Compare Prelude And Morning At The Window

1239 Words3 Pages

The way that the city is encountered at night can be compared with to how it is encountered at day in the poems ‘Prelude’ and ‘Morning at the Window’. The city is described similarly to each other. In ‘Preludes’ the streets in the morning as are described as “sawdust-trampled” (II, line 16) which is reminiscent of the description of the “sawdust restaurants” (line 7) in ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’. The “waves of brown fog” (line 5) in ‘Morning at the Window’ parallels the “yellow fog” (line 15) in ‘Prufrock’. An eerie tone of ‘Morning at the Window’ is created through the repetition of ethereal language throughout the poem. The fog tossing up faces from the street gives an impression of ghosts or spirits. The use of the word “twisted” …show more content…

Judith Myers Hoover interprets part of Prufrock’s indecision and self-consciousness to being related to whether he should go to a brothel (pg. 16) and while this could be debatable insinuations of prostitution partially more overt in ‘Rhapsody of a Windy Night’ whereby a woman, also out at night, enters into a building. The woman’s dress is described as “torn and stained” (line 20) and so we can deduce that she most likely comes from poverty. We can also question why a woman would be out at night by herself. This is something that we would find stranger than we would Prufrock being out at night by himself in virtue of the fact that women have more dangers to think of when it concerns their safety at night. And so for this poor women to be outside by herself there must be a particular reason. Furthermore the door is described as “open[ing] on her like a grin” (line 18) and the idea of the door grinning is quite ominous and so we would not associate the building going into as positive. It would not be absurd to consider this woman as a prostitute and for the building that she is entering wither being a brothel or a client’s house. And so both ‘Prufrock’ and ‘Rhapsody of a Windy Night’ gives implicit suggestions of prostitution, and these are the only mentions of any kind of relationship that occurs in either of these poems. Hoover describe the relationship with a prostitute as “the city-wise substitute for true love and commitment” (pg. 16) and as it still only speculative whether either poems are portraying prostitution even then there may not be any relationships at all even meaningless, fake

Open Document