Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About texting and social communication
Positives and negatives of texting in communication
Positives and negatives of texting in communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About texting and social communication
In both Aristotle and Ong’s works, there lies an importance on how orality is key in communication. However, in a modern day setting, there exists now the accessible, instant form of communication, almost akin to verbal language in the form of text messages. Personally, I remember the peak of instant messaging occurring around the age of middle school, where many had flip phones or other such devices. Nowadays, rarely anyone does not possess a mobile phone, and even flip phones are now obsolete, replaced with touch screen devices. Texting itself is not harmful, especially if one utilizes with proper English grammar, but “textspeak” on the contrary is missing such rules. Specifically, this language is created to function “as shortcuts to reduce …show more content…
A study by Soloman Dansieh tackles this exact problem, to see if truly texting has an impact on communication skills. There were 430 questionnaires that were filled out by 400 students and 30 lectures at Wa Polytechnic, a university. The results of this study found that “83% of [students] and 70% of lecturers in the survey admitted that SMS language [could] harm their writing skills” (Dansieh 228). In addition to this study, it has been found that overall “77% percent of adolescents own cell phones, 63% communicate via text messaging every day, and 49% send and receive text messages with friends every day” (Underwood 101). Thus, it can be inferred that texting is an unavoidable form of communication. Being aware of this, as well as the potential impact that some have discovered on language, this relates back to the fears and warnings of both Aristotle and Ong in regards to rhetoric and …show more content…
For Aristotle, this form of communication may allow for a poor use of rhetoric, as well as occasions where manipulation occurs. Walter Ong believes that technology has changed our language, and we have lost touch with orality with literacy. Despite both of these critiques on modern language, there is more of an emphasis on perhaps learning about how technology impacts our speech rather than dismissing it all together. There is the ability to have a successful orality and literacy when one is aware and embraces technology for its hindrances and improvements. For my career, I now feel prepared to face others who may have lost a level of oral communication because of technology, and I plan to try my hardest to overcome the barriers that may present
People’s lives are influenced by the lack of communicating. For example, in Hamilton Spectator’s article Wired For the Future, the writer explains the negative effects caused by the lack of communicating by saying, “[i]f teens stop communicating with their friends and others face to face, they will lose the ability to navigate complex social situations and that could be devastating for them when they are faced with college and job interviews....” (Hamilton Spectator 2). In other words, that when people keep forgetting how to communicate by overly using messaging systems, it could lead to negative problems in their lives: interviews or meeting with delegates. Those are important to people’s lives, because when children are independent and working in their jobs, they have to socialize with others. Communicating is unavoidable in social life, because people still communicate even though texting and messaging are taking enormous space in our world. In addition, People text too much without talking and communicating face to face. For instance, in Jessica Mazzola’s article Nighttime Texting, she showed the surveyed data of texting by saying, “...American teens send and receive an average of 1,500 texts per month” (Mazzola 1). By all means, texting is rooted deeply in people’s lives and replaced where real conversations should be. As the article mentioned, 1,500 texts per month should be affecting people’s lives directly. Communicating face-to-face and real conversations are certainly reduced dramatically as the texting increases. Therefore, people get influenced by the erosion of
Texting however keeps people at arm’s length and prevents relationships from getting past a certain level of rapport. Text messages help people create distance between them and another person. This distance can lead to many things, like lost friendship. Friendships can be lost in text messages because of tone. I was texting my sister one day, who types in all capital letters, and finally halfway through the conversation I asked her why she was yelling at me, because that is how I was reading them, as me being yelled at. When she responded she was very confused, and told me that she didn’t realize that she had been yelling at me and was sorry. This can happen to anybody. People can confuse tone in text messages, and that can lead to one person arguing with someone who has no idea that they are in a fight. Text messages are also used by people to purposely keep others away from them, and by some it is used to hide. Alice G Walton, a science journalist with a Ph.D. in Biopsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience says, “People like to text because the message gives them the ability to hide,” (Walton). It is like the saying “a drunken mind speaks a sober heart,” When people are drunk they hide behind being it, and use alcohol as their mask, but when they are texting, it’s the phone. They are able to say what they would like, without having to actually face the person they are talking to, and
Three years ago, linguist John McWhorter spoke at a Ted Talk conference about whether texting is killing language and went so far as to question the definition of language itself. His video, “John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!!” distinguished to the reader the difference between writing and speaking and how texting was one in the form of another. Texting, he said, is a way of writing as one speaks, or specifically fingered speech, rather than as many believe, a mutilated version of the English language. According to McWhorter, texting is becoming a second language for many people, and those who do text are actually, in a sense, being bilingual. Texting itself is not very different from a foreign language, other than for its strong
Numerous studies have shown how texting can actually improve our literacy skills. In the article “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, he believes that is a new form of communication and will not harm our language in any way. He states that a study has proven people who use a lot of abbreviations in their text messages tend to score higher on reading and vocabulary test. According to David Crystal, to be able to write well the first thing you have to know is how letters relate to sounds throughout each language.
Turkle warns that too much texting can lead to generations hiding behind screens and becoming completely isolated. As technology advances, the world becomes less social and more sheltered behind screens. When texting becomes a main source of communication, there can be words that are lost in transition. People will often take your words and contort them to make it either sound better or worse, depending on the topic of conversation. These twisted words can be used against you and make you look extremely different from what you wanted.
In cullington’s article, it is evident textspeak has led to an increase in the neglect of punctuation, grammatical errors, and lack of emotion in formal writing. However, another argument comes up that textspeak is beneficial to students’ writing skills. Such an argument sees textspeak as a way of self-expression that allows an individual to create a voice that is carefully expressed and constructed. As such, textspeak, as brought by new technologies spurs creativity and supports the utilization of creative thinking skills to allow the students to come up with new ways of expressing themselves. Additionally, Cullington’s article acknowledges the accomplishment of the creation and invention of the new language of communication.
As explained in The Global Achievement Gap by Tony Wagner, “there is a core set of survival skills for today’s workplace, as well as for lifelong learning and active citizenship” (14). One of the seven skills Wagner listed can be tied directly to social media and how it hinders the development of strong communication skills. Instead of having a face to face conversation, teens are sending messages as a means of communication without the actual verbal part. Texting has made communication easier for young Americans by making unpleasant phone conversations a thing of the past and making a quick “Hello” much easier. This trend slowly builds a habit of poor communication skills. As previously mentioned, 75% of teenagers text regularly, and one in three sends more than 100 texts per day. We can see that texting is the preferred method of communication among young people. To make messages quick and maintain a steady flow of conversation, acronyms and dropping nonessential letters are used to shorten messages. Instead of typing out “laugh out loud” they’ll use acronyms like “LOL” to signify they find it amusing.. They’ll also use homophones like “gr8” for “great” and drop letters from words like “would” to make “wud”. It is obvious to see why texting and messaging through social networks negatively
In John McWhorter’s argumentative speech “Txtng is killing language. JK!!!!” he uses logical and emotional appeals to showcase his argument. He begins by explaining the roles of speech and writing in language, stating that there is a natural amount of bleed between the two linguistic methods. Throughout the speech he compels his audience by using primarily logical appeals, such as since it is typical to “speak like you write” then it must be possible to “write like you speak.” John McWhorter uses historical knowledge and linguistic research, building a logical claim that texting is creating a newer advanced level of digital speech.
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
Chast shows two young teens on their laptop, chatting with each other while they are sitting in the same room, separated by a text box. By using slang in the dialogue, Chast is implying that our society’s communication skills are becoming lazy and incorrect in terms of grammar. Also, his dialogue contrasts entirely with the work of William Shakespeare, who uses complex language, unlike Chast who uses abbreviations. The picture depicts that teens are blinded by technology and do not focus on other important things such as communal relationships with family and friends. I would use this in an essay to display the lack of face to face communication that is developing in today’s world. To continue, I would argue that the diminishing use of verbal communication is a disadvantage rather than an
It's taking over our lives. We can do it almost anywhere. What is it? It's texting! Texting is a reliable, easy and convenient form of communication that is most commonly used by, but not limited to millenials and those in the workforce. Many people use it as a way to express themselves as well. In Michaela Cullington’s article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she targets two different attitudes in relation to texting. Cullington explains that there is often an assumption that students who use abbreviations when they text, will bring those same abbreviations over to their formal writing pieces. Cullington then adds that the other attitude in relation to writing skills and texting insists that texting is harming student’s writing capabilities. Because of her research as well as experiments done by other colleagues of hers, it shows that
These major changes show in the classroom. Texting affects students in the classroom, and the teachers.
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
You can say that overuse in texting is determination the way teens, students write formally in the classroom. Teens that spend most of their eyes on their phone has already created their own texting style. Now I am able to answer the question, how does texting affect teen literacy? Texting affects teen literacy because, text messaging does affect our grammar because, teens text like for example; “ttyl”, “gtg”, “wyd”. They find an easy way of texting rather than using the correct way. In order to get what they want done, we wanted to see and learn about the damage that texting can cause on teens and we did learn, we learned that it can affect our grammar, grades, and even your future in trying to get a job, your skills in so much more. I wanted to inform the teens about the damage that texting in short terms can do to you. Encourage them not to write in short term because, they are too
Rosenberg, Tina. "Everyone Speaks Text Message." 2011. First-Year Writing: Writing in the Disciplines. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 267-271. Print.