Compare And Contrast Apple And Apple Supply Chain

1660 Words4 Pages

Apple Supply Chain Apple Inc. is one of the world’s most successful companies when it comes to supply chain management. In its early years the company struggled forecasting demand and managing inventory causing many issues in supply chain including stock-outs. As years went on Apple began investing heavily in their supply chain, controlling many aspects such as overseas production, assembly and logistics. While Apple still faces some challenges including things such as technology, competition, global market share, and leadership, it is still ranked as a master company in supply chain according to Gartner Inc, making a great company to invest in.
Key Competitive Advantages
When Steve jobs returned to Apple in 1996 he found a struggling company. …show more content…

puts Apple’s supply chain in the “masters category.” an achievement awarded only to the companies that scored in the top 5 supply chain rankings for at least 7 out of the last 10 years, and currently only populated by Apple and Procter & Gamble. Walmart’s supply chain is #16 on the list. Both Walmart and Apple are considered innovators and pioneers in the field of supply chain management.
Like Walmart, Apple uses its purchasing power to control suppliers and their costs. Both businesses invest in new supply chain management technologies and are always looking to improve their current processes. The efficiency of both supply chains leads to time and cost savings. Both organizations deal directly with manufacturers, leading to more regular inventory flow and is a major advantage in their supply chains. They focus on forecasting the demand in order to determine inventory needs. Collaboration and cooperation are key in both supply chains, with the creation of partnerships that secure high volume delivery at lower costs. Both Walmart and Apple keep very close and open communications with their suppliers – while Walmart is basically the creator of direct computer management, Apple sends representatives to work with their suppliers in person until they achieve the necessary efficiencies. Both companies basically reach out to their suppliers as if they were part of the same firm. Both businesses avoid the use of third-parties, …show more content…

They currently use an “omnistyle” strategy, which makes the inventory in stores and distribution centers available to customers to keep up with the eCommerce demands. Walmart’s omnistyle strategy is similar to what Apple is doing when they are enlisting their vendors to ship product directly to customers. This method cuts out a middle-man, potentially saves shipping costs, and gets the product to the customer quicker.
In comparison with Apple, Walmart uses a very expansive network of vendors to source all their types of different items. Apple’s key components are typically sourced from a single manufacturer and used across their whole product line. Apple’s devices are available only in a limited number of configurations, allowing the component sourcing to be managed and streamlined. Walmart’s vendor network supplies thousands of different products, making the supply chain larger and vendors more diverse. Walmart’s main controls are placed around cost, and while Apple is also cognizant of cost, they also have the capital to pay to ensure they receive high quality cost and

Open Document