Common Core is attempting to create equality among all children that are in the same grade level, no matter where they are from or what level they are currently at in their learning. What Common Core advocates fail to realize is that the Common Core curriculum is actually discouraging children to
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
The Common Core State Standards have made tremendous gains for the world of education. Students nationwide are learning the same standards and skill sets. Nationwide standards are clearly necessary, so one state isn’t far more advanced or lagging behind other states. Not only has the Common Core provided national standards, it has created rigorous standards that encourage critical thinking, and prepare students for college curriculum and careers pursued after their schooling. Before Common Core, teachers could teach anything they wanted without purpose and support. CCSS have required teachers to b...
The Common Core State Standards are simply learning goals that are outlined for the students. This outline is a way to show the students what they should be able to do at the end of each grade. These learning goals are supposed to “provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them” (Top Ten Things to Know, 2015). These certain standards are also supposed to be designed to be “robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in the near future” (Top Ten Things to Know, 2015). Common Core State Standards were actually being introduced while I was attending
The Common Core has been a highly debated educational initiative based in the United States that provides children of all race, religious denomination, and socioeconomic background the same educational path from kindergarten through senior year of high school or the 12th grade. The Common Core provides six standards on its website that serve as its oath. “The standards are: 1. Research- and evidence-based. 2. Clear, understandable, and consistent. 3. Aligned with college and career expectations. 4. Based on rigorous content and application of knowledge through higher-order thinking skills. 5. Built upon the
Common core has been the program calling all the shots in most school systems in the United States. Since the year 2008, the common core standard testing has been sneaking its way into the school systems. The common core has brought up many different situations within the schools. One situation consists of determining the education level of students by using the same standardized test. Another situation is by requiring teachers to teach to a certain test, even though students do not fully learn what they are being taught. The government should not be able to evaluate students and teachers by one certain test. Attention must be brought up to how common core has changed our education system to the unproductive side, but then explain how our schooling systems can fix the problem that has been made. The common core can be fixed for the best, but the most fulfilling way to fix this problem is to get rid of the program altogether. The best results of students’ education can truly be viewed accurately once the common core is fully out of the school curriculum.
In these changing times one of the biggest aspects of society that should be updated on a regular basis is education. Changes in curriculum as well as methods of teaching need to be revised each and every year. With this idea came the idea of the Common Core State Standard which is currently being adopted by forty-four out of fifty states in the United States. This new rework is designed to help better prepare students for college, universities, and the work place. However, not everyone believes this is the right move education should be taking at this moment. Those in support state this is the best decision possible to teach the children of the 21st century. Others say the cause for the decline in the quality of education in the United States stems from other sociological factors not from how the system is currently being worked. Even more are concerned if schools will be ready for this new wave of change. Will Common Core be effective in helping prepare high school graduates for the future? Only time will tell if the Common Core Standards proves effective in further helping students be prepared for the future.
The common core requires higher standards, standards that are supposed to provide children with a deeper understanding of ...
With the common core standards students now will be able to transfer schools and understand what is going on because the Common Core Standard provides a clear understanding to all students of what they are expected to learn. It will provide all of the students with an equal opportunity to learn same curriculum no matter which school they are going to. These standards will not limit the students with different level of achievement among students; instead they will ensure a more consistent exposure to materials and learning experience though instructions and teacher preparation. However, two c...
This concern that the government has, has sparked the standards known as Common Core. The standards created are aimed to create educational quality and equality. The purpose of them is “to ensure students are prepared for today’s entry-level careers, freshman level college courses and workforce training programs” (Common Core).The thought process is that if everyone is learning the same standards it will be easier to measure student 's successes and failures.
The Common Core was designed to be a set of standards with fewer in number yet clearer in describing outcomes, which all students are expected to attain. These standards are organized in a way that will give a sense of connectedness of each grade. To help students achieve these standards, teachers must create a scope and sequence about what needs to be taught along with a pacing guide to keep them on track. A difficulty for teachers is to decide what NOT to teach from existing curriculum. Teachers sometimes get caught up in lessons or activities that they like and the students like even though it may not be in the curriculum. “So, the Common Core State Standards are not adding more work for teachers but allowing them the “power of the eraser” over the “power of the pen.” (Sandra M. Alberti, 2012, p.4)
Drew, S. V. (2012). Open up the Ceiling on the Common Core State Standards: PREPARING STUDENTS FOR 21ST-CENTURY LITERACY—NOW. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, (4). 321. Retrieved 29 March 2017 from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com .proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=9&sid=038c2a83-68e8-498d-8bc0-74dee409185b%40sessionmgr103&hid=117
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
The cost for teachers, kids and schools is just too high for a brand new standard that hasn’t been proven to work. But there is no reason to say that it couldn’t work. The first step starts with each state's education department. By laying out each standard and making it clear on what kids are suppose to know, teachers can teach the proper way. The next step in making Common Core better is hearing experts on childhood development to rewrite the standards. The original Common Core standards were written by people who have never worked in education. It is clear that the current school system needs some reform, but with a little work, Common Core can be good for our
As a final point, the following points are the sum up of what and why I am not in favor with the Common Core: