Comparison Of Max Tayler And Scientific Management

1195 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Impact of Technology on Business

Business back in the early twentieth century had different points of view comparing to now a days. But it was in that time that some main researches have been made by several managers. The main concern will be with two very specific and important theorists that highly influenced the world, Max Webber (1864-1924) and Winslow Taylor (1856-1915). The discussion is about Taylor’s principles of ‘Scientific Management’ and ‘Bureaucracy’ in eyes of Max Webber.

Winslow Taylor spent most of his life trying to resolve the problem of efficiency. Majority of his work was concentrated on how to improve physical work productivity. He shared his ideas and researches to other as he published ‘Scientific Management’ in 1911.

In the times of Taylor the world was passing through a several major changes in technology. In consequence from the industrial revolution new machines and labour arose. The main problem was how organisations (firms) will process their operations that are most profitable. Taylor’s solution to this was systematic analysis from which many of his …show more content…

The biggest similarity is that both of them try to achieve the greatest efficiency (biggest profit and greatest harmony). Adding to this, also these two theories include the division in work which forms an important role. As well as, they both disadvantage the employees and at the same time give him some benefits. Moreover the selection process in both theories is a main feature which has a big impact on the effectiveness of the organisation. They both as well lack in theoretical social science foundations. In contrast, Webber shows how to run a company while Taylor analyses work systems. In addition Taylor’s rules where to achieve greater efficiency but Webber rules were made to legitimise power. To conclude Scientific Management proved that it can change over time while Bureaucratic system did not

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Management Theories Of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo And Douglas Mcgregor

    2062 Words  | 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches?

    Read More

  • A Brief Analysis of The Steel Industry

    1473 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)

    Read More

  • Fordism is the Scientific Management for Contemporary Organizations

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    Comparisons that can be made include Fordism's mechanisation of mass production and Taylor's attempts at using employees as machines. Taylor designed this using his principles of management that included developing a science for each element of work and finding the quickest way the job could be done.

    Read More

  • Management Theory of Frederick Taylor

    1999 Words  | 4 Pages

    Taylor contended that the success of these principles required "a complete mental revolution" on the part of management and labor. Rather than quarrel over profits, both sides should try to increase production; by so doing, he believed, profits would rise to such an extent that labor and management would no longer have to fight over them. In short, Taylor believed that management and labor had a common interest in increasing productivity.

    Read More

  • Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber

    2891 Words  | 6 Pages

    Today’s era of business world adapts to everything new but these modern concepts are an indirect tribute to the theories produced by Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber. Taylor’s Scientific management theory is one such example which has become such an important aspects of modern management that it feels unbelievable that his concepts were a part of the history. It is falsely assumed that as the society progresses, the older theories tend to lose their importance. The thing to be noted here is that these theories are based on basic human needs which do not change with time; the thing that changes is the method to fulfil those needs. Investigating earlier management theories is important because these theories are less complex and provide immediate solution to the problems. These theories basically help us to go to the root of the problem and understand its complexity. The better understanding we have about the problem, the easier it is to accomplish the objectives of the company. The following essay states the importance of the Taylor’s Scientific management theory and how it is implemented even today in the business world.

    Read More

  • Rational Organizational Design

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Management is a process of planning, organisation, command, coordination, and control” (Morgan 2006, p.18). Rational organisation design is a bureaucratic method of management which emphasizes efficiency to achieve the end goal and the management of multiple companies have taken upon this system. Figures such as Frederick Taylor and Henry Ford have both shown and laid a path way for Rational Organisation which has become known as Taylorism and Fordism. The design has received criticism and both Taylor and Ford have been portrayed as villains with Taylor being called “enemy of the working man” (Morgan 2006, p.23) as the system dehumanised workers by taking all of the thought and skill from them and giving it to the managers this is because the tasks given were simple and repetitive. As staff needed little training they became an easily replaceable asset and thus more machine than human.

