Comparing Buddha's View Of The Four Noble Truths And The Eightfold Path

1314 Words3 Pages

The Buddha’s view of the four noble truths and the eightfold path are relevant to Aristotle’s view of the good life. Nel Noddings…. Aristotle and his Nichomachean Ethics outlines a method for living a full and happy life. One of his key ideological concepts is that happiness is the universal, ultimate human good. He acknowledges that although happiness may be relative, it is the still the ultimate good that we all strive for, in one way or another. He argues that it is the ultimate good, as happiness is self-sufficient and one does not seek happiness for the sake of something else. The pursuit of other things, such as wealth is just pursued because of the happiness and contentment that will bring. Essentially, he views happiness as an end …show more content…

The eight fold path comparison can also be a contrasting point, as the following the eight fold path implies the four noble truths. The Buddha, within the four noble truths, says that in order to live a life without suffering, you must eliminate the desire that creates suffering. Aristotle would argue that desire is at the heart of finding happiness. You can only find happiness when you desire for it and actively seek it through virtuous actions. This is even how Aristotle proves that happiness is the ultimate good. He argues that because the desire for happiness is pure, in the sense that it is only desired for its own sake. The Buddha would clearly argue this point, as he believed all desire would lead to suffering. The Buddha would most likely claim that desire and crave for happiness is what causes suffering and …show more content…

Nel Noddings' main concept is that of care ethics. This states that ethics are rooted in a basic sense of care for others and that ethics starts with natural caring. Our actions are based on a level of care and sympathy that we have with others. Essentially, she believes that this feeling of care is what drives us to act. She also believes that right and wrong is based on context. For instance, stealing can be justified under certain circumstances that may indicate good intentions. She does not necessarily believe that everything is always ever good or bad depending on the situation. This aligns perfectly with Aristotle's Doctrine of the Mean. The thought that care drives our actions can be thought of as having an excess and a deficiency, which is necessary for the theory. The excess being an overwhelming amount of care for the person or object in question. This can be detrimental because the actor may behave irrationally and attempt to do to much or to do something that is better left to another. To the other extreme, a deficiency or lack in care may lead to inaction where action is needed. Only by the finding the middle and balancing the amount of care that we feel can we find the right action and act

Open Document