Compare And Contrast Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers

403 Words1 Page
Both written by the same author Susan Glaspell, Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers is the same story told through methods. By itself, some minimal differences are between them. The creator of both Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers emphasized the deception of men’s predominance over females in both pieces. Although Susan Glaspell's play Trifles" utilizes on-screen characters to vocalize the numerous feelings of the narrative of the investigation of Minnie Wright, her short story "A Jury of Her Peers" makes the feelings clear without making a sound.
In "A Jury of Her Peers" and "Trifles", the characters' feelings are expressed in the exchange as well as communicated through their movements. The portrayal in "A Jury of Her Peers" makes these feelings more striking by misrepresenting the characters' activities which puts more stress on the sentiments that motivated the action. In “Trifles”, the line “We don’t know who killed him. We don’t know.” is conveyed by Mrs. Peters “By intensifying expression”. In the short story, the author has Mrs. Peters murmur the similar narrative madly like she was hysterical to accept as truth Minnie is innocent. Both extracts use the same arguments, but the piece from the short story has a more grounded enthusiastic effect basically in light of the misrepresented delivery of Mrs.
…show more content…
The play is brilliantly amusing; men just latently overlooked the things that they see as wastes of time, and what could have been utilized against Mrs. Wright. The ladies in the drama outfoxed the men by simply concealing these evidences. What's more, the play essentially spun around these irrelevant things that additionally judge Minnie Foster. A jury of Her Peers, then again, uncovers two noteworthy topics from the entire downgrade of ladies; the women's activist group ("her Peers") who for all intents and purposes decided Mrs. Wright's future and legalism
Open Document