Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of private school and public school
Comparison of private school and public school
Comparison of private school and public school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of private school and public school
Commercialization of education has resulted in making education a business. Student-teacher relationship becoming the same as that of a service provider who offers you its services in return for money. This has led to Public institutes, students think that teachers are oblige to provide customer service to students. The author gives us three arguments: the reason for commercialization, why it is important and why (or how) it should be stopped.
The need for commercialization argument asserts that due the decline of public funding, rising costs, greater expectancy by students for housing has led to commercialization of education. If colleges or universities shift away from corporate culture than there will be job, program cuts and in corporate terms there will be downsizing. Students generate income for colleges and in return colleges have to provide them services. Students in return for their money expect better services like faster grading, fewer lectures, more lectures, more preparation, clearer grading standards, etc. This has led to commercialization and/or corporatization of education. The argument is strong but it just considers the fact about job losses associated without commercialization.
The argument about why commercialization or running colleges like corporates should not be done is asserted by giving us these following arguments. According to the author, If teachers are asked to change their attitude to treat students like customers- which essentially means following the golden selling rule that customer is always right, then instructors will have to work in order to make his student’s life better. The author feels that a change in attitude by either teachers or students will result in decrease in quality of ed...
... middle of paper ...
...ument. None of the two arguments are strong. If the author adds more reasons to the why it is important and why it should be stopped argument and closes the loop hole it currently possess the article could be a strong message to the institutes.
I do support the authors argument that commercialization of education is bad and needs to be stopped. The reasoning of the author is weak. If commercialization of the education is good since it gives power to the student then it doesn’t mean teacher need to be under control of students too. The author forgets to mention about feedback and comment form which help’s faculty know their wrong doing and improve every year. Nor does the argument talk about making the class intuitive enough to give every student an opportunity to understand the subject.
Works Cited
http://chronicle.com/article/faculty-memembers-are-not/145363
William Deresiewicz comments on this statement by claiming that only the commercial purpose now survives as a recognized value. This statement makes me think about my friend, Jacky, who’s a college freshman this year. Jacky told me that his goal in life is to move to California and become a social worker. It’s already been around two weeks since college started for Jacky and he claims he hates it. In order to make his dreams come true, he has to take the required classes.This to me shows that he doesn’t seem to be into the whole college experience but he’s in it for the degree in order to fulfill his
This article points out the flaws in our modern education systems. Students should enjoy school and feel as though they are learning important things in the subjects offered. The classes can be altered to tend to the interests of children, so they can properly express themselves. School should be preparing children to be mature, how to handle hard situations, and ultimately prepare them for their future lives. Overall, Gatto’s article has its flaws, but it can be used to help improve the education system for upcoming
As the article suggested there is an increase in the requirement of a higher education to maintain a well-paid job although, there is an “avalanche of over-qualification” (177) in the workforce. The author indirectly indicates his audience, as being academics of all ages in the university system. The author evokes emotional stimulation from his audience as he stated, “[t]here’s still a reason to get an education! It’s just not anything to do with education” (177). Further indicating a debate regarding the stance of the education system being a business rather than pleasure organization. Through playful language, the author is able to maintain the audience's interest and persuade them into solely seeing the education system as a system with bearing resemblance to the democratic system. Relying on all three rhetorical appeals, the author truly utilizes his language to convey a distinct tone and voice from his argument. Appealing to his audience, the author uses this article to inform them of a false consciousness many academics seem to have, as it is the tendency to believe and define oneself in support of the very system which oppresses them. The bases of the authors argument are to grasp the view of the majority of the scholars and push them to think the same way he does as a
What stands out about American universities today? Is it the academic opportunities offered to students, experienced faculty, or strong sense of community? Or...perhaps they have lost their focus. It is not uncommon for universities to focus their efforts and budgets elsewhere; by building state of the art gyms, for example, remodeling luxury dorms, grooming campuses, or creating more management positions. College students and professors alike are subject to the nationally occurring changes in higher level education. Colleges are becoming commercialized and tuition is rising, but is the quality of education improving? In “Why We Should Fear University, Inc.”, Fredrik DeBoer is able to provide a personal take on the issue of corporate domination
Juveniles are being taught that in order to have a nice car, branded cloths and the house of their dreams, by getting into an expensive mortgage, they have to be an employee of a huge corporation. In addition, they have to undergo to a prestigious school, study hard, have excellent grades in order to become popular and respectable in the world. However, many people would not become those super leaders, but these majority of people have a great role in the capitalism society of the US. As Gatto says, “We buy televisions, and then we buy the things we see on the television. We buy computers, and then we buy the things we see on the computer. We buy $150 sneakers whether we need them or not, and when they fall apart too soon we buy another pair” (38). Such results are in part of a wrong education that teenagers have received trough many decades. In addition, Gatto highlights that modern educational system has been working in a six basic functions methods that makes the system strong and unbreakable: The adjustable function, indulge students to respect authorities. The integrating function, which builds the personality of the students as similar to each other as possible. The diagnostic and directive function, which allows a school to set permanent scholar grades in order to determinate his or her future role in society. The differentiating function, which gives to the student a good education and after his or her role is diagnosed, they prevent any educational progress. The selective function, function that the system has used to prevent academic growth for the non-selected students. The propaedeutic function, which works in the selection of specific groups of intellectual adults to keep perpetuating the system all over again making it a continuous sequence. (Gatto 34). Gatto’s facts revealed the survival of the educational system for decades,
Shown in the essay, they are worth nothing and teach nothing, ”online courses are perhaps one of the most complete expressions of the denigration of university education (Srigley),” there is no good side of online classes shown. There is nothing to show how online learning is making learning accessible,”work online with no direct support from a faculty member. Digital lectures for live classes with real students? Sounds expensive. How about no lectures, no students, and, best of all, no professor (Srigley).”
