Comparing The Case Of Ex Parte Pieters And The Presumption Of Death

755 Words2 Pages

Critically analyse and compare the cases of Ex Parte Pieters 1993 3 SA 379 (D) and Ex Stoter 1996 4 SA 1299 (E) The presumption of death is when an application to the High Court must be made for an order that a missing person is presumed dead, the court does not declare a person dead but it merely makes an order that the person is presumed dead. In Ex Parte Pieters, the applicant is the son of Mr William Emmanuel Pieters. The applicant sought an order of presuming the death of his father to effect payment to him and his siblings of the moneys left by his deceased mother to the father which was credited in his Guardian’s Fund. In Ex Parte Stoter, the applicant is the brother of Clarence Percival Stoter and he applies for an order for the presumption of death of his brother because he was missing for two years. The missing person never arrived at his daughter’s place and he went missing for 18 years. At the time the applicant applied for an order the missing person would have been 73 years old. The missing person showed no emotional stress, financial embarrassment or any sign of failing health before he disappeared. Mr Pieters had held a variety of jobs and was working as a cleaner at Customs Office the time he disappeared. In Ex Parte Stoter, the circumstances of the missing person were different as he disappeared without a trace from his room, and his motor vehicle was also missing. When the order of presumption for death was applied for the missing person would have been about 61 years old and would have been missing for two years. Before disappearing, missing person suffered from depression and severe blood pressure but nothing showed any failure in health. The day before he disappeared he had been employed by the Federated Timbers in the East

Open Document