More handpicked essays just for you.
The analysis of Milton's the paradise lost
The analysis of Milton's the paradise lost
The analysis of Milton's the paradise lost
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The analysis of Milton's the paradise lost
For this discussion topic, I chose to use lines one and two “1If we must die—let it not be like 2hogs Hunted and penned in an inglorious spot.” Here the reader is presented with the symbol of “Hogs.” From these two lines, we are drawn to an understanding that the author was expressing to the reader that there are turmoil and danger in which the person or persons involved were experiencing. They were being attacked. Therefore when we make the comparisons of lines one and two, we must break it down, line by line to understand what the symbol was about. My Analogy of line one: The word “Hogs” as referenced here relates to the fact that pigs are killed most brutally, and for sure don’t get to choose how they will be executed (killed). You must
When the buffalo was originally taken in, Rat had a soft and nurturing mind-set towards the buffalo. He displayed his affection by stroking the nose of the buffalo and offering food, which seemed like a natural and normal response to do to animal that had just been taken in. In a way, Rat was trying to make the buffalo a pet and use it to replace Curt as a friend. However, to most people, this was uncharacteristic of the typical soldier. The classic soldier was viewed as being callous and uncaring. By Rat displaying this type of amiable characteristic, it went against the ideology of how a soldier reacts to war. A soldier should maintain distant from the war and just do the job that he was given without showing emotion. However, the simple fact that Rat showed any sentiment at all proposed that death evokes feelings because his friend just died and he was abl...
The author uses diction in the passages to signify the effect of the author¡¯s meaning in story and often sway readers to interpret ideas in one way or another. The man in the story arrives to a ¡°[dry] desert¡± where he accosts an animal with ¡°long-range attack¡± and ¡°powerful fangs.¡± The author creates a perilous scene between the human and animal in order to show that satisfaction does not come from taking lives. With instincts of silence and distrust, both of them freeze in stillness like ¡°live wire.¡± In addition, the man is brought to the point where animal¡¯s ¡°tail twitched,¡± and ¡°the little tocsin sounded¡± and also he hears the ¡°little song of death.¡± With violence ready to occur, the man tries to protect himself and others with a hoe, for his and their safety from the Rattler. The author criticizes how humans should be ¡°obliged not to kill¡±, at least himself, as a human. The author portrays the story with diction and other important techniques, such as imagery, in order to influence the readers with his significant lesson.
"We called to them, tried to tell them there was no danger, called them to stop, implored them to stand. We called them cowards, denounced them in the most offensive term, put out our heavy revolvers, and threatened to shoot them, but all in vain; a cruel crazy, mad, hopeless panic possessed them, and communicated to everybody about in front and rear. The heat was awful, although now about six; the men were exhausted their mouths' gaped, their lips cracked and blackened with the powder of the cartridges they had bitten off in the battle, their eyes starting in frenzy; no mortal ever saw such a mass of ghastly wretches."
To begin, one way O’Brien presents imagery is through the use of how he describes his experiences from working in the pig factory which allows him to form a tone that expresses disgust and that can relate to how he feels about the draft. Tim gave clear examples of what he does at the pig factory and he describes factors in the environment by saying how the pigs were “decapitated” and the “greasy pig stink” made him feel as if his life is “collapsing towards slaughter”. Through O’Brien’s lens, readers are able to compare changes in his life since the draft notice to all negative aspects of working of in the pig factory. While Tim’s
In his short story “Chickamauga,” Ambrose Bierce uses juxtaposition to contrast the glorified version of war with the realities of it. Bierce juxtaposes the child’s “imaginary foes” with a “more formidable enemy” otherwise known as “a rabbit”. Being the first time that the reader is exposed to a somewhat realistic version of war, Bierce uses the rabbit to show the lack of courage that the child has when facing an actual foe instead of the imaginary ones that he grew accustomed to. This is indicative of the fact that men crave and glorify war until they experience the realities of it. They are willing to fight for their glorious cause with great courage until they face the dangers and realities of war. In the child’s own imaginative form of
“Has anyone ever heard of animal cruelty?” Not when it comes to getting cheap food. Produces want to make as much money as possible. Needless to say, they don’t care how they get it. According to the December 14, 2006 “Boss Hog-Part 1” by Jeff Tietz in Rolling Stone claims “As long as the pig remains ambulatory, it can be legally killed and sold as meat.” That means if the hog is full of diseases and it can move with or without drugs, you eat it. That statement is supported by Smithfield Foods. Tietz lat...
