Comparing Women In Much Ado About Nothing And Hamlet

895 Words2 Pages

There is a great contrast between Shakespeare’s portrayal of the strong females in Much Ado About Nothing and the weak females in Hamlet. In comparing the roles of women in these two plays, it is obvious how the differently the women are perceived by other characters. In their respective plays, Beatrice, more often than not, proves she is the epitome of Shakespeare’s powerful female characters, whereas Gertrude portrays herself to be the embodiment of one of Shakespeare’s fragile females. The women in these two plays are obviously different in their actions and desires, and are therefore very different from each other. In Hamlet, Gertrude proves to be a female character who is easily manipulated and incapable of living without someone dictating her life. Hamlet accuses his mother of being too weak and incapable of depending on a man, that she remarries only a month after her husband died. “Frailty, thy name is woman!” (I.ii.150). She is too wrapped up into her reputation and status and her need for affection that she is quick to marry Claudius. However, Hamlet’s accusations prove true when it is obvious that Gertrude doesn’t have the ability to make judgements on her own and would rather choose the easier way out of a situation than too face the obstacles head on. Gertrude is incapable of acting on her own and is quick …show more content…

Gertrude and Ophelia are portrayed as weak woman who can be easily manipulated and need a male figure to depend on, whereas, Beatrice is viewed as a strong woman who can act and think for herself and doesn’t need a man to tell her what she can and cannot do. These women contrast each other’s beliefs and display how women in Shakespeare’s plays were perceived: either contingent on someone else like the women in Hamlet, or capable of thinking and acting freely like the women in Much Ado About

Open Document