Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fall of the Soviet Union
Soviet Union collapse
Soviet Union collapse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The fall of the Soviet Union
Angela Brown
Kelly Bettencourt
Advisory 11
18 March 2014
The Collapse of the Soviet Union
The symbols of communism are the hammer and sickle, against a red backdrop, drawn in the middle of a star. If these symbols represent a strong society which thrived so well, then why was the hammer brought down so hard on the Soviet Union in 1991? First the cause of the decline of the Soviet Union will be discussed. Then the details that caused the collapse of the Soviet Union altogether will be described. Lastly, the actions that could have been taken to prevent the fall of the great country will be explained.
As with most events in history, there were many varying factors as to why the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. These factors included, but were not limited to: a stagnating economy, the Afghanistan Quagmire, Perestroika, decentralization, Glasnost, the Chernobyl disaster, local nationalism, lack of economic incentives, excessive military focus, reduced motivation of fear, and ethnic fragmentation. With the government focusing on so many unnecessary things, as well as being transparent and secretive, and the people becoming more nationalistic and wanting their own freedom away from the government, it is not surprising that the Union fell so drastically. In order for a country to thrive successfully, it has to have a strong and stable economy, otherwise it cannot support itself or its people, and the government will crumble to pieces. The Soviet Union was a huge country; so huge, in fact, that it became too much of a hassle to continue state planning. The complex Soviet economy became too large to be managed by state planners. This resulted in the failure to respond in a timely manner to continuou...
... middle of paper ...
...rked for the Chernobyl Disaster and local nationalism. The government should have provided more incentives to reverse the economy, gaining support of the people. Part of strengthening the economy would have been the Soviet not partaking in such extreme military build-up. Finally, if propaganda was not so focused on Slavic ethnicity, and Russia viewed as the most dominant state, non-Russian groups would have stayed within the country during hard times, strengthening the overall civilization.
In the end, the collapse of the Soviet Union was caused by the corrupt government and the people within it. The cause of the decline of the Soviet Union has been discussed. Then the details that caused the collapse of the Soviet Union altogether have been described. Lastly, the actions that could have been taken to prevent the fall of the great country have been explained.
In conclusion, there were six long-term causes that were apparent during the preceding decades of the 1991 collapse. On the surface in the 1970s the Soviet Union seemed to be doing ok, but the underlying factors eventually played a large factor in the eventual demise of the Communist regime and the fall of the Soviet Union. In the year 1975 the Soviet Union’s power peaked and after that it was only downhill for the Soviet Union until it collapsed in 1991.
The arms race the Soviet Union had been involved in with NATO had bankrupted their economy. This in turn affected the people, when the economy started to collapse, the people started to lose their jobs, were not able to get the basic necessities from the local stores. In most cases when one form of government can not provide the basic needs for their people, then the people will look for a form of government that can provide for them. Then there is one aspect of human nature that the Communist Party in the Soviet Union was not able to control and the desire of the people of Eastern Europe to be free of Soviet control. Before World War II, the countries that made up Eastern Europe had been independent countries able to decide their own fate.
It also marked the end of cold war between the Soviet Union and United States leading to reformed political, economic and military alliances worldwide. Upon its formation, outcome of Bolshevick Revolution of 1917, Soviet Union adopted Socialism later transforming to Communism. The main objective for Socialism and eventual Communism was to create a unified state based on centralized economic and political system. This ideology later transformed into totalitarian state. The underestimation of resistance from non-Russian ethnic groups (which was more than 50% of total population), and failure of the communism system to meet economic needs of the people were some of the reasons which to led to the decline of the USSR economy and arms competition with United States. Despite the Government’s effort to instill the ideology of communism to its people, it never took firm roots and Government ended up losing the grip of the people. With the political and economic stagnations caused by the communism, there was no choice but to change the way of doing things leading to dissolution of USSR in December 1991. The fifteen newly formed countries had overwhelming tasks of developing the economy, reorganizing the political systems, and settling the territorial disputes created earlier. There has been wars in the boundaries of the former
The end of the Cold War was one of the most unexpected and important events in geopolitics in the 20th century. The end of the Cold War can be defined as the end of the bipolar power struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union, which had existed since the end of the World War II. The conclusion of the Cold War can be attributed to Gorbachev’s series of liberalizations in the 1980s, which exposed the underlying economic problems in the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc states that had developed in the 1960s and 70s and prevented the USSR from being able to compete with the US as a superpower. Nevertheless, Reagan’s policies of a renewed offensive against communism, Gorbachev’s rejection of the Brezhnev doctrine and the many nationalities
The purpose of this investigation is to assess how significant Mikhail Gorbachev’s Glasnost, and Perestroika polices contribute to the collapse of the USSR. In order to understand how significant of a factor Gorbachev policies were to the collapse of the USSR, we will investigate from how significant were the reforms emplaced by Gorbachev, to how the USSR was doing economically from the time Gorbachev came into power. The main sources for this investigation range from an Excerpt from The cold war: The United States and the Soviet union by Ronald Powaski who states facts about both the economic and political issues of the time. Excerpts from “New political thinking” from perestroika by Gorbachev which states how he believes new political ideas are for the good for the USSR. Finally in The Dissolution of the Soviet Union by Myra Immell who goes over many of the factors of the USSR’s collapse.
