Abraham H. Maslow developed the Hierarchy of Needs model between 1943-54 in USA, and this theory remains valid even today for understanding human motivation, management training and personal development. (4) A. H. Maslow first introduced his idea of hierarchy of needs in his paper “A Theory of Human Motivation” and his succeeding book Motivation and Personality in 1943. He stated that people are motivated to achieve certain needs and they are intended to fulfil basic needs before moving on to other, more advanced needs and when one need is fulfilled they move on the next one, and so on. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs includes five motivational needs, often displayed as a hierarchical pyramid with five levels. This five level model can be divided into basic needs or deficiency needs and growth needs. The four lower levels are considered basic needs and the top level is considered growth needs. The five different level of hierarchy of needs are:
Individual’s “possess inner needs and are motivated by the desire to fulfill these needs” (Phillips & Gully, 2014). Abraham Maslow, and Clay Alderfer offer two separate models that explore the needs of individuals. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs contests that people have five levels of needs which they progress. Alderfer suggests there are three groups of individual needs and he views his model more as a continuum rather than a hierarchy. (Phillips & Gully, 2014) The lowest level on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs depicts an individual’s basic physiological needs for food, water, and comfort. This need runs parallel to Alderfer’s existence needs that describes an individual’s desire for physical and material well-being. The second level on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is safety and security needs such as ones desire for health, and job security. The third level on Maslow’s hierarchy is social needs for friendship and belonging which coordinates to Alderfer’s relatedness needs; desires for respect and relationships with others. The fourth level on Maslow’s hierarchy is self-esteem needs for self-respect and respect for others. The last and highest level on Maslow’s hierarchy is self-actualization needs which include self-fulfillment and the realization of one’s full potential. Alderfer’s growth needs which describe ones desire to make useful and productive contributions coincides with Maslow’s self-actualization needs. (Phillips
The credible version of hierarchy of needs of Maslow (1943, 1954), have five motivational levels that are arranged in a pyramid with depicted levels. The stages are divided in basic needs which include, psychological, love, safety, and esteem. These needs are also primary of deficiency needs. The other needs are growth needs which incorporate self-actualization needs. When basic needs are not met, they are said to motivate people. The strength of the desire of such needs depends with the time in which they are denied. For example, the more a person lacks food, the hungrier that person becomes. Basic needs must be satisfied before a person proceeds to satisfy other needs in the higher levels. When basic needs are satisfied reasonably, the person can now strive at achieving the self-actualization level, which is the highest level.
Abraham Maslow’s- Hierarchy of Needs, “Self-Actualization”
Abraham Maslow arranged human needs into a hierarchy of five needs, starting with the most important needs which are physiological needs such as, hunger, thirst, and warmth. He then went all the way up to the least important which is self-actualization that is known as the fulfillment of unique potentials. His hierarchy of needs is depicted in a pyramidal form with the most important needs at the bottom as a base and the least important towards the top. According to Maslow, self-actualization is becoming what we believe we are capable of being he also believed that self -actualization is as important as physiological needs. Many people desire to reach self-actualization because
Theoretical Framework
Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) emphasizes cognitive-person variables that enable people to influence their own career development, as well as extra-person, contextual variables, which enhance or constrain personal agency (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994). SCCT attempts to understand the processes through which people form interests, make choices, and achieve varying levels of success in educational and occupational pursuits (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 2000). Cognitive-person variables include qualities such as self-efficacy and personal goals that enable people to exercise personal control or agency in their own career development; while environmental variables consider a person’s physical attributes, features of their environment, and particular learning experiences which have influence on career-related interests and choice behaviors. Environmental variables can be further divided into two basic categories according to their relative proximity to the career choice-making process. Distal factors are those which have had an impact on the learning experiences through which expectations have developed, for instance the type of career role models to which one is exposed and the support or encouragement one receives for engaging in
Introduction:
Motivation is necessary in every business organisation and employees are an important component as they need to be motivate either extrinsically or intrinsically, which is key to achieving organisational success (Bagga, 2014). Therefore, in today’s competitive world both employees and organisations must align their motivations in order to achieve these goals. Consequently, there are various theories of motivation which can be divided into to two groups which are Content theories that focus on employee needs and Process theories that focus on what motivates employees (Armstrong, 2005). The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of the three theories Maslow Hierarchy of Needs, Equity Theory and Expectancy Theory and what impact they can have on employee motivation and the impact
Goal Contents Theory compliments the major aspects of Organismic Theory and Basic Needs Theory by addressing the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations. It is critical to differentiate between intrinsic and extrinsic goals because these goals have a profound influence on psychological well-being and motivational processes. For example, I work at Charlie’s Chicken part-time. Unfortunately, I do not enjoy the job very much at all. I am simply working there to make ends meet until I finish college. Although I feel like I am a good employee that keeps up with my work, my goals at this job are very extrinsic in nature and this most definitely has an influence on my psychological well-being and the quality of motivation and engagement that I exert while at this job. I hope to maintain intrinsic goals in whatever future career I end up in, and I am confident that intrinsic goals could enhance my psychological well-being, motivation, and engagement in a career that I deem intrinsically
Social Cognitive Career Theory is of great interest to me. This is the theory I will apply in my counseling approach with others. Through this theoretical lens, I will apply my own career decision making process. I will explore the environmental factors that have influenced me, as well as, my interest. The theory’s building blocks are based on self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and goals.
The Theory suggests that Maslow’s higher-order needs are similar to Herzberg’s satisfier factors, and Maslow’s lower-order needs are similar to Herzberg’s hygiene factors (Ellsworth, Hawley, & Mau, 2008). According to Herzberg, et al., (1959), motivation factors are internal factors that are associated with higher-order needs, and include the opportunity to achieve in the job, recognition of accomplishment, challenging work and growth options, responsibility in the job, and the work itself – if the work is interesting (Amos, et al., 2008). The presence of intrinsic factors or motivators lead to job satisfaction, but their absence will not lead to job dissatisfaction (Perrachione, et al.,
Self-actualization is described (Maslow’s.org) as “realizing personal potential, self-fulfillment and seeking personal growth and peak experiences.” While employees must take this journey independently, the journey is much easier in an environment that supports new opportunities and advancement. As per the The Lincoln Electric Company case study, management has the complete authority to do as they see fit. We learned that the management at the Lincoln Company can make someone work overtime or make them work a short week. Management can move an employee from one job to another, it is their call. This exposes employees’ to different opportunities and