Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity

1798 Words4 Pages

Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity
Validity is an important aspect of the research design. For instance, in research the uses statistics as the primary form of measurement. Validity applies to the truth of a standard. A measure is valid, in general, when it (Renata, 2011, 1) includes what it devised to measure. Renata (2011) explained, "Internal and external validity are the two primary types of validity" (para. 1). However, both display diverse aspects of a study’s design and results.
In order to distinguish internal and external validity, it is essential to understand what the term validity itself means with respect to research design. Validity applies to the truth or likely truth of a deductive debate. Alexander (2007) goes on to describe, “An argument is a set of statements implying true or false facts and a conclusion that derives from the statements” (para. 1). Support can be supplied to a set of circumstances that head to a conclusion or verdict, which is how the constitutional system operations. Alexander (227) asserts "Either the evidence supports the conclusion, or it does not, hence giving it validity or not" (para. 1). For example, all men are mortal, or James is a man. True arguments considered deductive. Arguments that probably are true said to be inductive. Alexander (2007) revealed, “Even when arguments seem to be valid, the question of logic should be introduced as added insurance that an argument is solid” (para. 2). A dispute is deductively legitimate when it has all true premises and conclusion. In instances where the premises are accurate, but the completion is wrong, the dispute shifts to indefensible.
Overall, there are many various types of validity, altho...

... middle of paper ...

...feScript.com
Leed, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical Research: Planning and Design (9 ed.). New Jersey, New York , United States of America: Merrill.
MacKenzie, S. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 323-326. doi:10.1177/0092070303031003011
McCroskey, J. R. (2006). An introduction to communication in the class:The role of communication in teaching and training . Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
Renata, R. (2011, Spetember 11). eHow: What is the Difference Between Internal and External Validity of Researcg Study Design? Retrieved December 10, 2013 , from What is the Difference Between Internal and External Validity of Researcg Study Design?: http://www.eHow.com
White, D. a. (1965). Construction of confounding plans for mixed factorial design . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 36, 1256-1271.

More about Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity

Open Document