Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
resource allocation problem in economics
compare and contrast command and free market economy
command economy vs free market
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: resource allocation problem in economics
Compare And Contrast Two Alternative Systems Of Resource Allocation In The Economy
Economics can be said to be the science which studies the relationship between scarce resources, with alternative uses, and consumers’ unlimited wants. Therefore the ‘problem’ of resource allocation can be seen to be central to the basic economic problem. In this way , how resources are allocated throughout an economy is of great importance and different types of economies employ different methods to achieve this allocation.
All economies have this same basic economic problem of ‘what’ to produce, ‘how’ to produce it, and ‘for whom’ to produce it. Deciding what to produce involves choosing a certain allocation of resources, in order to produce a particular combination of goods. The method of choosing the resource allocation varies, according to the economy in question. There is also the question of how to produce the goods which you require. ‘Any particular output can usually be produced by several different techniques, ranging from ones using a large quantity of labour and only a few simple machines, to ones using a large quantity of automated machines and only a few workers.’ (R.G.Lipsey; 1989) Different economies also vary in the way that national product is distributed throughout the individuals and groups within the society.
The methods which a society uses in order to tackle these questions determines the type of economy it is. There are various methods of resource allocation and the two most extreme cases are the contrasting methods of the ‘free-market’ and the ‘command’ economies.
‘In a market economy, the allocation of resources is the outcome of millions of independent decisions made by consumers and producers, all acting through the medium of the market’ (Lipsey; 1989)
The free-market economy depends upon the interaction of consumers and producers, all acting in their own self interest. The allocation of resources throughout the economy occurs via the ‘price system’ a system which sets the free-market economy aside from the command economy. This system works in conjunction with the theory of demand and supply, that is, price is a function of the demand and supply of goods and services.
An example of this could be illustrated using the markets for beef and pork. Let us say that, due to the recent British Beef crisis, the market demand for beef has ...
... middle of paper ...
...ice of a good, are those for whom the goods and services are produced. In a command economy the central authority decides what, how, and for whom to produce in order to create the best economic situation. In practice, however, there are no purely command or free market economies, all economies are mixed with a tendency towards either extreme. The U.K may be said to be free-market, yet the government intervenes in order to combat the inequitable free-market attitude by monitoring resource allocation through benefits, taxation, subsidies and other policies.
There are arguments or and against both free-market and command economies, however the modern trend of former planned economies moving towards the free-market attitude, despite problems during transition, seems to indicate that perhaps the advantages of the free-market outweigh the disadvantages and that the ‘free-market based’ modern mixed economy is more attractive than command based economies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Beggs, Fischer, Dornbusch (1997) : Economics 5th Edition.
R.G.Lipsey (1989) : An Introduction to Positive Economics.
C.Weststrate (1963) :Types of Economy.
A.Eckstein (1973) : Comparison of Economic Systems.
A considerable viewpoint for answering these questions has been presented by Professor Dwight R. Lee, in his article "Market and Freedom". This article is an attempt of providing some visions to protect the values of free market economy.
Every society should answer three economic questions, which are what to produce? , how to produce? , for whom to produce? The reason why a society should choose what to produce is because a product of one society’s choice is not necessarily the choice of the other choice. A society should decide how to produce goods, it is due to the fact that not all societies have the same resources, some societies may have a lot of people in them so, if they want to produce a good, they can use their human resources to accomplished their task, in the other hand societies with a low populations but a high amount of machines, can use their resources to finish their task. Some countries may be able to provide items that other countries can not, because their economy is better than those countries.
According to Polanyi, a market economy becomes a market society when all land, labour and capital are commodified (Polanyi, 1957). A market society is a structure, which primarily focuses on the production and distribution of commodities and services. This takes place through a free market system, which allows the opportunity for individuals to engage themselves in the market place, through trucking, bartering or exchanging. Polanyi’s fundamental idea of a market society is that all social relations are rooted in the economy as opposed to the economy being submerged in social relations.
