Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Autocratic leadership and its problems
Autocratic leadership and its problems
Autocratic leadership and its problems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Autocratic leadership and its problems
AC2.3 Comparison of the leadership styles of Mr. Worthy and Ms. Hogan;
Leadership Style theories: based on the view that leadership is an interpersonal process and different leader behaviors influence people in different ways. It focuses on one style at a time. Leadership styles can be viewed in two extremes:
Wholly task focused, directive style with higher leader control
Wholly people focused supportive style with higher subordinate freedom.
Ashridge presented a model with four distinct leadership styles, as follow:
1. Autocratic: the leader takes all the decisions which are to be obeyed without any intervention or objection,
2. Persuasive: the leader makes all the decisions but believe that employees must be motivated to carry out them
…show more content…
This will motivate all as the one who has done well will try to do better next time too and others will also want to have that appreciation and reward.
• In every job there must be chance of growth and development, people should feel that if they will work harder they will be promoted, so Ms. Hogan must motivate everyone that if they will perform well they can be promoted to higher ranks. (managing people, 2009)
Task-3
AC3.1 the benefits of team working for the above mentioned organization:
In a credit card company, the basic factor is customer satisfaction and for that purpose team work is very important. A team is a group of people working together on a specific common goal using their positive synergy, individual and mutual accountability. A team is ideal if everyone in the team knows what he has to do and what his actual role is? According to Belbin an ideal team should have these 9 roles to increase the efficiency and effectiveness.
Plant: creative, imaginative people that can solve difficult problems.
Resource investigator: explores opportunities.
Coordinator: clarifies goals, and coordinate with everyone.
Shaper: challenging; has the courage to overcome
…show more content…
Leader will be the one assigning duties, he will be the one making decisions, but he will also be the responsible. Definitely working as a team leader will be different in fact difficult from team member. When you are working as a team member you are only responsible for your own work but if you are a team leader you are responsible for everyone under your group, you have to keep an eye on everyone. The team leader has to make actions so that the deadline is met. If the team does anything wrong, leader will be the one blamed for this but again if the team performs well leader will be praised. To deal with criticism is very important quality that a leader needs as if team’s project is failing everyone will hate the leader. (Because you will be blamed for this: even by your team.) In case of any conflict raised the leader is the one who will calm the waters among the members and ensure that the matter does not affect the work. In any difficult situation leader will control his nerves and has to strengthen others: motivating the team
In this video team is defined as a group of workers with a shared mission and vision and collective responsibilities .In other words one of the ways for business to organize employees is in teams. A team is made of two or more people who work together to achieve a common goal. Teams are becoming more common in the business world today. Effective teams can lead to increased employee motivation and business productivity. The video explains team members are accountable to one another and each team member plays a critical role in the team success.
My impression of leadership is the ability to motivate, inspire, set a visualization, connect, and lead by example. To become a successful leader you have to be able to convince your followers that you are trustworthy of being followed. During this semester, we have learned many, if not all of the major leadership theories and how they play a role in our everyday lives. But personally, a few of these leadership models caught me and intrigued me the whole semester so much that this paper is going to predominately be referenced about them. For example, the proposed framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory 's focus and approach. Focus is referred to as whether or not leadership is viewed as a set of traits or actions.
A leadership theory is a clarification of some features of leadership; theories have practical importance as they are being used for better understanding, anticipating, and controlling successful leadership. Hence, the main principle of any theory is to inform practice(Lussier and Achua 2009). Leadership theories could be classified into eight main categories: Great man, trait, behavioral, contingency, Situational, Participative, Relationship , management (Cherry 2010).
The core behaviors of this leader are divided into four dimensions: (a) idealized influence, (b) inspirational motivation, (c) intellectual stimulus, and (d) individualized consideration. Idealized Influence (II) Idealized influence which builds appreciation, confidence, respect and trust, providing employees with a sense of mission (Northouse, 2010). to occur this behavior, leaders must be a role models for their staff seek to emulate (Ilies , 2012). When a leader is a role model for staff, it becomes less likely that there will be resistance to change or new initiatives that are to be implemented (Wang,
Leadership is a topic of great interest and for decades now, theories on leadership have been of major interest and the source of numerous studies. In reality, many have tried to define what allows genuine and patriotic leaders to stand out from the masses based on what they exhibit individually, hence, there as many theories on leadership as a result of works done by various philosophers, researchers and professors. Below are the ten theories every leader should know:
Unfortunately, being inspiring to employees is not enough. These situations occur when employees face challenges in accomplishing goals. In such situations, a leader needs to exercise power and influence to push forth the desired goals. While the course identified five sources of power, I believe only three should be considered for an effective leader. The first is legitimate power (6), which is often considered the first source of power in the organizations I have worked in. The source of power comes...
Team leader tend to participate more at this stage than in the early stages. Team members can be expected to assume greater responsibility for decision-making and their professional behaviour.
Leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and inspire others (Gill, 2006). It is therefore defined as a process whereby a leader influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2013). A leader has to make a decision for something to happen and provide his followers with clear direction (Rost et al, 1991). It will evoke feelings of challenge, excitement and involvement for the followers to proceed with the task (Gill, 2006).
A team is defined as a small number of people with complementary skills, who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable (Katzenbach et at., 2003). Spatz (2000) and Katzenbach et al. (2003) added elements such as complementary skills, commitment, common purpose and goals, common approach or strategy and mutual accountability are the important elements for a real team. Hackman (1990) had the comparable definition where team, which form by two or more individuals with different set of skill to work adaptively to achieve a common purpose and goal.
...cation and motivation. Finally shared some thoughts on what are effective employees, successful managers, and exemplary citizens.
Leaderis a person who has strong ability to control and direct people in the right ways. There are 10 types of leadership, also there are many differences in skills between leaders and many different ways that each leader uses to treat others. Also Leadership has been described as "a process of social influence in which a person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task". For example, some understand a leader simply as somebody whom people follow, or as somebody who guides or directs others, while others define leadership as "motivating and organizing a group of people to achieve a common goal".
We can divide the theories that deal with leadership in 3 chronological groups. First were the trait theories. Until the 1940's, research in the field of leadership was dominated by these theories. Second came the behavioral theories which were very influent until the late 1960's. Finally, contingency theories are the most modern theories about leadership.
Essential changes in the world of management are being experienced in an arbitrary routine. To muddle through such changes, prominence is laid increasingly on individual proficiencies and outcomes. Changes experienced in technology and organization structures at work in recent times require managers and alternatively top officials to improve on their interpersonal skills, and the ever increasing significance of the customer leading to an explosion of practices, techniques and principles that work (Allison, 2006). However, the modern world of management falls short of maintaining an economically favorable balance of productivity against loss costs. Arguably, the most effective albeit most neglected means of motivation requires only occasional genuine demonstrations of management concern and interest coupled with the provision of remedial or corrective actions. In the management world, motivation may be used to refer to the entirety of psychological motives that inducts and directs an employee's behavior in the direction of a goal or objective where the attainment and accomplishment of the goal is equivalent to meeting a need or necessity felt by that person (Certo et al, 2006).
There are many different types of theories on leadership. There is Fiedler’s contingency theory, situational theories of leadership and House’s path-goal theory. These theories are used to make an individual or manager a more effective leader. They can be used as a guide for individuals and help them achieve whatever goal is set out by their organization or group.
A team is a group of people with a full set of complementary skills required to complete a project. Team members work toward a common goal. A team becomes more than just a collection of people when a strong sense of mutual commitment creates synergy, thus generating performance greater than the sum of the performance of its individual members. Team members not only need clear goals, they needs roles to help facilitate