Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Flashcards.com/consideration in contract law
Flashcards.com/consideration in contract law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Flashcards.com/consideration in contract law
DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN EXECUTED CONSIDERATION AND PAST CONSIDERATION
Consideration is one of the three main building blocks of a contract in English contract law and it is the exchange of benefit and detriment e.g., the making of a promise in exchange for an act or it can be anything of value such as an item or service which each party to a legally-binding contract must agree to exchange if the contract is to be valid. If only one party offers consideration, the agreement is not legally a binding contract. In its traditional form, consideration is expressed as the requirement that in order for parties to be able to enforce a promise, they must have given something for it (quid pro quo): something must be given or promised in exchange or return for the promise. A contract must be "met with" or "supported by" consideration to be enforceable; also, only a person who has provided consideration can enforce a contract. In other words, if an arrangement consists of a promise which is not supported by consideration, then the arrangement is not a legally enforceable contract.
EXECUTED CONSIDERATION
When a promise is made in exchange for an act, when that act is performed, it is executed consideration for example when you go to a bakery and ask the baker to make you a birthday cake and you pay for his services in advance then we can call the payment Executed consideration for the bakers promise to make the cake.
PAST CONSIDERATION
If a party voluntarily acts and then the other party makes a promise, the act is said to be "past consideration" since the act was already performed and not made in exchange for the promise. For example Korir gives Boit a ride to the market and back home. When Korir delivers Boit to his house, Boit promises to give Korir some money to buy a new rim. Korir cannot sue Boit to enforce Boit's promise since the consideration (Korir's act of giving Boit a ride) occurred before Boit's promise. Korir gave Boit the ride without expecting anything in return. (Korir did not give Boit a ride in exchange for Boit giving Korir money hence past consideration is of no effect to consideration at all.
For example In Eastwood v Kenyon, the guardian of a young girl raised a loan to educate the girl and to improve her marriage prospects. After her marriage, her husband promised to pay off the loan. It was held that the guardian could not enforce the promise as taking out the loan to raise and educate the girl was past consideration, because it was completed before the husband promised to repay it.
Defining Issue: In order to make an agreement binding one element that must be used is consideration. Without consideration an agreement may not be enforceable, even if there has been an offer and acceptance. What a promiser demands and receives is the price for the promise, which is consideration. A person who makes the promise is called the promisor, while the person to whom the promise is made to is called the promisee. However, the promisor is not entitled to consideration.
Answer: Judgment for Alfalfa. Alfalfa was in trouble when he was climbing and Darla rescued him from an almost certain serious injury or death. It was a legally sufficient value since Darla did not have to perform such an act, but she did. Afterwards, Alfalfa promised her a check of $1,000, which qualifies for a bargained-for exchange. However, this promise was made in the event when the action already took place. Therefore, there is a past consideration and does not need to be enforced.
When past services are rendered with a promise to pay, the court may enforce the promise to pay. However in Dementas’s case, the service was rendered after the promise to pay. The court found that Dementas’s services were rendered with no expectation of payment from Tallas. Moral obligation was created after some courts found the ruling to be too harsh. Even if moral obligation was applied to Dementas’s case, the court found that Dementas performed all services without expecting any payments in
If a breach of contract is both material and opportunistic, the injured promisee has a claim in restitution to the profit realized by the defaulting promisor as a result of the breach. Liability in restitution with disgorgement of profit is an alternative to liability for contract damages measured by injury to the promisee.
Both party must give consideration. In unilateral contract, the offeror’s promise must be exchanged with the offeree’s performance.
For example, "A promises B that he would not enforce his legal rights and B acted and relied on it without giving any consideration, equity would not allow A to renege on his promise to B" (LawTeacher, n.d.).