boosted the USSR’s economy. Therefore Stalin had created a country which seemed corrupt at the time, but later on it improved by the hard work Stalin had forced upon them.
In 1945, most of the countries around the world are devastated further to World War II which had stroke the globe for six years. Only the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, also called USSR, seem to be in a stable economic situation despite weighty losses. Both states are considered to be the great winners of the war and this is the beginning of a confrontation between two superpowers but also the confrontation between two distinct ideologies: communism and capitalism.
happened ? What did the Soviet Union do wrong to cause a breakdown of their
to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a
The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.
The cold war was failed by the Soviet Union for many reasons, including the sudden collapse of communism (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) This sudden collapse of communism was brought on ultimately by internal factors. The soviet unions president Gorbachev’s reforms: glasnost (openness) and perestroika (political reconstructering) ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev’s basics for glasnost were the promotion of principles of freedom to criticize; the loosening of controls on media and publishing; and the freedom of worship. His essentials of perestroika were, a new legislature; creation of an executive presidency; ending of the ‘leading role’ of the communist party; allowing state enterprises to sell part of their product on the open market; lastly, allowing foreign companies to own Soviet enterprises (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) Gorbachev believed his reforms would benefit his country, but the Soviet Union was ultimately held together by the soviet tradition he was trying to change. The Soviet Union was none the less held together by “…powerful central institutions, pressure for ideological conformity, and the threat of force.
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.
middle of paper ... ... Exploring the October revolution and the establishment of communism, Richard Pipes concludes that the origin of communism can be traced back to the distant past of Russia’s history. Pipes states that Russia had entered a period of crisis after the governments of the 19th century undertook a limited attempt at capitalisation, not trying to change the underlying patrimonial structures of Russian society. (Pipes, 1964) An unrelenting series of war’s, unnecessary hunger and famine and the selfish greed of the ruling elite.
...of World War I hampered those efforts as all resources and manpower was being devoted to the war effort taking an enormous toll on the newly formed working class. As they began to suffer from famine and poor working conditions they began to grow angry with the Empire that ultimately lead them to revolt against the Tsar. During Tsar Nicholas II he made many mistakes that led to the demise of the Empire. Taking command of the Army during World War I and leaving the Tsarina in charge proved to be a horrible blunder. Rasputin was able to influence decisions that Tsarina made angering many citizens and politicians in the Duma. In a last ditch effort to save the Empire Nicholas II failed to act and as a result he payed with his life along with his family. Although, brutal the Russian Revolution was it was needed for the nation of Russia to advance itself in the world.
The alliance that had formed between two super powers, U.S and USSR during World War II was not strong enough to overcome the past decades of suspicion and unease between the two nations. Unwilling to compromise because of paranoia about their postwar national security created high tension atmosphere in U.S- Soviet Union’s relationship. This unstable partnership finally cracked due to the defeat of Nazi German: An unnatural alliance that was bound to fall apart after the defeat of the common enemy can be considered the origin of the Cold War.The Cold War had an enormous impact on the United States politically, socially, and economically including Red hunts, unconditionally fear of Communism and McCarthyism in the period 1940s-1950s, also shaped U.S.’s political agendas. This war ended as the reform programs introduced by Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev, which unexpectedly led to the collapse of Soviet Union. The...