Compare And Contrast European And Japanese Feudalism

Summation
One way through which both the Japanese and Europeans’ feudal systems were built was via consistent hereditary practices among the ruling classes. This was in the sense that power was continuously retained among the persons at the top positions of office. The alignment of authority was such that the noble family was at the top position, and the warriors were situated at the second position of command in these systems of rule among both the Europeans and Japanese. The persons who fell at the bottom position were referred to as the serfs or the tenant farmers owing to the fact that these individuals were considered to have very little power and authority within their distinctive areas of residence . There was hardly any progress made

Confucius in his philosophical proclamations emphasized on the need for individuals to uphold morality in their societies always . On the same note, if individuals were to live in peaceful coexistence with one another in their societies then they had to ascertain to the reality that they respected the elderly persons within their surroundings and most importantly the leaders who ensured that individuals lived in societies that were orderly and self-fulfilling. Subsequently, the leaders of Japan and the samurai warriors ensured that they reached their moral obligations within their society . This was apparent in the manner that these individuals worked to make certain that the peasants and villagers in their localities were routinely protected from any harm that might come their way. As a show of gratitude, the villagers and peasants themselves had to reciprocate the contributions of their leaders and the warriors in their societies by respecting their leaders and warriors. To add onto this, the protected persons had to elicit their gratitude by ensuring that they paid their taxes in due time and in the right proportions to facilitate the ease with which their leaders ascertained to smooth operations in their areas of