According to Turner (2006), for-profit institutions are more responsive to the changes in the external environment and are able to capitalize on new opportunities. The growth among for-profit institutions can be attributed to their ability for geographic variation and catering to the need of non-traditional students for increased educational access. The geographic variation references the inability of non-for-profit educational institutions to adjust to changes in state, regional, and local demand due to political and social forces. For-profits' flexibility in their governance structure, sensitivity to market conditions, and the ability to generate investment capital through public and private means allow them to establish themselves in new and emerging markets regardless of career and location. Also, for-profit institutions are able to conceptualize the geographic boundaries of education that constrain traditional educational institutions. Therefore, for-profit hold a competitive advantage over non-profit institutions in attracting the expanding market of the aforementioned non-tradit...
"Should schools accept corporate advertising and sponsorships?" NEA Today Oct.2006: 43. Academic Search Complete. Web. 25 Apr. 2011.
Kirp, David L. "The 'for profit' college an educational alternative." Current. 457 (Nov 2003): 25(6). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Clark College - Cannell Library. 28 May. 2011
Due to the effects of higher enrolment, teaching methods are now directed towards suiting the masses, thus everything has become less personal, as well as, less educationally in depth. Teaching techniques consist of multiple choice tests, rather than written answer questions which require critical analysis, as Jacobs states “So many papers to mark, relative to numbers and qualities of mentors to mark them, changed the nature of test papers. Some came to consist of “True or False?” and “Which of the following is correct?” types of questions” (Jacobs 49). While teachers also no longer engage in one on one conversations with students, but merely in a lecture hall among masses and everyone is seen as just a student number. Jacobs states a complaint from a student “who claimed they were shortchanged in education. They had expected more personal rapport with teachers” (Jacobs 47). Universities are too much focused on the cost benefit analysis, of the problem of increased enrolment, with the mind set of “quantity trumps quality” (Jacobs 49). The benefit of student education and learning is not being put first, but rather the expansion of the university to benefit financial issues. Taylor states “individualism and the expansion of instrumental reason, have often been accounted for as by-products
According to Beder (1992), successful market-driven programs must have "sufficient numbers of voluntary adult learners who are motivated to exchange enough of their time and money to yield the clients and fee income" needed to operate programs (p. 70). This need to target areas of high demand leads to what Beder sees as the primary problems of market-driven systems: (1) they perpetuate inequality by neglecting the needs of those less able to pay; (2) they may meet individual needs efficiently but not overarching social needs; and (3) they often displace educational benefit with profit as an overriding goal. Rittenburg (1984) agrees that the demands of the marketplace are not a sufficient foundation for continuing education: "The nature of aesthetic and ideological products is such that production to meet consumer demand is not an adequate framework" (p. 22) because such products have intrinsic value.
Students are more willing to learn if the relationships between the students and the teachers are on the same level. This type of teaching helps the students learn how to be respectful, understanding and being able to compromise outside of the college campus. It also teaches students self-motivation and time management. When teacher are extremely aggressive on their class requirement students tend to confine and hold back and do just what they were required to. Students don’t go fair and beyond what they are able to achieve. According to author, Mano Singham, in his essay “Moving Away From the Authoritarian Classroom” he states “I could not make students care about the work, be creative and original, be considerate of others, or write and speak well. All I could do was force them to do was very specific things” (450), Singham is referring to the strict and legalistic syllabus he used to provide his students. This type of authoritarian teaching is extremely difficult on students. It restrains the student’s possibilities and outcomes. When teaches share responsibilities and authorities with the students it prepares the students to be part of a community and a work
John Taylor Gatto, in his essay “Against School: How Public Education Cripples our Kids, and why”, argues that the contemporary purpose of education in public schools is to produce “harmless electorate,” “a servile labor force,” and “mindless consumers” (28). According to Gatto, he is blaming public schools by explain that the purpose of education is to shape students to certain expectations and habits without their interests. He argues that students “want to be doing something real” (Gatto 23). Also, He explains that they produce a manageable working class and “mindless consumers” (27-28). His point is that students want to learn something new that help them in their life better than actual books from school which don’t apply their interests and their experience (23). So he recommends home-schooling as option to schools (24). Gatto claims that contemporary schools “adopted one of the very worst aspect...
Education is man’s most valuable possession: it is the concept through which one’s love for learning stems, and the equipment used to pave an individual’s path to success. Although easily influenced by the opinions of others, education is one of the few concepts that neither internal nor external stress can strip from our being. The future of our society lies in the hands of our educators; the values and morals instilled by such figures govern the actions of the earth’s people.
Commercialization of education is a new trend that has resulted in reforms in the education sector. The commercialization of education can be seen through the increase of private schools and institutions. This privatization has introduced the financial element to the qualifications necessary for education, especially in regard to higher education. Commercialization of education requires structural adjustments, shifts in accountability and reconceptualization of the education system. This commercialization has an effect on many households and therefore changes the whole concept of education, especially the student teacher relationship, the purposes of education and the attitudes towards education. Commercialization of education has a greater effect on the stakeholders involved, such as the student’s teachers, administrators and parents because of the shift from the vertical relationship in a horizontal relationship where the role of the teachers and that of the student changes to that of a business and clients (Bok 75).