Contracts are legally enforceable promises. There are two requirements for contract formation: agreement and consideration. An agreement involves a valid offer being made by an offeror to an offeree and said offer being validly accepted by the offeree and communicated to the offeror. The second requirement is consideration, meaning the two parties exchange something of legal value. Contracts serve the purpose of ensuring stability, predictability, and certainty, as well as deterring defection, in business dealings. The objective theory of contract law states that only the language of the contract should be considered in contract interpretation. This theory ignores entirely the intent of the parties. However, contract law is largely
In my opinion, Consideration is the essential element for the formation of contract. As we know that a contract is based on the promise and for there must be two parties to the contract a promisor and a promisee and when both the parties gain something from one and another then the gain or the benefit received by the parties is called consideration. It should be something which has some value in the eyes of law and it is not one sided as there are two parties of the contract so the consideration comes from both the sides and in case, if it's one sided that will be considered as a gift and the law also does not take into account. if something is done in terms of promise, love, affection and this can be seen from the case Currie v. Missa (1875) where one of the judge also gave importance to the interest, profit, benefits arising to the parties. In bilateral type of contract, an agreement contains mutual promises and sufficient consideration of the parties to form a contract. Whereas in unilateral type of contract, an agreement in which one party promises to ot...
It can also be the promise to pay. For an enforceable contract, the consideration provided must be agreed upon by all parties. In the Jim and Laura case, there is no contract. For a contract to be present and enforceable, an offer must be made. The offer was made as the two parties discussed on purchasing the car and even the party being offered the car left with the car. This offer, however, lacks merit because the proposal was not specific. The two parties did not have a common mind on how to purchase the car. It can also be established that there was no contract mutuality of obligation was not existent (Kurtz & Boone, 2009. The buyers had not agreed to the terms. The terms as explained later by Stan were not the same that Jim and Laura heard in the first instance. Time of agreement is also not detailed. This element has not met at all and, therefore, there was no contract. Consideration plays a big role in law of contract. Businesses are very specific on what ensuring revenues are high all year round. As a result, consideration is critical because it has the ability to tilt profitability of a company. During contracting, considerations must be understood by all parties and agreed upon. In this case, Jim and Laura never agreed on any considerations. They in fact did not know whether there were considerations that were presented to them. This is enough to claim that there was no contract. For there to be a
I interpret consideration as each party must receive something in value as a result of entering this contract. Consideration is a promise to do something that you are not legally obligated to do or perform. Examples of consideration would an Adult film star who signs a contract to perform on camera. As a result of this she is paid an agreed upon amount and receives portions of the video sales. The other party in this type of contract would receive the majority of the video sales for entering this contract. In the end, both parties receive a substantial amount of money; they did not have prior to entering this contract.
The making of a promise involves the voluntary giving of one's word that, if and when a particular circumstance or situation comes about, one will undertake to act in a manner defined by the terms of the promise one has given. The act of making the promise, in other words, implies a willingness to keep it. What is being agreed is that, on the basis of something said in the past, one's future actions will, insofar as the future is foreseeable, follow a particular course and no other.
The most authoritative definition of consideration stems from Currie v Misa in which the judgement of Lord Justice Lush defines consideration as “some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.” Consideration is therefore, in essence, the price for which a promise is bought. Normally, a promise cannot be contractually binding unless it is supported by some form of consideration and there are numerous rules surrounding it’s successful operation. These include: consideration must move from the promisee, consideration must not be past and consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate.
The English contract Offer and Acceptance General principles There are three basic essentials to the creation of a contract which will be recognised and enforced by the courts. These are: contractual intention, agreement and consideration. The Definition of an Offer. This is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention (actual or apparent) that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as the person to whom it is addressed accepts it. An offer can be made to one person or a group of persons, or to the world at large.
A contract is an agreement which has its specified terms and conditions between two or more parties in which there is a promise to do something in return for a benefit.
In English Law consideration is one of the three main areas of an enforceable contract. It may be defined as an act, forbearance or promise made by a single party that constitutes the price for which the promise of another, is bought. In simple terms, the basic understanding of consideration may be seen as a ‘give and take’ tactic between two parties.