Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important of society in justice
Important of society in justice
Role of justice in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Important of society in justice
“The only way to identify the requirements of justice is to see how each particular community understands the value of social goods”(Kymlicka 211). This is the approach to justice from the communitarian. Communitarianism in the last few decades has sparked in popularity among political philosophers. Communitarians believe that political theories, such as classic liberalism, leaves out the importance and significance of the community. The communitarian respects and upholds social practices and traditions as a way of governing, and as a way of justice. Because of the importance of the cultural aspect, this political current is thought of as a cultural relativist approach to justice. The communitarian does not accept the notion of being able to detach the self from roles of society. While communitarianism shows a great respect for cultural practices and tradition, it is an incomplete theory on the notion of being able to protect individual citizens from social institutions, like the community itself. For the communitarian, the liberal approach is inadequate because of its insistence on a universal and ahistorical approach to justice. According to Waltzer, there is no way to step outside history or culture(211). People, as much as they would like to believe otherwise, are bound, and somewhat controlled by society's norms and behaviours. For the communitarian, there is no way to detach people from the social realm because it is apart of who we are as humans. We are shaped by the events of history, and shown how to behave within our culture. There is no way to externalize ourselves from the community because of how embedded it is in our psyche(221). With this notion, if a community can have a shared understanding of what the common go... ... middle of paper ... ...aditions of certain cultural practices, but not to the extent of making it a political theory. In todays world, we need a solid foundation to each individual in order to have a working, non-oppressive, self-respecting society. The liberal approach respects the ideals of certain cultures, but not to the extent of the communitarian. Overall, the liberal theory of justice is a more relevant political theory in our globalized world. Works Cited Kymlicka, Will. "Communitarianism." Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. 208-83. Print. Mackrael, Kim. "Ottawa's Elimination of CIDA Brand Signals End of a Foreign-aid Era." The Globe and Mail. N.p., 27 June 2013. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. .
What is a civic stance? Broken down into two separate words civic and stance, the word civic, according to Webster means, of or relating to a city, citizenship or civil affairs. The word stance means a way of standing. So, more or less it means the way you stand on civil affairs. The next question is what kinds of civic stances are there?
Imagine that rational actor X has been charged with the responsibility of developing the guiding principles for a totaly new type of social contract for today’s society. Is there a way for actor X to perform this task in a truly equitable manner? Consider that “with respect to any complex mater of deep human importance there is n o ‘innocent eye’ —no way of seeing the world that is entirely neutral and free of cultural shaping.” 1 As an entrenched member of a particular culture the complete removal of personal biases and prejudices from within the human psyche is not possible; nonetheless, it would of course be necessary to take steps to at least minimize their effects. In his 1971 book, A Theory of Justice , John Rawls suggests that exactly this type of reduction is possible by figuratively stepping behind a ‘veil of ignorance’ int o what he labels the ‘original position’ —this paper is an introduction to the contractarian thinking of John Rawls and its relation to the original position as expressed in his 1971 book, A Theory of Justice.
Society is built and run on social and moral obligations and while these two are closely related, both impact cultures around the world in different ways. Marx’s Communist Manifesto and Mill’s On Liberty demonstrate the relationship these obligations have with successful and unsuccessful social constructs. For the purposes of this paper, a moral obligation is a consideration of what is right¬¬¬ and wrong and can vary depending on pressures from external sources such as religion, while a social obligation is a responsibility the individual has to act to benefit the best interests of their class as well as supporting the stability between society and the individual. Marx and Mill differ greatly in their opinions on the role and effects of both moral and social obligation, with Marx claiming that social obligation is one’s responsibility to one’s class and Mill claiming that it is one’s responsibility to further the society by expressing one’s own ideas because doing so is key to preventing society from becoming stagnant. Both authors also have differing views on moral obligation since Marx also claims that morality as a whole is a social construction used to oppress the Proletariat and that it is therefore invalid, whereas Mill claims that moral obligation is one’s debt to oneself to express their opinion, since not doing so would leave one’s character undeveloped.
Political ideas change and adapt their perceptions of the social and political world through the years to cope with all changing aspects of life. Liberalism is no different. It is these changes that allow the idea to maintain its identity. Sometimes it is hard for some political ideas to adapt and change for instance the divine monarchists. Liberalism goes back at least 300years; this means that it has had to change a great deal, the ideas behind the ideology have remained the same though. Liberalism started attacking the monarchy in Britain but soon moved on to social change. This relates back to the heart of liberalism, the concept of the individual. This can be difficult because ‘man is born free, but everywhere in chains’ (- Jean-Jaques Rousseau). Liberalism was a political idea adopted by many countries during the 19th and 20th century and has been the source of many economic and social policies. Liberalism believes that each person should be free to act as they wish, it also believes that each individual deserves respect no matter of race, religion, sexual preference, or social status. Most liberals believe that the government is detrimental to liberalism’s beliefs because it does not allow everyone to be an individual since laws are in place to limit freedom. John Locke advocated this when he attacked the government saying ‘no government allows absolute liberty”. This is true because if no laws were in place then absolute liberty would soon be replaced by anarchy. Liberalism not only influenced equality but it was the basic idea behind the United States of America constitution. This was easy for the American governments to adopt because unlike other countries, it did not have to contend with aristocratic traditions and institutions.
middle of paper ... ... This comment suggests that the current idea, liberalism, may just be a phase in human ideology that has spread worldwide. Though he made a compelling argument and posed thought provoking questions that supported his argument, the flaws in his argument, after stringent analysis, contradict his main points. Works Cited Ferguson, C. (Director).
