Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
rhetorical analysis of martin luther king's i have a dream speech
rhetorical analysis of martin luther king's i have a dream speech
rhetorical analysis of martin luther king's i have a dream speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During the shaping years of this country, there were many social classes that faced immense persecution and mistreatment. In two of these groups specifically, leaders rose that aided in the freeing of these minorities from their oppression. One of these leaders is Martin Luther King Jr., who in his speech entitled “I Have a Dream”, addresses all colored Americans and expresses his views on the treatment of African Americans all around the country. The other leader is Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who in her two addresses “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions” and “Solitude of Self”, challenges men and women alike to help end the injustices committed against women. Although both King and Stanton are working towards a very similar cause, they …show more content…
One main similarity is the use of popular, well known documents or addresses in all of the aforementioned speeches. Stanton bases her entire “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions” speech on the Declaration of Independence, and has it follow the structure of this document almost exactly. In her speech “Solitude of Self”, Stanton even goes on to quote from the bible when she quotes from the book of Matthew “My God! My God! why hast thou forsaken me?” (King James Bible, Matt. 27:46). King mentions many documents and addresses in his “I Have a Dream” speech, including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Gettysburg Address. These are all mentioned in an effort to increase the sense of devotion in their followers. King and Stanton are both trying to cause a change of major national law, which causes them to use past documents that state and define the purpose of government, as well as other scripts that state higher law that must be followed by all people. This is done to try and convince the people that will truly cause the change, such as Congress, the president, and the Supreme Court. It obviously was also effective as in both of these cases the laws and amendments were made that completed these causes end goals. This tactic is not the only one that King and Stanton had on common, …show more content…
These examples helped those listening that perhaps weren’t part of the minorities King and Stanton were addressing see what these groups were faced with. King does this in his speech when he discusses the trials many African Americans were facing at the time, including police brutality and unlawful detention. These tribulations were extremely prevalent at the time of King 's address throughout all of America. Stanton also does this mainly in her “Declarations of Sentiments and Resolutions” speech. She stresses many examples of how women were being treated unfairly. For example she says things such as, “Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her of all sides” (Stanton 1). These and many more examples help all those looking in from the outside to see the struggle that these people have had to battle against for a majority of their
Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy included an effort between all people to spark legislative and social change in society. Martin Luther King often supported working together with different people to achieve success, and he worked with many people, organizations, and presidential administrations to achieve justice and equality for all citizens. In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream Speech”, he spoke of integration between people of different races. He starts every line with “I Have a Dream” to show that his dream in society right at that time was unattainable. He hoped that his children ...
Martin Luther King Jr. “I Have a Dream” speech was delivered as motivation to fight for their rights and help paint the picture of what America could look like in the future. He does this by in the beginning saying that even though the Emancipation Proclamation was signed African Americans are not treated as normal citizens. By saying this Martin Luther King Jr. was saying we should not just be content with being free from slavery. That now it is time to fight for our rights and to end discrimination because of the color on one’s skin.
Over the centuries, society’s had influential speakers who have incited change for the better. These speakers had the same ambition to sway the public masses to believe in their cause, but how they delivered their message and the action they took is where they differ. Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s Keynote Address to the Seneca Falls Convention on July 19, 1848 and Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech on August 28, 1963 were impactful speeches on the public masses during their era; however, they both had similar goals of achieving rights for their respected groups, there were key differences in the way they went about seeking change. Stanton’s Address was in the nineteenth century, before woman had the right to vote, but the white women had
Not long ago, in the nineteenth century, the words that our forefathers wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “that all men were created equal,” held little value. Human equality was far from a reality. If you were not born a white male, then that phrase did not apply to you. During this period many great leaders and reformers emerged, fighting both for the rights of African Americans and for the rights of women. One of these great leaders was Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Stanton dedicated her entire life to the women’s movement, despite the opposition she received, from both her family and friends. In the course of this paper, I will be taking a critical look at three of Stanton’s most acclaimed speeches “Declaration of Sentiments”, “Solitude of Self”, and “ Home Life”, and develop a claim that the rhetoric in these speeches was an effective tool in advancing the movement as a whole.
When it comes to civil rights, there are two pieces of literature commonly discussed. One of these pieces is Henry David Thoreau’s persuasive lecture On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. In this work, Thoreau discusses how one must combat the government with disobedience of unjust laws and positive friction to create change. The second piece is the commonly known article Letter From a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. This letter covers the ways in which peaceful protest and standing up against injustice can lead to positive results. Both pieces conveyed a similar message of standing up for what is right. The strongest rhetorical methods which Thoreau uses are allusions, logos, ethos and rhetorical questions. However, King’s use of
The “I Have a Dream” speech given and written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was and still is one of the most powerful speeches given. Because of the literary elements used in the speech is gives the audience something to think about and relate to and mixes with their feelings to possibly change their stance on the subject. Because of the serious issues that went on during the civil rights movement, such as separation of public services and unfair treatment to African Americans, something had to be done to end the racial injustice. People did try to prevent the discrimination by gathering marches and leading protests. But one of the largest impacts on this time period was the “I Have a Dream” speech and Dr. King’s use of literary
But before we look at these rhetorical devices employed in the speech in more detail, a brief summary of the discourse may be helpful. It can be divided into two parts. In the first part King depicts the racial injustice in America and calls for action using several themed paragraphs (e.g. “Now is the time to…” and “We can never (cannot) be satisfied…”). The second half conveys King’s hope for a better future where there will be equality between the citizens of America regardless to the color of their skin. This part contains the thesis of the speech: “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.”“ The address finishes with an emotionally rich and competently improvised paragraph themed around freedom.
