Compare And Contrast Mccandless And Treks

1298 Words3 Pages

Two different journeys done by two different men. One inspired by the other. Their names are Chris McCandless and Henry Thoreau. Henry inspired Chris to go on his own journey after Chris read the book “Walden” that Henry wrote. They both wanted to go to Alaska but had two totally different reasons for why they were subtracting themselves from society. McCandless’s and Thoreau’s treks were different because McCandless was social but Thoreau wasn’t, McCandless and Thoreau had different conditions in their life that made them want to go live in the woods, and McCandless liked to travel while Thoreau liked to live in only one place.
One way McCandless and Thoreau were different during their treks was that McCandless was a lot more social than …show more content…

McCandless would always argue or fight with his parents. He was embarrassed by the amount of money his family had. For example, after he graduated from high school his parents offered to buy him a new car since his was a bit old and out of shape but he strongly declined. In the book “Into the Wild” it states, “Chris had only recently upbraided Walt and Billie for expressing their desire to buy him a new car as a graduation present,”(Krakauer 20). His parents would always tell him what to do or try to make some of the most important life decisions for him. Finally, when Chris graduated from college, he went out on his journey to the wilderness of Alaska to get away from his parents and live his own life …show more content…

McCandless always loved to travel from the start. In high school he would always want to go places and experience new things but his parents wouldn’t let him. Once he graduated from high school he stayed with his family for a little bit but then set off on his adventure not long after. He wanted to get away so bad and start a new life. During his journey to Alaska he traveled everywhere and stayed in strange places. Some of the places he traveled to were cities in Virginia, Texas, Arizona, California, Oregon, Washington, South Dakota, Mexico, Nevada and Colorado. At the end of his long journey, he made it to the wilderness of Alaska where he ended his life as well

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Chris McCandless, Jon Krakauer and Everett Ruess

    1082 Words  | 3 Pages

    All three adventurers displayed their affection for the wilderness through how they lived after leaving society. After reaching Fairbanks, Alaska, McCandless set up his camp and began to live off the wildlife nearby. In his journal, he noted what he caught each day and showed his gratefulness through his writing font. He believed that “it [wildlife] was morally indefensible to waste any part of an animal that has been shot for food” (166). He tried his best to preserve the animals he shot for food, which in turn displayed his thoughts of nature as something precious.

    Read More

  • Book Analysis: Chris Mccandless

    1372 Words  | 3 Pages

    "I think that Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant at the same time. He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness. He made a lot of mistakes based on ignorance. I don’t admire him at all for his courage nor his noble ideas. Really, I think he was just plain crazy”- Shaun Callarman. Feeling invincible is new for young adults, but Chris McCandless convinced himself that he knew he was immortal rather than just believing it. His adventure into the wild was mostly due to his rebellious spirit. Some would argue that his vacation wasn 't inspired by his irrational aspirations, but instead by his family. Some say that he skipped town to get away from the strict prison that he called

    Read More

  • The Success of Chris McCandless

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer portrays Christopher McCandless as an infallibly eager young man hoping to distance himself from the society he so obviously loathes, to "live off the land," entirely independent of a world which has "conditioned [itself] to a life of security." Chris, contrarily to this depiction, is disparagingly viewed by some as a "reckless idiot" who lacked the sense he needed to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This derogatory assessment of Chris's mindset is representative of the society he hopes to escape and contains all the ignorance that causes him to feel this way. Nevertheless, he is misjudged by these critics, allowing Krakauer to hold the more accurate interpretation of Chris's character, his goals, and his accomplishments.

    Read More

  • Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

    1626 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.

    Read More

  • Into the Wild: The Tragedy and Triumph of Chris Mccandless

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... the milky crisp mountains of Alaska, it was everything he imagined it to be. However his burgeoning haplessness ended in the tragedy of his death. Though he abated in a world of reverie, he found enough energy to say his impeccable goodbyes to his loved ones and family. McCandless like a judge in the Supreme Court of the United States was justified in the absence of attending his life with his family and was not a fool for doing so. Though his incredible journey ended in demise, it was a feat for him and all of those who loved him. To quote Henry David Thoreau , “I learned this, at least, by my experiment: that if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours.”

    Read More

  • Henry Thoreau vs. Chris McCandless

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Thoreau and McCandless had a deep appreciation for solitude in nature. In Walden, Thoreau explains how he’d “... love to see Nature that is so rife with life that myriads can be afforded to be sacrificed and suffered to prey on one another; that tender organizations can be so serenely squashed out of existence..” (Thoreau, Walden 238). While being on his “adventure”, Thoreau was able to observe all of the little things in nature, and appreciate all of the little things. While in civilization, one would not be able to notice such things because there are much too many people around to notice. While on his journey, McCandless “No longer.

    Read More

  • Christopher McCandless' Misunderstanding of Transcendentalism

    786 Words  | 2 Pages

    McCandless used the idea of escaping society from “Walden” by Henry David Thoreau and tried to mesh it together with the ideas of solitude and isolation to form his own beliefs. McCandless misinterpreted what Thoreau was saying. Thoreau states, “I had not lived there a week…It is true, I fear, that others may have fallen into it, and so helped to keep it open.” (Thoreau 3).Thoreau specifically states in this quote that he does not want others to follow or even go do what he did. He also did build the cabin a few miles away from a town because he knew he would go back one day. Thoreau was a sane person in doing this because crazy people stray too far away from society despite the consequences. He believed that he had other things to do with his life and not spending a minute more in that lifestyle. McCandless still went out into the wilderness away from society against Thoreau’s words. Chris was crazy to shun s...

