have similar plots, the romantic tension between the two lovers is very different because of the setting, the language and the circumstances in which the lovers face.
One of the greatest questions addressed in both Romeo and Juliet and Shakespeare in Love is the question "does love conquer all?" Should one follow his heart or should one conform to society's view as to what is proper? In the movie, love does in fact conquer all, but, in the play, it does not. In the play Romeo and Juliet decide to follow their hearts and they do not conform to society's wishes. Romeo and Juliet end up dead and the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is over. In the case of Shakespeare in Love, Will loses Viola but his love for her lives on as seen in his later writings. So, one could argue that in some instances love does indeed conquer all and, in other cases, it does not. Following the path of true love can be a tragic one as seen in Romeo and Juliet. As for Shakespeare in Love, both characters meet society's wishes and therefore return to their normal lives never being quite the same.
Lacey, N. (2005). Film Language. Introduction to film (pp. 16-22). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
To say a couple is star-crossed means that their relationship will not last and is cursed to not work out. However, this couple may have intense feelings for each other, but not be destined to be together. It is called star cross because people who believe in astrology think the stars control human feelings. That is of course an opinion and why Shakespeare wrote that Romeo and Juliet were star-crossed lovers.
William Shakespeare has provided some of the most brilliant plays to ever be performed on the stage. He is also the author of numerous sonnets and poems, but he is best known for his plays such as Hamlet, Macbeth, A Midsummer Night's Dream, and Romeo and Juliet. In this essay I would like to discuss the play and movie, "Romeo and Juliet", and also the movie, Shakespeare in Love.
Barsam, Richard. Looking at Movies An Introduction to Film, Second Edition (Set with DVD). New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. Print.