Comparing Updike's A And P

611 Words2 Pages

Saldivar approaches Updike’s “A & P” as an ambiguous story that requires quite a bit of interpretation from the reader. Saldivar argues that only a reader with “considerable literary and cultural knowledge” (Saldivar 1) would be able to truly appreciate the contradiction and significance of the story. The analysis Saldivar gives of Sammy’s character focuses specifically on his motivation and breaks his reasoning into three parts. The first and strongest incentive for Sammy to act is the beauty of the girls who enter the store. Regardless of his morals and principles, the fact remains that Sammy is still a nineteen-year-old boy, and the basis for his reaction lies in his physical attraction to the girls. The second motive for Sammy’s actions is his ability to “respond sympathetically and …show more content…

The third motive is the gratification Sammy gains from being able to express his disapproval out loud. The chance for Sammy to speak out and take a stand as an adult is a means to attention and glory, a way to solidify his role as a contributing member of society. As an adolescent who is beginning to form his own opinions and judgments, Sammy cannot pass up this opportunity to make himself heard. Saldivar views Sammy as a protagonist who ends his narrative in a conflicted tone. Sammy loses everything, but gains nothing, and though he is satisfied with his actions, he is also uncertain about the future and what it will hold for him. In the end, Saldivar views Sammy as “both triumphant and sad” (Saldivar 1).
Saldivar’s analysis provides a realistic view of “A & P” by portraying the conflict and sacrifice that Sammy faces. Saldivar does not view Sammy as a hero who, despite the challenges, gave up his job in order to preserve justice and morality. Instead, Saldivar portrays Sammy accurately, as a nineteen-year-old boy whose “romantic desire...though naive and self dramatizing, drives the plot” (Saldivar 3). Sammy is

Open Document