    Read More

  • Henry David Thoreau’s Walden, Jon Krakauer’s Into The Wild, and Werner Herzog’s Grizzly Man

    2045 Words  | 5 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau’s Walden, Jon Krakauer’s Into The Wild, and Werner Herzog’s Grizzly Man all tell the stories of a real-life character that makes the decision to venture out into the wilderness on his own. On one hand, Chris McCandless (Into The Wild), Timothy Treadwell (Grizzly Man), and Thoreau are similar in several ways. All three men record some kind of documentation about their journey; McCandless and Thoreau keep journals while Treadwell keeps a video log. Also, all three forced themselves to really live off the land using only the bare minimum of essentials. On the other hand, the men had several differences. In two of the stories, Into The Wild and Grizzly Man, the main character perishes as a result of his choice to live this way, while in Walden, Thoreau survives all the way through his experience. However, the most prominent differences between the characters were their reasons for venturing into the wild in the first place. Henry David Thoreau went into the woods “because [he] wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if [he] could learn what it had to teach, and not, when [he] came to die, discover that [he] had not lived” (Thoreau, Chapter II). His goal was to live his life simply yet richly in the wilderness. Chris McCandless went into the woods for a similar yet different reason. McCandless was opposed to living life the traditional way. He went into the wild to escape society and the traditional way of life. He wanted to prove to himself that he could survive out in the wild away from everything and everyone else. Finally, Timothy Treadwell makes his journey into the Alaskan wild for what he says is the protection of the bear population. His goal is to protect the bears fr...

    Read More

  • into the wild 1st essay

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Chris McCandless was born in El Segundo, California in February 12, 1968 he was the older brother of Carine. His father was employed as an antenna specialist at National Aeroutics and Space Administration. His mother worked as a secretary at Hughes Aircraft. Then the family decided to move to Fairfax, Virginia, where Chris live. Chris parents would often fight and sometimes considered getting divorced. Chris and Carine have six half siblings living in California from his father’s first marriage. Chris’s father had an affair with Chris’s mom while he was married , because of that caused him to hold bitterness toward his father, maybe he was so ashamed of him he just wanted to get ...

    Read More

  • Jon Krakauer’s Use of Rhetorical Devices in Into the Wild

    1133 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.

    Read More

  • Individualism In Into The Wild

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    Chris McCandless and Henry David Thoreau both live to embrace the religious, philosophical, and literacy movements of being transcendentalists. Transcendentalism arose in the 19th century and let many people embrace their self-wisdom, individualism, and nature. In the book Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, and Thoreau’s excerpts from Walden, it is very clear that Chris’s beliefs and Thoreau’s beliefs have a lot in common. The connections show through both Chris’s and Thoreau’s self-wisdom, individualism, and nature.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Chris Mccandless In Into The Wild By Jon Krakauer

    913 Words  | 2 Pages

    He left and “walked into the wild”, as he said, to escape his problems (Krakauer, 69). He never confronted his dad about his feelings. Carine McCandless talks about this personality trait in Chris saying, “Chris was the sort of person who brooded on things. If something bothered him; he wouldn’t come right out and say it” (Krakauer, 122). He changed his name, He wasn’t trying to take pride in his “adventure”. It was an extra and unnecessary precaution to ensure that his problems would not affect his escape. Chris McCandless changed his name and then continued his life ignoring all of the problems he had ever

    Read More

  • Christopher McCandless: An Admirable Man

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    To start with, McCandless was not someone who gave up. Despite others trying to scare him out of continuing with his journey into the Alaskan wilderness, nothing deterred McCandless. He anxiously awaited to experience life off the land. The people McCandless encountered on his way to Alaska often commented on his determination. Jim Gallien, a man who drove McCandless into the Alaska interior, described McCandless as “real gung-ho”. McCandless's attempt to undertake such a risky endeavour is something to admire in itself. To travel two years, mostly on foot, is certainly not an easy task. However, McCandless still persevered through the hardships he faced throughout his journey. McCandles...

    Read More

  • Walden Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    638 Words  | 2 Pages

    In an odd twist, he even challenges the fact that is isolated with the quote “What sort of space is that which separates a man from his fellows and makes him solitary?” By challenging the distance required to call someone “solitary,” Thoreau argues that he is not all on his own but is instead slightly distanced from the rest of the world. He states that physical proximity does not equate to mental proximity. “ No exertion of the legs can bring two minds much nearer to one another” is how he states it, and so he believed that his books and papers were just as effective as face-to-face communication in spreading his message. Though that idea may be debatable, by refuting the space between his cabin on Walden Pond and the rest of society Thoreau puts himself closer to the audience than they may have previously thought he

    Read More

  • Chris McCandless: A True Hero

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    Chris McCandless is regarded as being something as a spiritual figure almost as a cult hero, some call him a disillusioned fool, some call him a great adventurer, and the debate still continues. As Matthew Power calls in his article, an article where he tells the story of McCandless,“The debate falls into two camps: Krakauer's visionary seeker, the tragic hero who dared to live the unmediated life he had dreamed of and died trying; or, as many Alaskans see it, the unprepared fool, a greenhorn who had fundamentally misjudged the wilderness he'd wanted so desperately to commune with.” Like so many stories covering Christopher McCandless’ death, both ends of the argument are discussed in an unfavored manner in the hopes to help develop an opinion on the McCandless story. This open ended question can only be answered open-endedly based on what the readers base for themselves as covered stories intend. Like Power has done, ...

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Mccandless And Treks

Open Document