Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
conclusion of atkins diet
atkins diet research paper
conclusion of atkins diet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: conclusion of atkins diet
Comparing Atkins and Weight Watchers Diets
Of the many diets on the market today, Atkins and Weight Watchers have a
huge following. The followers of these two diets must adopt very
different eating plans. You must decide before going on one of these,
which advantages are you looking for and which disadvantages can you live
with.
The Atkins diet works on the notion that weight gain is caused not
by fat intake or food portions, but the way our bodies break down
carbohydrates (betterhealthusa.com). Carbohydrates will turn to fat if
not burned by the body. If your body does not get enough carbohydrates,
it will use stored fat. Atkins dieters are told not to eat
carbohydrates in order to burn their stored fat, causing weight loss.
This diet has some advantages and disadvantages. Dieters will notice in
the first weeks of this plan that their weight comes off rapidly. Much of
this weight is water. In these first weeks, total carbohydrate intake is
less than 20 grams. One apple has 21 grams. You may eat all the meats
and cheeses you desire. There is...
Many times readers lose interest in stories that they feel are not authentic. In addition, readers feel that fictitious novels and stories are for children and lack depth. Tim O’ Brien maintains that keeping readers of fiction entertained is a most daunting task, “The problem with unsuccessful stories is usually simple: they are boring, a consequence of the failure of imagination- to vividly imagine and to vividly render extraordinary human events, or sequences of events, is the hard-lifting, heavy-duty, day-by-day, unending labor of a fiction writer” (Tim O’ Brien 623). Tim O’ Brien’s “How to Tell a True War Story” examines the correlation between the real experiences of war and the art of storytelling. In O’Brien’s attempt to bridge the gap between fiction and non-fiction the narrator of the story uses language and acts of violence that may be offensive to some. However some readers agree that Tim O" Brien's "How to Tell a True War Story" would lack authenticity and power without the use of crude language and violence.
Tim O’Brien’s ultimate purpose is to detract the fine line between fiction and reality. In order to fully grasp what a true war story consists of, the definition of true must be deciphered. O’Brien seems to believe that it does not need to be pure facts. Instead, it is mostly found in the imagination of the individual. Readers need to receive a story based on the truth in its overall purpose and meaning. It just needs to feel true. The author implies that it is not important whether the event actually occurred or not, because if the reader wants to believe it that badly, the feeling of truth will always be present.
Comparing Atkins and Balance Energy Bars Many are fascinated by the various diets in society; people want to lose weight by finding a reliable method that will ensure results. Two common diets include the Atkins Diet and the Zone Diet. Both of these have energy bars that contain the nutrients need to meet the diets specific requirements. In the article “Glycemic and Insulinemic responses to energy bars of differing macronutrient composition in healthy adults,” by Steven Hetzler and Veonsoo Kim, a study was conducted that compared the different energy bars. The study looked at equal proportions of these bars to see their effects on glycemic and insulinemic levels.
O'Brien's writing style is so vivid, the reader frequently finds himself accepting the events and details of this novel as absolute fact. To contrast truth and fiction, the author inserts reminders that the stories are not fact, but are mere representations of human emotion incommunicable as fact.
The truth behind stories is not always what happened, with each person 's perspective is where their truth lies. In the beginning of the novel, you start to think that it is going to be the same old war stories you read in the past, but it changes direction early. It is not about how the hero saves the day, but how each experience is different and how it stays with you. From his story about Martha, to how he killed a man, each one is so different, but has its own meaning that makes people who have not been in war, understand what it is like. Tim O’Brien can tell a fake story and make you believe it with no doubt in your mind. He does this throughout the novel. In The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien distinguishes truth from fantasy and the
...nts it through a disastrous love story it catches reader’s attention. Riley uses Mary Anne as a symbolize for regular people, who are unexposed to war. But when Mary Anne is exposed to war’s grasp her whole persona changes. Riley changes the genuine story of how war changes people because he understands that a love story gone wrong is more interesting. Modifying the truth for popularity approbation should not be conducted because the truth is then gone. O’Brien modifies his stories’ authenticity to catch reader’s approbation, this causes his stories to lose their honesty. Facts that are altered are no longer facts.
...ents a story truth, one that tells the truth in regards to sensation and emotion. This is represented when the narrator says “makes the story seem untrue, but which in fact represents the hard exact truth”(O’Brien pg. 68). O’Brien shows that it matters not that a story is fiction, so long as it represents the truth as it seemed.
