Comparison Between Skepticism And Moral Objectivism

1415 Words6 Pages
Morality is important in people’s daily lives. It shapes how people think and act. By acting according to some certain moral standards, people are expecting some positive results. With the right moral standards, people will act the right way, and the society will run better. True morality will build a Utopia, which people dream of. Since morality is a complex and abstract idea, people argued about moral standards everyday, and there seems to be no absolute answers. To fully understand why and how some moral standards are right while others are wrong, we need to figure out the base of moral standards. This paper will talk about two philosophy ethical theories: moral skepticism and moral objectivism. Shafer-Landau argues for moral objectivism…show more content…
In other words,moral facts exist as truth that need to be discover. Shafer-Landau endorses moral objectivism in his book. He argues for moral objectivism based on two main points. First, moral objectivism is tolerant and open-minded. Since there is a basic standard that can be compared within objectivism, people can tell right from wrong easily. There are wrong answers in moral issues, and it is fine to be wrong. It is actually tolerance and open-minded for different opinions, which is superior than skepticism. Second, moral facts are general universal norms. To be more specific, they should be virtue guidelines instead of specific rules. It also explain the disagreement of moral issues: maybe what people disagree is the way they portray the general moral facts rather than the facts themselves. In addition, even though there are objective moral truths, it does not mean they have to be…show more content…
In other words, both of subjectivism and relativism believes that moral standards are man-made. We human beings invented moral codes to guide our behavior. On one hand, all the moral codes are suppose to apply to humans, not animals or plants. We are not expect any other species other than us to understand and apply them. As a result, saying that moral codes are human-made makes sense. On the other hand, different people or culture have different moral standards, and the disagreement of morality issues will always exists. Any specific circumstance may change the way people thinks, and solving the problems by going with social norm is a good

More about Comparison Between Skepticism And Moral Objectivism

Open Document