During the periods of the Pax Sinica and the Pax Romana, the Han Chinese and the Roman Empire were alike in politics (both had a bureaucratic government), but differed in religion (Confucianism vs. polytheistic practices) and engineering (while both developed highly groundbreaking technology such as paper and running water, Han China made advances in practicalities, while Rome made advances in sophisticated daily living.) During the period of the Pax Sinica, the Han Chinese continued the political practice of bureaucracy, which was instated by the Qin Chinese in about 250 BCE. A bureaucracy was a form of government in which the dynasty, in this case, places political power in hired state officials. The Han improved upon this system by allowing more freedoms to the population, which was brutally oppressed during the Qin dynasty. They also expanded the empire from Korea to middle Asia, which allowed more direct …show more content…
He did this because he wanted to avenge his adopted dad’s murder by the hands of the Senate. However, when Rome conquered places, they allowed these regions to continue living as they had before, if they pledged allegiance to the Roman Empire, and followed Roman law codes. To be sure that these rules were followed, Rome hired state officials to manage each region, and maintained the presence of Roman soldiers. Both Han China and the Roman Empire maintained a bureaucratic system of government, and, although they had serious differences, such as the amount of bureaucrats and the amount of expansion within the civilization during the time of peace, both civilizations maintained some regional diversity (as long as allegiance was pledged to the ruling empire) and maintained fair law, which the state officials enforced and were also subject
Han China and Rome, despite having some political and cultural differences, fell in ways that were almost directly parallel to one another. Both civilizations experienced declines in everything from culture and population to economy and government, as well as both suffering from attacks by nomadic invaders. However, each civilization's fall had their own unique factors, and the lasting impact of their falls differed greatly.
The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire existed around the same time period and both lasted around 400 years. They each had large populations (around 50 million), conquered enemies they felt as a threat, wanted to spread their boundaries and had strong militaries. The Han Dynasty, located in China, was built on other dynasties such as the Qin and Zhou. The Great Wall of China was built during
One of the differences would be when how the religion split the political people. In the Aztec society, they believed in mainly three god cycles: Fertility, creation, and war and sacrifices. This was their main religion and there were not any other types of religion that ever appeared in the Aztec there for the people are united and obedient to the king because they have the same religion. While in China, the political power is divided because there were three different types of religion. Even if the main one was confucianism there were still little parts of Buddhism and Daoism in China that cause division in unity of the people and the obedience to the emperor. This was their difference because Aztec had only one religion so there was no differences among the citizens but because China had three different types of religion it made it harder for unity among the citizens.
Despite the social hierarchy and acceptance of position of the population in both societies, Han China and Classical Athens had disparities proportionate to their physical sizes. The geographical isolation from each other resulted in the differences in demographics, characteristics of government structures, individual duties and roles in government, and the general view of life.
After the assassination of Caesar, his nephew and adopted Son took it upon himself to bring to justice those who had murdered his great-uncle. In the quotation above, we see that the young Augustus , who did not yet have his own military command, had to raise his own army and fund them himself. Though the
The Qin and Zhou Dynasties were very much alike In their economy and geography but there style of government is what set them apart. Geographically the Qin and Zhou dynasties were both located in the Northeast part of China. They both were very successful in agriculture because of the fertile soil from the Yellow River. However the
be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than
Some similarities between the Zhou and Han dynasties include the family and religious systems and some of the changes include government authority and increasing trade and philosophy.
The Han dynasty and the Roman Empire were both powerful empires during their era. However, the ways they obtained their power varied greatly because they used different methods that involved their political structures, which revolved around their centralized governments. The Han dynasty and the Roman Empire acquired very unique techniques that allowed them to control social and political. For example, the Han dynasty adopted a religion known as Confucianism, which monitored everything in the lives of the Chinese. Contrary, the Roman Empire established a monarchy but allowed its residents more freedom as compared to the Han. Nevertheless, the two empires were similar in political structures in that the power was depended on the wealthy that were in authority, the peasants struggled with their lives because of concerning issues such as food supply. The empires were able to create and preserve a peaceful and sustainable lives for a long time, unlike the past empires. Social distribution were under the control of the wealthiest and they could effortlessly impact community viewpoints and interactions among the residents. These two empires existed during the Classical Period had comparable and various social, political, religions, as well as economical values and practices. However, they both possessed differences and similarities in their economic and social perspectives even though the two empires were established around the same era.
While Imperial Rome and Han China are homogenous in various measures in government, religion and their social structure, they are also contrasting with them as well.
The Han Dynasty was established in 221 BCE by the rebel leader of the peasants, Liu Bang. Religion not only played a role in the Han dynasty’s rise, but also in their fall through conversion. On the other side of the spectrum, the Roman Empire between 33 and 300, were also undergoing change through religious beliefs. Similarly, both the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire were built by a spread of religious beliefs. In my opinion, religion is the most significant difference between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty China based on its effects on the political rule and nature of political authority during both eras. Religion is the most significant difference because societal practices and power structure of the two eras stem from the different beliefs. The Han Dynasty is built up from the spread of Confucianism. The Roman Empire is built up from the spread of Christianity. The two religion’s
The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty had many differences and similarities. Both had different origins, government, religions, economy, society, and history. However, the two empires were similar in the empire's vastness, their economic and military strength, the emperor's power, and their decline. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty were some of the greatest empires in Asia, as well as in the world.
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two grand empires that rose out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over wide areas. The collapse of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came after a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the political disorder that stemmed from the early dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the other hand, the rise of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and overriding the democratic elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of “citizen” as subjects to the Roman emperor. Both empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political dominance; however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and imperial expansionist natures diverged.
Han China and Ancient shared bureaucratic governments. This means that they had a government ruled by unelected officials, giving the people little to no say in government. In Rome the ruler was once a king but then their government transitioned to an oligarchy, which would put the rich people in the highest place in society. On the other hand in Han China, which was an imperial dynasty, and emperors were decided by the Mandate of Heaven. The Mandate gave the common man a chance to become a major ruler during the Han period. The Han government was mainly influenced by confucian government while Romes was based on Roman law and the classics. The Han government spread Confucianism since that was the basis for their government. Rome also relied on local rulers to make sure that their many lands were following rules and not plotting against them. Both the Han and Rome shared a bureaucratic government which affected their social structures in different ways.
The political system of both Roman empires was based on virtue and the republic was founded with the Senate as the center. The magistrates were elected annually and also had control of the armies. The key to Roman superiority was the patriotism and training and drills.