Although finally getting recognition as an American citizen after years of slavery the authority does not put effort in aiding black people to realize the American Dream. Rather than directly accusing the politicians for their faults, Martin Luther King uses his speech as a way to show America the injustice by bringing
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, he elaborates on the injustices that were wildly plaguing America in the year 1963. Black people all over the country were being treated unfairly, locked up in prison for false crimes, and refused the great opportunities that white people were so lucky to receive. Before the year 1963, President Abraham Lincoln was the last person to make such an impact in the equal treatment of all people, so for about 100 years, blacks had no one to back them in their fight for equal treatment.
In his speech, King uses different types of rhetorical guidelines. He uses them to show his points in a better and easier way to understand .At the beginning he successfully uses a mythos. A mythos has a deep explanatory or symbolic resonance for the audience. In mentioning the Emancipation Proclamation he shows that our ancestors signed a contract, in which all human beings are created equal, and therefore should be treated in the same way as others. He also visualizes his ideas with visual examples, which everybody can understand. “America has given the black population a bad check, which has come back marked insufficient funds”( I Have a Dream)
The tears and complaints of the women who came to my father for legal advice touched my heart and drew my attention to the injustice and cruelty of the laws. I could not understand why my father could not alleviate the sufferings of these women (Elizabeth Cady Stanton: Excerpts from her Autobiography)”. So she grew up hearing these women and hear them coming to try and do something about their rights, so this inspired her to do something to create change. Stanton’s father was against women having rights and what all she had partaken in until 1854 when she was preparing her first speech to the New York Legislator. She went in his office and read him the speech as part of practice and when she looked up he was crying because he had finally realized what it meant to her and how awful it really was that women didn’t have rights. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was one of the most influential women during the women’s suffragist movement. She spoke to crowds of thousands of people and influential people in the government about how women should have equal rights; she even helped create the National Women’s Suffrage Association, along with the help of Susan B.
Although Thoreau and King both correspondingly address these topics of morality and justice throughout their essays, their essays are in no way similar in writing styles, tones, and/or goals. King speaks to his readers about the injustice that is being served to African Americans specifically. He uses an emotional appeal as he pleads his readers to take action to end segregation. This emotional appeal combined with his optimism for freedom sets him and his writing different from that of Thoreau’s. Thoreau’s essay on the other hand, is largely critical of the unfair American Government. Unlike King, Thoreau worriedly speaks to his readers in a distressed, aggravated tone as he reprimands them for following unjust laws. Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing M...
Thought the 1950s and 1960s, the tension between those who agreed and disagreed with segregation and discrimination of African Americans increased. The African American community was sick and tired of just being pushed around, so they began to stand up for themselves. Many people didn’t warm up to this idea, but, due to the many inspiring speeches given throughout the movement by Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and others, they started to involve themselves in the movement. Two of those speeches were “Message to the Grassroots” by Malcolm X and “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King. Even though both people had very different view on how this movement should have been like, they used similar rhetorical techniques in there speeches as a way to
Speeches are a method of persuading people to do something. For Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, their speeches were to bring equality for the people of color. However, their approaches are different. Consequently, the effects may be different. An example of their contrasting differences is a speech from each, King’s “I Have a Dream” and X’s “The Black Revolution”. Their speeches used pathos, a central metaphor, and a warning, but was presented differently.
Throughout King’s speech, he uses the rhetorical mode, pathos, to give the audience an ambience of strong emotions such as sympathy. For example, whites had sympathy for African Americans and parents had sympathy for their children. The way that King tells his speech takes the focus off of race and reestablishes it on the aspiration of a world without racism. “…by making his audience no longer hate Negroes and instead hate racism and wish for a new, better world…” (L., Anson). Dr. King made the audience sympathize with African Americans, helping the audience realize that racist people and bias ideas caused the true dilemma of discrimination. Through making the audience realize this, he also gave them hope for a world reborn without racism, without segregation, without discrimination, and without hate. King wanted his children to live in a world without judgment of race, but with the consideration of personality, for nobody should not endure judgment because of the way that they look. He spoke of his own children, which introduced a reinforced emotional attachment to the audience; this gave many parents a scenario to relate to because no parent wants ...