Cohort Study

1190 Words3 Pages

The research article titled “Risk of Clostridium difficile diarrhea among hospital inpatients prescribed proton pump inhibitors: cohort and case–control studies” by Dial et al. was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ). The objective of this study was to investigate whether the proton pump inhibitors are an independent risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. C. difficile is the most common cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea. It is believed that antibiotic disruption of the normal intestinal flora, resulting in overgrowth of C. difficile and leading to this type of diarrhea. Some studies reported a possible association of C. difficile diarrhea and acid suppressive therapy. Since, the proton pump …show more content…

Both of the studies found similar results for the association, in spite of performing different study design, having different population and confounders; therefore the findings might be valid. But still there were some factors which could make the result biased. In the cohort study, all the required information of the participants was not available. So the result could be due to confounding. Therefore, the researchers performed a case-control study to assess and mitigate the possible selection bias and confounding. However, in the case-control study still had some selection bias and confounding effect. This study selected the sicker patients and more female patients as cases than control. This would make possibility of confounding in the observed results due to severity that the sicker patients are more susceptible to develop C. difficile diarrhea may also had a higher probability of receiving PPIs. The sicker patients are supervised more cautiously, so the chance of getting the outcome is more among them. The above mentioned points denote that further evaluation is needed to make any conclusion due to existing source of confounding though the results might not be

Open Document