Finally, through symbolism the novels truly come alive. The symbolism present gives the reader a clear depiction of the cruelty that is to befall both men. It is truly tragic how close these horrific stories are, a sad testament to dark chapters in time honored establishments, American economy and Christian missionaries. If these are the consequences of such highly thought of establishments, is there anyway to stop oppression from overcoming the world? It tends to make one think.
In the short story “Chickamauga,” by Ambrose Bierce, there are several examples of imagery throughout the passages that help to describe the horrors of war. Bierce sets the story with a young boy playing war in a forest, who is then approached by a “formidable enemy,” a rabbit. The sudden appearance startles the boy into fleeing, calling for his mother in “inarticulate cries,” and his skin getting “cruelly torn by brambles.” The selection of these details leaves a lucid image in the mind of the reader, allowing them to see a sobbing boy running through the forest, covered in cuts and scratches. It represents the innocence and fear of a child, lost and alone in an unknown place. The birds above his head “sang merrily” as the boy was “overcome
The way they prepared the hogs, first they were hung upside down, then they were attached to a moving cable; systematically “disassembled.” A worker would slit the throats, another one would “scald” them with hot water, then scrapped and gutted out. After that the hogs would get decapitated and refrigerated. The Chicago River became the “waste basket”, they would pump the blood and waste into the River. The hog’s lard would get converted into horns and the hoofs into glue. The intestines were made into sausages and contained mediocre quality chemically treated meat which included parts or rats and roaches. However, working in a slaughter house was more dangerous that eating their processed meats. Each year, hundreds of workers would get disabled and killed by on the job incidents. The workers work from around fifty-five to sixty hours per week and pay was low. They would earn around fifteen to twenty cents an hour. Each year the workers would get laid off for an approximate of eight weeks with no pay; they would have earned $475 per year. Most of the workers working in the meat packing industry would not earn enough money to support their families. Even though
The speaker tells his wife that “[he] don’t see much of them square-‘eaded ‘Uns” (l.5). He drops the letter “h” and makes grammatical errors that exhibit his illiteracy. His clumsy sentence formations display it, too. In line five, he means to say that he does not see many of “those Huns” but replaces “those” with "them”. The “Huns” refer the enemies of World War I. The speaker speaks to his wife in a comfortable tone to avoid causing any suspicion and to arouse optimism and hope. In contrast, the diction choice changes when the speaker converses with his comrade. When the speaker gets shot, he screams, “Guh! Christ! I’m hit/ Take ‘old/ No, damn your iodine.” (l.20-21). The “h” sound is aspirated on the word "hit" to emphasize the impact of the bullet. The immense pain makes him swear and criticize any help being offered. This shows that during turmoil, it is difficult to be discreet. Even though the soldier tries to protect his family from the truth to comfort them, the truth always manages to spill out in some way. He tries to convince his wife that the war will not harm him but his death at the end of the poem unravels the truth.
Through use of language, the pigs appeal to the animals basic hopes and desires of a better life and a better future. They make others work extremely hard, while they themselves rest and unfairly reap most of the benefits of the work. For example, “Now comrades,... to the hayfield! Let us make it a point of honor get in the harvest more quickly than Jones and his men do.” Later in chapter three, Squealer is sent to justify the pigs selfishness and to convince the animals that the pigs are working in their favor. He said, “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples...Milk and apples contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig...the whole management and organization of this farm depend on us.” This how the animals are persuaded to believe almost anything without question.
Of course, the pigs thought that their end was good, but it wasn’t because they only wanted to advantage a minority and didn’t care about the other animals. It wasn’t enough for them that they succeeded in living comfortably, everyone else had to fail and struggle to live.
“Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.” This commandment is crucial in demonstrating the betrayal that the other farm animals experienced. This commandment it basically making the point that the animals are good and the humans are evil. In the end, the pigs did what they said they would never do, follow in the evil footsteps of the humans. As the changes on t...
Wiesel uses the sustained figurative language using words such as ‘dogs’ and other animalistic references throughout the text to demonstrate how in the eyes of the soldiers they are no longer seen as people. ‘You will all be shot like dogs’. Descriptive imagery is also used to explain how the civilians were also inhumane to the prisoners, with a description of the prisoners being ‘beasts of prey unleashed…sharpening their teeth and nails’ as the citizens spurred it on. This explains the inhumanity that not only the s...
It’s being shown when he writes, “They would have heard the screaming, / Then heard it stop and had a view of us / In our gloves and aprons / coming down the hill” (lines 6-9). This evokes an image showing that what is being told and said is what is truly happening. That the soldiers were so close to them that they could hear the slightest scream of a pig being slaughtered.