Comparing Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin, Turned by Perkins Gilman and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte

1233 Words3 Pages

Comparing Story of an Hour by Kate

Chopin, Turned by Perkins Gilman and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte

In recent times I have compared and comprehended three narratives that

are very close to the position of women throughout the early 19th

century up till the late 20th century. They entirely demonstrate the

changes that have taken place over these eras, and how women acquire

the strength to gain their rightful place in society's social circles.

Two of these are brief tales known as, 'Story of an hour' written by

Kate Chopin and 'Turned' by Perkins Gilman. The third of these stories

is an exhilarating romance novel otherwise known as 'Jane Eyre,'

written by Charlotte Bronte, a timeless classic.

Civilisation in these tome periods where very rigorous towards the

issue of marriage and divorce; the community would disapprove and

condemn it very reprehensibly, and factors such as affairs were looked

upon very inhospitably, in addition, these subject matters meant more

when it involved women. (If a man where to have an affair with another

woman it wouldn't be looked upon as harshly, as it would for a woman

in exactly the same circumstances.)

In 'Story of an Hour' Mrs. Mallard portrays a typical role of the

female sex in the Victorian age; her character is based on what I

would describe as emotional anguish, due to her being restrained in

such excessive orders produced by the opposite sex. She goes through

various changes throughout her sentiments before she dies a sudden

death. I say this because, at the beginning of the story, you see Mrs.

Mallard mournfully grieving over her husbands' death; however she then

realizes that she's bett...

... middle of paper ...

...classed far

superior to woman. This is the attitude that leads to a book or an

author being called feminist, as men think, that it is wrong for woman

to be saying or even writing things that deal with these subject

matters. (In a way they can't handle the truth. It may sound a bit

sexist of me to be saying it, but I think that is the actual reality.)

In conclusion, through thoroughly examining all three stories, I think

its fine judgement to say that no; none of these authors and

characters were feminists and that they succeeded in history to take a

small step for woman's rights and place them in the right position for

gaining freedom and independence. By breaking the barriers of partial

and prejudiced laws, womankind have been able to take a leap into the

future, have a say, and that's why we are where we are today.

Open Document