    Read More

  • The Ryanair Case Study: The Importance Of Scientific Management

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    As we can see from the case study, ryanair has pushed itself to success in its current period. Based on research so far in this essay, it seems that the whole reason behind Frederick Taylor’s theory is that he tends to aim for making the most of his employees, to work to their highest standards for a successful company. When we look at the Ryanair case study on (Management, D. Boddy pg 23) we can see that one of the key points is that the staff must turn an aircraft round between the flights in a matter of 25 minutes, which has a positive affect on increasing revenue. However this leaves the employees under pressure but this also tells us that the Ryanair organisation make the most out of their employees, just like Frederick Taylor’s theory. Getting these tasks complete by the employees is all in the manager’s responsibility, Ryanair regulate their staff so that the managers are held responsible for providing the strategies for the employees as mentioned in the case study on (Management, D. Boddy pg 23). Frederick Taylor’s scientific management theory has an influence on this as quoted

    Read More

  • The Human Side Of Enterprise By Mcgregor Summary

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is some benefits to the conventional theory which are the average man is by nature indolent, he lacks ambitions, he is by nature resistant to change. It is also two different approaches to management is hard

    Read More

  • The Impact of Taylorism and Fordism on the US Motor Vehicle Industry

    1853 Words  | 4 Pages

    In my essay we will take a look at Frederick Taylors principles of scientific management and his contribution to manufacturing and the influence he has had. We will use Ford as the organization as Fordism I closely linked to Taylorism and has been majorly influenced by it. The U.S. motor vehicle industry emerged at the end of the 19th century as a craft production system with a labor force that included skilled workers who had knowledge about mechanical design and the materials they were working with. After World War I, Henry Ford invented the mass production system (now known as Fordism). In his system, the product, the production process, and the tasks that each particular worker performed were standardized.

    Read More

  • Workaholics and Workaholism: A Growing Problem for Companies

    1974 Words  | 4 Pages

    The term “workaholism” appeared in the beginning of the 20th century after Frederick Taylor integrated new organization of work system. Taylor, famous businessman was born in 1856 in Philadelphia, and was known as “father of scientific management”. His new theory of work management has been known as “Taylorism”. The term “Taylorism” is seldom used in a positive way. For a short description, according to JoAnn Greco, the journalist of “The Journal of Business Strategy”, “Taylorism” is “a sort of ruthless and quasi-Victorian efficiency that melds man with machine, often to man’s disadvantage.” According Taylor’s theory of work organization the worker is nothing but a tool for gaining profit. (Greco)

    Read More

  • Relevance Of Scientific Management Essay

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    This essay will discuss the relevance of Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management to organisations today. Taylor’s theory of Scientific Management is based around how efficiently a member of staff works in order to improve their productivity, the theory was introduced in 1911 and has four principles which were tested to determine optimal work methods, and are still seen in organisations today such as fast-food restaurants. Taylor believed that workers left to their own devices would restrict their output and not progress with the task, this was called ‘soldiering’ and it was described in two forms; natural

    Read More

  • Taylor's and Weber's Theories of Management

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.

    Read More

  • Evaluate The Contribution Of The Hawthorne Studies To The Development Of Management Theory And Practice

    1673 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the past, managers considered workers as machinery that could be bought and sold easily. To increase production, workers were subjected to long hours, miserable wages and undesirable working conditions. The welfare of the workers and their need were disregarded. The early twentieth century brought about a change in management and scientific management was introduced. This sort of management, started by Frederick Winslow Taylor, emphasised that the best way to increase the volume of output was to have workers specializing in specific tasks just like how a certain machine would perform a particular function. His implementation of this theory brought about tremendous criticism by the masses arguing that the fundamentals of Scientific Management were to exploit employees rather than to benefit them (Mullins, 2005)

    Read More

  • Organizational Theory of Behavior of Frederick Taylor, Max Weber, and Henri Fayol

    956 Words  | 2 Pages

    Frederick Taylor thought that changes in the work process and/or rules would advance efficiency and productivity. He originated the scientific management approach in public administration. It was based on the idea that work processes should be observed via experiments which would greatly improve productivity. It would do so by doing away with the rule of thumb work methods and replacing them with the results of actual timed observations (14). The application of the scientific approach to management methods would lead to optimizing task time by simplifying the job. It would mean observing work processes to find the one best way to perform each job (15). Once the best way was discovered, all employees were to use it. The simplification of the job would improve task time. This method would lead to increased productivity, higher wag...

    Read More

  • Classical Management Theory

    1964 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Max Tayler And Scientific Management

Open Document