The female heroine, whose eyes most of the third person omniscient novel is seen through is Elizabeth Bennet. While she accepts and acknowledges many of the social expectations, especially manners, others she challenges profusely. Jane Austen is most likely channelling her views through this character and commenting on the lifestyle and values she was brought up with. One of the reasons Mr Darcy falls in love with Elizabeth is because she has an intelligence and openness of mind, ‘you were always dis...
O’Brien subjectifies truth by obscuring both fact and fiction within his storytelling. In each story he tells there is some fuzziness in what actually happened. There are two types of truths in this novel, “story-truth” and “happening-truth” (173). “Happening-truth” is what happened in the moment and “story-truth” is the way the storyteller reflects and interprets a situation. O’Brien uses these two types of truths to blur out the difference between fact and fiction. For example, when Rat Kiley tells a story he always overexaggerates. He does this because “he wanted to heat up the truth, to make it burn so hot that you would feel exactly what he felt,” (85). This is the same for most storytellers, even O’Brien. When he tells the story of Norman Bowker he makes his own truth stating, “He did not freeze up or lose the Silver Star for valor. That part of the story is my own” (154). Not everything that O’Brien said was fact, however, it made the the meaning of the story effective and significant. O’Brien reveals that he never killed a man after devoting a whole short story to “The Man I Killed.” When his daughter asks “Daddy, tell the truth, did you ever kill anybody?” he can honestly say “Of course not,” or “Yes,” (172). This illustrates the subjectivity of truth, how both truths can in fact be true. This goes for all the stories told in this novel, the truth is held in the storyteller 's
...r because it seems impossible to reconstruct an event from this objective point of view. Maybe the point of telling stories is not trying to recreate the reality of a past event, but it is the message that matters because that might be in the end the only thing that does not necessarily depend on single details of the story, but on the overall picture of an event. That is why to O’Brien another important component of a war story is the fact that a war story will never pin down the definite truth and that is why a true war story “never seems to end” (O’Brien, 425). O’Brien moves the reader from the short and simple statement “This is the truth” to the conclusion that, “In war you lose your sense of the definite, hence your sense of truth itself and therefore it’s safe to say that in a true war story nohting much is ever very true” (O’Brien, 428). These two statements frame the entire irony of the story, from its beginning to its end. Almost like the popular saying “A wise man admits that he knows nothing.”
Stories, both factual and manipulated, present different things to a reader. Factual writings help readers visualize the actual moment, but may not have them feeling the same as the author felt. Manipulated writings however, are superior in the fact that emotion through writing can actually help readers see a situation for what it really is. Distortions in manipulated writing are beneficial to the reader by providing more sensory imagery, even if it costs presenting the complete truth.
What O’Brien sees as the purpose of the storytelling, and fictionalizing his experiences in Vietnam, can be seen through the “style” of his writing. It’s more than just a collection of stories. It’s a way for him to let go and start a new beginning. It is labeled “fiction” to make the story seem more engaging and to bring up the question, “Did this really happen?”
Although the soldiers were united and served for the same goal, each of the men had a different motivation. For O’Brien, his motivation to join the war was the shame of running away. Almost all of the characters were afraid of being ashamed, and that served as a drive for them to do acts of heroism and similarly acts of stupidity. For example, in the story “On the Rainy River”, shame drove O’Brien to do an act of heroism as a fear of being ashamed. O’Brien wrote “For more than twenty years I 've had to live with it, feeling the shame, trying to
In this Library, there is an almost infinite amount of hexagonal rooms each filled with a set amount of books and every book is different from the other in some way (Interestingly, the number of books can be computed as [410 pages x 40 lines x 80 characters=1,312,000 characters in a book and since the books use 25 types of characters, then the number of books theoretically would be 251,312,000 books] (“How big is the library of Babel?” Daylight Atheism)). There are spiral staircases connecting the hexagonal rooms and crushingly vast air shafts in-between the hexagons. The source of light in the Library is produced by lamps above the hexagons. Borges introduces two types of people that reside in the Library, the Idealists and the Mystics. The Mystics, through their ecstasy, believe that there is a circular room somewhere in the Library that contains the book of all books. Since this book is circular and enclosed in an infinite binding, this book is inaccessible. Mystics are actually similar to people who follow monotheistic religions. They both believe in a single divine entity that exists in their respective univers...
Experiment #3: The purpose of this experiment to test the chromatography of plant pigments the alcohol test strip test will be used.