Comparison Between Myth And Religion

1359 Words3 Pages

Religion is a drive to better understand ourselves and access something beyond the ephemeral intellectual grasp. The timeline of religion dates back all the way to circa 223,000 BCE, where we can see evidence of performed funerary ceremonies.(citation) It seems that people have always tried to understand why some religious customs where implicated or even exist to begin with. In "Homo Religiosus," the author, Karen Armstrong, uses examples of historical evidence to try and give the reader her best definition of religion. This elucidation tries to manifest that myth, religion, and art are all one in the same and therefore encompass a subtle connection with one another. Religion is not to understand if there is a god, but to understand what is beyond ourselves. A myth is there to bring sense and a type of order to an otherwise chaotic world. Art, however, is the most natural state of one 's mortal self. Its only purpose is to evoke emotion. After evaluating Armstrong 's textual evidence, it is obvious that Myth and religion are just mere forms of artistic creation. Art is created for those who can understand its meaning. A painting or a poem may have no …show more content…

However, this relationship highly depends on which definition of the word "myth" is used in argument. A myth is defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary as "a usually traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon." It is not so difficult to accept the ideology that a religion is a building upon a myth. Both of these terms refer to some type of high importance to the community that they serve. If a myth loses its connect from the religious system where it contains relevance, it may start to be considered as a legend or even an unfathomable

Open Document