Compare And Contrast The Victorian Era Of The 1920s

1370 Words3 Pages

The 1920’s brought many cultural changes that drastically contrasted with those of the 19th century. The Victorian era of the 19th century was a time of character, frugality, and religion. Ideas of the 20th century created a society of modern values. The “Roaring Twenties” was a time of luxury, consumerism and prosperity . New industries from the world war, and the invention of the moving assembly line raised the economy. Businesses flourished on the concept of pleasing the consumer’s needs and desires. Advertisers like Bruce Barton were “consumption engineers”; they gave moral advice while advertising their product to the consumer by portraying themselves as a friend helping out another friend . As America became a power house of production, …show more content…

Louis Banks joined the army after being a hobo for quite some time. He distinguished the feeling of shame when he left his family for work because “a man had to be on the road” . Banks was thrilled to join the army so that he knew where his money was coming, he would had food and clothes on his back. The hoboes created quite a system of living with codes to illustrate what houses offered food or money to them. Kitty Mulloch, a house wife, fed hoboes off her back porch during the Depression . Her daughter, Kitty, remembered the symbols on their house and that her mom “was hospitable to people, it didn’t matter who they were” . While many jobless found outlets to survive, others failed to do so. The business industry was directly hit by the stock market crash of 1929. Business man, Sidney J. Weinburg, saw the panic take over several of men in his industry on Wall Street. The panic of the stock crash caused people to break down “physically, as well as financially” . Business men jumped out of windows, and those who threatened to were sent to mental hospitals. The early years of the depression had a drastic effect on American life and the citizens in it. Not until the government decided to figure something out to handle the Great Depression will the jobless find …show more content…

Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke in his presidential campaign promising the citizens of America a “New Deal” . This New Deal brought new ways to handle the Great Depression. The country was desperate for a new leader, and Roosevelt won them over. The New Deal created organizations to provide relief to the people in need. Programs like the Public Works Administration, Civil Works Administration, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act helped to provide jobs for those that were left jobless during the early years of the depression. As helpful as these organizations were they also created controversy. People who were aided by these institutions, like Jane Yoder’s father, were seen by the wealthier people as “lazy people, the shovel leaners” . Those who had kept their jobs through the depression degraded the people who received the government’s aid for work. Among the wealthy people who kept their jobs was Martin DeVries. A man upset because he was paying taxes while “everybody else was asking for relief, for our money to help them out” . DeVries was afraid that more people in the American society didn’t feel the need to work, that the government would take care of them. The controversy over whether those seeking opportunities through the government aid weren’t lazy jobless people haltered the progress of many programs. Diana Morgan saw this for herself through working for the office of a program. The rich southern

Open Document