Comparative Essay On The Relationship Between Frankenstein And The Tempest

2366 Words5 Pages

Most people know the concept of human nature in its simplest form, a way in which humans interact with the world around them, but perhaps a more fascinating and often overlooked component of this anomaly (what word should I actually use here?) is the way that human nature applies to the way that people treat each other. Shakespeare and Shelly both observed the way in which instinct affected the way people treat each other and incorporated it into The Tempest and Frankenstein respectively. They focused on two major aspects of human nature, the way people act when in a position of power and the way people act when face with outsiders. Shakespeare did this by showing Caliban as a victim of human nature in both of these situations. Shelly made …show more content…

In this case Prospero the rightful Duke of Milan has power over the seemingly uncivilized Caliban whom he seized the island from years ago. Prospero, in the position of power, commits three major atrocities against Caliban in The Tempest the first is taking the island from Caliban, the second is a direct result of the first and it is Prospero’s enslavement of Caliban, and the third is verbal abuse (end, and act 1 scene 2). The first interaction between Prospero and Caliban illustrates Prospero’s apprehension of the island from Caliban which he explains in the first act, “I must eat my dinner./This island’s mine by Sycorax my mother,/Which thou tak’st from me.” (Shakespeare, 1.2.331–333). In this quotation Caliban explains his rightful claim to the island that was given to him by his mother, and the way that Prospero took it from him. The second way Prospero used his power to abuse Caliban was by enslaving him after conquering the island. He did this by using his extensive knowledge and education as a form of power to trick Caliban into becoming a loyal slave. He first treated Caliban as a friend to gain loyalty. Caliban recounts this time in the first act, “When thou cam’st first/Thou strok’st me and made much of me; wouldst give me/Water with berries in’t, and teach me how/To name the bigger light, and how the less,/ That burn by day …show more content…

The two authors show this through situations where people are placed in similar situations and react in similar ways. Primarily when put in a situation of power, people are expected to mistreat those without power, as evident in The Tempest when studying Prospero and Caliban’s relationship and in Frankenstein when examining Victor and the monster’s relationship. Secondly when faced with people who act and especially look different, human nature is for people to act with hostility and intolerance which is shown in the Tempest by the way the Europeans treat the odd looking native islander, and is also shown in Frankenstein by the general populations reaction to Frankenstein’s monster. Human nature is a timeless concept that will always exist, and was extremely influential in the plot of both The Tempest and Frankenstein which only confirms that these books will be classics

Open Document