Compare And Summary: Idealistic Communism And Equality

793 Words2 Pages

Idealistic Communism and Equality Since the emergence of husbandry there has been increasing political inequality. There have been many who have theorized on ways to minimize or completely eliminate this inequality two of the most notable theorists being Karl Marx and Giuseppe Mazzini. Karl Marx and his theory of communism was more correct on how to solve the problems of European society. He was more correct because he showed more concern for members of the lower class, there are serious flaws in nationalism that are harmful to society, and because it is a system that could be implemented in stages or even partially. Both Karl Marx and Giuseppe Mazzini wrote literature on what they believed to be the best way to ensure that there was more …show more content…

In his book The Communist Manifesto, he claimed that the struggle between the classes was the real struggle in Europe, not the invading nations or absolutist monarchs. Marx viewed nationalism as a movement of the bourgeoisie to gain more power and to further subjugate the lower class. While absolutist monarchies and invading rulers clearly perpetuate inequality, what Mazzini failed to acknowledge was that there was tremendous inequality in places where there was no absolutist monarchies or ruling invading bodies, such as in the United States and England. These countries were the epitome of nationalism, and yet they still experienced gross inequality between social classes. This is something that Marx was able to recognize because of this he held that there needed to be radical changes in the system of how the state was run in order to ensure equality between the classes. In The Communist Manifesto he asserted that the only way to ensure this equality between classes was to abolish all social classes and to have all capital and means of production in the hand of the …show more content…

For example, nationalism can bring about racism and a greater us versus them mentality. This creates a greater inequality among those that society does not recognize as members of their nation. Furthermore, small disputes between nations were then viewed as personal attacks and were not so easily dismissed which resulted in more wars. In many ways nationalism also tightened the chains among the lower class because not only did they have to work for ridiculously low wages, but they also felt compelled to work for these wages and in terrible conditions for the benefit of their

Open Document