Economic liberty is an ideal initiated in the late eighteenth century by philosopher Adam Smith (p.40). This domain of liberty pertains to the freedom of the marketplace. It was Smith who stated in The Wealth of Nations that “the consumer is king”, urging also “that government, interfering in the market by granting mercantilist monopolies, abetted this injustice” (p.
While comparing these two economies, command and market along with capitalism and Socialism, I have learned to differentiate between the two. The command economies tend to lower overall freedom but focus on giving the basic needs of the people. While the market economies focus on the best way to create goods and services and give the people more freedom. These are the two most common economies in the world and it is surprising that both are able to work so well. There are instances where some people are irritated by some regulations put into their economies, but they manage to keep going on and not lose total order.
The main objective of this essay is to understand how market society emerged, but first the defintion and characteristics of a market society must be understood. According to Polanyi, “Market economy implies a self-regulating system of markets.... it is an economy directed by market prices and nothing but market prices”(Polanyi 43). Similarily, Heilbroner explains how the market “allows society to ensure its own provisioning”(Heilbroner 12). Both of these explanations describe how the market economy is self regulated, meaning that this “economic system is controlled, regulated and directed by markets alone...
The major difference between a command economy and a market economy is who makes the decisions. In a command economy, the government decides what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. In a market economy, the people get to decide what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. The major difference lies with the control and who is in charge.
The market economy is believed to be the most successful economic system created because of its success in most of the powerful countries in the world. According to economists, private firms and individuals own the factors of production in this economic system. In accordance to this it is perceived that firms and individuals are the ones that make the decisions on the 3 main economic questions: What to produce, How to produce and for whom to produce. Which is true based on how much influence firms and individuals have on an economy. Firms work hand in hand with individuals/households to keep a country’s economy running efficiently and equitably. Most businesses and business owners who are in this economic system are profit seekers, when looking at America you see that the most powerful participants in the economy have billions. Coming back to the 3 main economic question, economists have had us believe that the:
Countries such as the Soviet Union, North Korea, and Cuba possess command economies (“Examples of Command Economies”). Command economies feature no competition because the government controls and regulates all business ("Command Economy”). Furthermore, command economies focus on maximizing “social welfare” ("Command Economy”). Another key feature of a command economy is the “central plan” which “sets the priorities for the production of all goods and services” (Amadeo).
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.
An economic system must solve the main ‘economic problem’ of a scarcity of resources matching unlimited wants and how to allocate these resources. Within different political and economic systems there are many different theories of how best solve the economic problem. For example; In free market economies;
In a market economy system, decisions about what to produce, how to produce and for who to produce are made by companies and consumers privately. Companies produce those goods and services that are profitable and for which there is demand, while consumers can choose what they buy within their means. State intervention is minimal a...
This view implies that governments intervene for many reasons, including the redistributional and stablisation functions. While market failure is one reason for intervention, other considerations, including questions of equity and social justice determined the nature and the extent of government intervention. This point was expanded upon by Groenewegen (1990,2) who argued that the extent of market intervention in the supply, distribution and redistibution of goods and services are not dictated by purly political and ideological considerations, other considerations may play a role including the failure of the market in certain instances to ensure efficient, equiable allocation of resources.
Economic systems are organized way in which a state or nation allocates its resources and apportions goods and services in the national community. An economic system is slackly defined as country’s plan for its services, goods produced, and the exact way in which its economic plan is carried out. There are three types of economic systems exist, they are command economy, market economy, and mixed economy. Command economy is also sometimes called planned economy. The expectations of this type of economy is that all major decisions that related to the construction or production, distribution, commodity and service prices are all made by the government. However, in market economy, national and state governments play a slight role. The assumption of the market plays a major role in deciding the right path for a country’s economic development. Mixed economy combines elements of both the command and market economies in one interrelated system. Certain features from both market and command economic systems are taken to form this type of economy.
Introduction In this essay I am going to analyse the workings and effectiveness of the price mechanism as a means of allocating and reallocating scarce resources. I am going to do this by comparing the free market economy with its alternatives and by looking at how government intervention allows the price mechanism to carry on working. I am also going to look at the role that we, as consumers, play in the workings of the price mechanism.