All romantic relationships experience challenges at one point or another. How a couple addresses these issues determines how they will build and maintain a healthy and satisfying relationship. According to the textbook, there are three common guidelines for communicating in romantic relationships, including engaging in dual perspective, negotiating safe sex and managing conflict constructively (Wood, 2010). These points are best communicated in a face-to-face setting rather than computer mediated communication [CMC]. Keeping this in mind, romantic relationships should be pursued, primarily maintained, and even dissolved in face-to-face communication because CMC produces greater levels of uncertainty, lower levels of intimacy and higher levels …show more content…
Since computer-mediated relationships are propelled by uncertainty-reduction and information-seeking behavior (Pauley, 2007), they are not as focused on dual perspective during interaction. Research shows that partners will not develop in a relationship until uncertainty is reduced (Pauley, 2007). Although mediated communication results in greater levels of uncertainty reduction due to the lack of face-to-face interaction, it is not the most effective way to engage in dual perspective. Mediated sources operate as a simple and rapid way to connect to social networks, which in turn crowd out face-to-face conversations. For example, if conflict arose in a romantic relationship and the couple could only converse through a mediated source, it is likely that the conflict would only be resolved temporarily, if at all. This is because seeing a person face-to-face enables partners to easily recognize and interpret body language, listen more closely to what the other person has to say, engage in dual perspective and a multitude of other factors that come in to play when speaking in person. CMC does not provide a sufficient number of verbal and nonverbal cues for partners to develop, maintain or even dissolve a relationship (Pauley, 2007). Therefore, a relationship that is …show more content…
In many ways, intimacy results in relationship development and growth. Intimacy in a relationship requires communication, thus developing trust, passion and commitment between partners. However, technology changes the way individuals interact online (Pauley, 2007). The lack of verbal and nonverbal cues in CMC hinders intimacy in romantic relationships, and the absence of physical contact “leads to less interpersonal influence and higher levels of private self-awareness than face-to-face communication” (Sassenberg, 2005). For a couple that has primarily developed and maintained their relationship through mediated sources, intimacy may not be as important as other factors in the romance. However, it is a fundamental human urge to engage in sexual activity and the inability to do this will eventually become an issue. Either one, the other, or both partners will seek an outside source for intimacy. Communication is as fault when this happens as partners experience unfaithfulness and untrustworthy qualities. CMC is not an optimal way to communicate sexual feelings, ergo face-to-face development and maintenance is essential to a romantic relationship in regards to intimacy and practicing safe
When thinking about romantic relationships, whether in the movies, media or your own relationship what characteristics come to mind? The topic we will discuss in this presentation attends to the romantic relationships within interpersonal communication.
While all relationships can be difficult, romantic relationships seem to be some of the most complicated types. Sometimes two people can care for one another so much, yet they cannot seem to communicate effectively. When a lack of communication occurs between two people for a long period of time, it most likely will lead to a huge confrontation and possibly a complete dissolve of the relationship. The Break-Up is a movie that shows how important interpersonal communication is in relationships. The movie features Brooke and Gary, a couple which has been together for several years. Although they seem to be arguing about something trivial like lemons, there are much bigger issues that begin to surface. Throughout this paper I will show how
It is not all about communication” . It says that not surprisingly those couples who reported communicating more effectively showed the highest satisfaction with their relationships. But the next two reasons which were also the only other ones with strong links to couple happiness, were knowledge of partner which included everything from knowing their pizza-topping preferences to their hopes and dreams and life skills like being able to hold a job, manage money, etc . But in order to have a healthy relationship I do believe that the communication is key but they also do need to know how to communicate in a healthy way that will not cause
... L., Andersen, P., & Afifi, W. (2011). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. (3 ed., pp. 322-330). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Loveless, M., Powers, W., & Jordan, W. (2008). Dating partner communication apprehension, self disclosure, and the first big fight. Human Communication, 11(1), 231-240.
For many years, there has been a controversy on whether facilitated communication (FC) users are actually the authors of their own thoughts or not. This has also raised issues of independence and intelligence of the FC user. Many people question the autistic person’s competence with FC and tend to assume they are ‘mentally retarded’. However, Sue Rubin (2001) who communicates through typing that has become independent with many years of physical support and Libby Grace (2015) who is an academic who often gives lectures and presentations verbally, but she also thinks about communication through writing prove to people whose assumptions of ‘mental retardation’ are wrong and with practice they can become independent FC users.
This type of infidelity encompasses a romantic or sexual relationship that is done with another individual other than one’s spouse. Not only it starts there, but is also maintained online through the use of various communication and interaction platforms. Online infidelity takes place when an individual who is already engaged in a serious relationship, undertakes an involvement in computer based interactive relationship. There has been a raging debate as to whether the interactions that occur in the chat rooms amount as infidelity. Online infidelity has been categorized as infidelity since it encompasses exclusivity, which is a privilege accorded to the spouse and which is broken through the chat room conversations. The level of secrecy involved in the conversations in these chat rooms never gets to the spouse. Similarly, the authors of our textbook claim “even if the couple does not meet, men and women still tend to think of online relationships as a form of betrayal that is associated with relationship problems.” (Lamanna, Riedmann, & Stewart, 2018, p.
And the heart, even in this commercial age, finds a way”(222)—implying that, although not perfect, online romance can work. He evidences his statement by illustrating how online dating “slows things down” (221), “puts structure back into courtship” (221), and “is at once ruthlessly transactional and strangely tender” (221). For example, he describes how couples might “exchange email for weeks or months” (221) when using a dating site, effectively slowing the dating process and adding more structure to courtship. He displays the transactional and sensitive side of Internet dating when he points to Internet exchanges between couples that “encourage both extreme honesty (the strangers-on-a-train phenomenon) and extreme dishonesty, as people lie about their ages, their jobs, whether they have kids and, most often, whether they are married” (222).
With recent advancements in technology (e-mail, phone, text, social media, and video conference), couples can manage and maintain their relationship with a simple touch of a button. Foremost, communication through technology is important to couples involved in long-distance relationships (LDRs), as the demand for relational development requires constant attention.
Whitty, M. and Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. New York, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
It takes more than words to create a safe, exciting and secure relationship. Too often the signals we send are not those we intend to send. When this happens, both connection and trust are lost in our relationships.
Why was the message that was sent to me in all caps? Is that a way of showing anger? Many get emails or texts or any forms of messages through electronic communication and have no idea what the message is saying or how their tone of voice is. Many have kids who just started using communication or haven’t started at all, and are wondering what to teach their kids about communication. The best solution to this problem is to teach using face to face communication. In the old days, talking face to face was the way to go. They would walk or drive somewhere and meet up just to have a conversation. Now a day we rely on electronics. Even though sending emails is easy, talking face to face helps understand people in a more formal manner. Are these digital connections as meaningful as the old fashioned face-to-face kind?
Furthermore, Internet users who use the internet for their relationship will tend to lose patience to conduct social relations in the real world. People who commu...
... comfort or understanding from their primary relationships, they turn to the cyber platform as the other option. Eventually, this source of comfort will turn into a preference and the individual will end up choosing cyber relationships as opposed to their original primary relationships due to the pros and cons on both ends measured.
The internet has revolutionized all forms of communication since the beginning of its existence. The world has now become smaller' or more like a global village', so to speak. The internet was first used by the U.S military for communications purposes. The internet, from the communication point of view, has brought on new developments and techniques to keep in touch not only for individuals, but for businesses as well. An example of how the internet has impacted communication would be an example of doctors now communicating through live video feeds via the internet with patients or other doctors to diagnose patients or to even guide and advise surgeons through complicated procedures.