But these are not the only two obligations, as according to Sandel, there are obligations of solidarity, where obligations are particular to those that share a history with us and does not need consent as we our lives are somehow tied to them. However, some may argue that obligations of solidarity are actions of collective selfishness. Nevertheless, Sandel counters by stating that these obligations can be for people we know or those who may have had a burdensome history, such that public apologies are examples of this, by spreading the responsibility to other communities. Sandel then argues against the philosophy of neutrality in the government as he states that this is not possible without moral questions. Then, Sandel talks about justice. Sandel believes in the third approach of justice that involves creating a public culture of various virtues and reasons. He says that justice is judgemental as it is linked to ideas of honor and virtue, pride and recognition. It is about how we distribute justice and how we value the things around it. Sandel concludes the book, with four possible themes “the politics of common good would look like” (Sandel,
According to Lee Anne Bell’s “Theoretical Foundations,” from Reading for Diversity and Social Justice, social justice is described as a society that contributes to one another and has its resources. In addition, people living in the society can feel safe and secure. Although, the idea of social justice is interfered with oppression. Bell describes a few main features that set up the issue with oppression which include pervasive, restrictive, hierarchical, complex, multiple and cross cutting relationships. She describes pervasive as a better transition towards oppression instead of using discrimination, bias, and prejudice. The study can be further investigated with other readings from RDSJ, such as “Taking the Indian Out of the Indian” by Grinde
It should not be for our government to make a collective decision, on our behalf, that one form of thinking is obsolete and should trump all other opinions regarding the matter. This is highly evident in looking at two examples of contrasting points of view from individuals within our society; such as a communitarianism and
Liberalism is a political or social philosophy that advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary system of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutes to assure unrestricted development in all sphere of the human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.
John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.
John Gray argues in “Two Faces of Liberalism” that the idea of liberal toleration is an attempt to reach modus vivendi, which is a peaceful coexistence between groups who hold competing values. He states that liberal toleration has two sides. One that seeks to make liberal toleration a universal value, as the best way to live. The other face is one that believes in liberal toleration as a belief that, “human beings can flourish in many ways of life,” (Gray 1). Furthermore, in this first chapter, he states his belief in value-pluralism, which he goes into more depth on in chapter two, as well as the idea that some values are, “incommensurable,” or that they cannot be judged against each other.
Conservatives have traditionally viewed society as an organic whole or a living entity whose parts work together in the same fashion the brain, heart and lungs do in a human body. If society is organic, its various institutions have been shaped by natural necessity and forces so as to provide security and social cohesion. Any attempts to alter this structure are thus fraught with danger as reform or change may lead to the collapse of society. Conservatives have therefore been suspicious of change and have generally adopted a pragmatic approach believing in cha... ...
Here, we end up with two different visions of society. One, the communitarian, the second is the liberal. The communitarian would view the individual as being part of a...
Liberalism in the sense of a political philosophy was created on the ideas of equality and liberty for everyone. Basically liberalism is concerned with the notion of how individuals in political communities are able to maximize their freedom without violating the rights of other individuals. The liberalistic view on politics is that a legitimate government is necessary to protect the rights of individuals from being harmed by others. Liberalism also ensures that there is a higher authority which protects the freedoms and rights of individuals while also ensuring legitimacy of government. Liberalism is the founding base for much of the Western world’s government policies and constitution. Liberalism ensures tolerance and promotes acceptance between humans and their differences.
The theme of community has always had a central and prominent place in social theory. A number of connected problems are at the heart of social theory. These related problems are often thought of as variations of the key problems of the relationship between ‘the community’ and ‘the individual’. (Browning et al., 2000) Communitarianism is a philosophy that emphasizes the connection between the individual and the community. While the “community “may be a family unit, it is usually understood in the wider sense of interactions between the community of people in a geographical location, or who have a shared history or interest. (Wiki, 2014) Thus, this philosophy, in this period, has been said to be prominent in a number of distinctive and time-specific ways. Community is just the whole range of that sort of group or institution-not the individual, not the family, not the state, not the market, but all the ones in between: churches, neighbourhoods, schools, clubs, kinship networks, associations etc. The concept of community refers to both a particular class of social entities, and to a particular range of social relations. (Browning et al., 2000) Some characteristics of this philosophy includes the fact that it is related to older theories of community such as Marxism, pragmatism, romanticism, ethical socialism, and strands of theology from the Jewish, Christian and other religious traditions. Secondly, a number of government-sponsored social policies have brought the term ‘community’ to a new prominence in political and social discourses- policies such as community care, community policing and community regeneration. These programmes during the 1980s were introduced by right-wing governments who attempted to yoke them together with ...