Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of a villain in literature
Villains in literature essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of a villain in literature
Comparing Fosco and Glyde to Villains A villain is somebody who is devious, cunning, and in most cases he or she is intelligent. In almost all-good English literature there are villains, from the woman in white itself to Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist. Villains usually play a large part in books and are typically two faced, violent, and with only their interests in mind. They play with people's emotions in order to gain the best out of them, and are often multi-faceted. In the woman in White there are two main villains, Count Fosco, and Sir Percival Glyde. Sir Percival Glyde, in the woman in white is a slick and forceful character, and immediately makes his presence known in the book. He is first referred to as 'a gentlemen of large property in Hampshire'. This gives him the image of a well-respected person, which he uses to his advantage. It is soon found out that Sir Percival is a villain and his motive is to gain Laura's inheritance. He would do almost anything to get his own way, but has the disadvantage of not knowing how to be a good villain. For example when Count Fosco speaks of Laura's sudden death, he implies that they would kill her, and this shocks Sir Percival. He would not know how to go about killing a woman, and is obviously not keen on the idea. This shows that Sir Percival does have some morals, however insignificant they may be. A true villain on the other hand is never scared of the consequences of their actions and will not let anything stand in their way to power. We find out further into the book that Sir Percival has bad intentions, and an anonymous letter is sent to Laura, which warns her about him. The... ... middle of paper ... ...re both sacred of the power and control that the two have over them and are also scared of what they could do to them. Fosco, on the other hand is much harder to compare to other well know villains in literature. But if anyone, he is similar to Sykes from Oliver Twist. One reason is that he has supreme control over Percival in a similar way that Fagin does over Sykes. They both start off as intelligent and have decent reputations and use their associate's power to their advantage. To conclude, I believe that a cunning and intelligent mind will always beat brute force and money. I believe that because of Fosco's superior knowledge and control of Sir Percival that Percival does not even stand a chance against a villain such as Fosco. This is why I believe that Count Fosco is more of a villain than Sir Percival Glyde.
He did not choose to have this way of life, but is forced by his
someone to tell him what to do, and if they did tell him what to do he often wouldn't do it. This
does not have faith in his ability to walk, he persists anyway. This is because he wants
...an to want more from his environment and through looking at what the rest of the world had to offer it caused him to desire change and growth and to search for it. What he had compared to others was not satisfying, not good enough, causing him to despise what he had.
he wishes he could be more honorable. It shows King Henry's lack of trust and
his pride in lack of fear and thought that he was not scared of him.
What is he searching for? What is his attitude toward his quest? What do these details suggest to you about his character?
self-centered. His life is the mirror of a Greed Tragedy. In his case, the flaw
The bulk of the praise a hero receives tends to be in response to his or her actions. People look up to the heroes who can perform the most miraculous feats. However, there is an element of heroism beyond the superficial element of a hero’s actions: the hero’s character. Both heroes and antiheroes might do great things; however, the similarities end where motivations are considered, and these differences in motivations are rooted in the differences in the character of heroes and the antiheroes. An antihero’s character is flawed, leading to actions based on selfish and impure motivations. In contrast, a hero is characterized by his or her selflessness; this can be defined as putting the interests of others above the interests of oneself, and
(80); moreover he always acted on his own, and he had his own mind-set. Equality opposed his
pride in his job, but is not entirely sure why he does what he does. Instead of
does not realize it until he is driven mad by it. His aspirations at first look may
pride. I agree with Aristotle that he brings it all on to himself because of
Who is the Greater Villain – Godfrey or Dunstan? My understanding of a villain is a wicked person or some one who tricks someone. In the dictionary a “villain” is defined as a person who is guilty or capable of great wickedness or a criminal. My impressions of Godfrey are that he is weak, however he also has qualities of a villain as well. Godfrey’s younger brother Dunstan is not like Godfrey and he us more like a villain than weak.
He thinks and acts, whether that is as an individual or as a group who share interests, with foremost regard to his own interests. Self-perpetuation is the number one rule. He therefore possesses his own interests, ideas and preferences, which may