Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
leadership styles-insight
compare different leadership styles
leadership styles-insight
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: leadership styles-insight
Leadership has many definitions: some people think leadership means guiding or motivates others to complete a task. However, Guenzi and Ruta (2013) define leadership as the ability to impact others within an organisation. As from Hoye , Aaron CT, et al. (2015) definition of leadership simply means developing goals through others. The term “leadership” is therefore all mentioned above: in brief, it is the ability to take someone’s hand and lead them. The leadership styles, theories and competencies’ of Barack Obama will be examined and discusses throughout this essay.
As an overview, leadership theory consist of firstly, Great man theory that is leaders who have been born with qualities and are meant to lead (Bolden, Marturano & Dennison,
…show more content…
According to the report “Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader” (2016) coercive style is a one- way communication, where the leader give directions that needs to follow. This style is mainly used in a critical situation or when protocol needs to monitor. Alongside there is authoritative, where the leader makes a clear vision for the followers. Also, the leader with this type of style has the ability to win over the interest of his follower’s to walk in the same path (Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader, 2016). Hence, this is effective especially when a new employees started work and need guidance.
Continuously, there is the affiliative style which means that a leader creates a positive harmony for his employees (Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader, 2016). In other words, that leader put people first and tasks second. The Democratic leader focuses on the decision making, also, the employees in this organisation have the skills, knowledge require. Therefore, the leader trust them in their
…show more content…
Barack Obama leadership styles help for the success of the country and also the world.
However, his leadership styles can have a negative impact on the employees such as uncertain if they are doing the right thing, sometimes employees can be too confident in themselves that they do the job inappropriately and sometimes when the leader trusts them a lot they do not feel pressured to perform their task. They might take too much time for one task as stated in Owen (2006).
In general, leaders are born with their gifts, some of them are define from their pasts. Leaders has different styles such as coercive that is following strictly the orders of the leader, authoritative is guiding others, affiliative is mainly people come first, democratic is asking question to the employees and let them find the solution while, pacesetting is do as I am doing now whereas coaching is trying to develop their skills and theories is important and combine the ten competencies in order for their organisation to be successful. However, Barack Obama is a democratic leader with a democratic style and have integrity, trust, values, and empathy as competencies. Hence, a leader needs to know when and how to use his gift in the situation he found
Leadership is something that as humans we strive to be good at. It’s a skill that can be fostered in school, homes and sports. As Americans we often turn to those in leadership positions to help us during troubling times. Many great leaders have been born out of grave tragedy, when one person can show strength, wisdom and courage we celebrate them. Our country is driven by men and women who are out into leadership roles. Congress and government have their fair share of both positive and negative leaders. One perfect example of leadership is the position of the American President. Being the leader of the free world comes with immense pressure. Throughout history we have been able to see different men take on this role. No one has ever done the job perfectly but some presidents have made a stronger imprint on our society then others. Our twenty sixth president, Theodore Roosevelt, is one of those presidents, despite hardships and tragedies his passion for a better America was his motivation to fight for the country he loved.
The part of the speech where I noticed his readiness to lead was when he said he could not disown Reverend Wright, his former pastor. Reverend Wright had said things that completely went against Obama’s campaign. Most politicians would have berated the man and denied any relations with him. Obama instead acknowledged what distasteful things the Reverend had said, but also defended the man by explaining what time period his former pastor grew up in. These comments Obama made convinces me Obama is fit to lead. If only focusing on the ability to be a leader, I believe most Americans would agree that Obama was qualified to take
...esearch of the situation. This leadership style is beneficial in situations where a quick decision is necessary. The downside to this type of leadership is people who tend to use an autocratic leadership style are seen as controlling and dictatorial. This type of behavior can lead to resentment with the other group members.
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
...ader should understand their employees. As discussed the authoritarian leadership is not the best way. As a leader one must include the subordinates into a team and respect their opinions. Leaders should know how to motivate by encouragement and to find out what your employees want and find a way to give it to them or to enable them to earn it.
Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behaviour of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action (Barnard, 1938).It is the ultimate act which brings to success all of the potent potential that is in an organisation and its people and it transforms potential to reality (LEADERSHIP THEORIE...
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and inspire others (Gill, 2006). It is therefore defined as a process whereby a leader influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2013). A leader has to make a decision for something to happen and provide his followers with clear direction (Rost et al, 1991). It will evoke feelings of challenge, excitement and involvement for the followers to proceed with the task (Gill, 2006).
This style has been defined as ( Abdicates responsibilities avoid making decisions)(Robbins 2001). That would mean leaders are not involved in taking decisions at all and they are available only to provide their employees with materials and answering questions, the subordinates have complete freedom to take decisions and set objectives (Chaudhry and Husnain 2012). In other words, this theory lacks any kind on powerful leadership. Hence, there would be lack of motivation, low levels of performance, and poor work practices(Packard 2009). However, if the employees are already motivated and have full understanding and high level of knowledge regarding the mission at hand, Lassies- Faire model might works fine (Gustainis and Roosevelt 2004) .
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
While nature versus nurture is still an ongoing argument today, in terms of leadership it is widely believed that nurture is what plays the primary role...
Leaders influence a perfect working environment that motivates employees to adopt positive thinking (Suhariadi, 2016). Besides, leaders should instill skills and mentorship skills to employs so that they can realize their goals and performed towards achieving them in a dignified way (Sia, & Appu, 2015). Conscientiousness is also a factor that is believed to build firmly is the mode of leadership embraced by the organization. For instance, in the case of a transformational form of guidance adoption, both leaders and workers will be focusing to achieve the best through innovation and sharing. Importantly, great openness is encouraged in the directive leadership styles. This implies that workers become open with major ideas that can be used to implement change in the entire company. In other words, leadership can be used to improve work performance through a selection of the right individuals. This involves in terms of determining an individual personality that contribute a great advantage to their well-being of the institution (Isaksen, Kaufmann, & Bakken, 2014). An individual character determines their ability to perform have a positive thinking. Therefore, from a psychological perspective, it becomes easier to tell the type of people who can deliver quality
When people think of leadership so many things rush through their heads. For example am I a leader, am I apart of a group that has a leader, and what does being a leader mean? A common definition of being a leader is a person who leads or guides a group of people. So now knowing the definition of a leader who pops into your head; Phil Jackson, Mike Krzyzewski, Martin Luther King Jr.? All of these people are great leaders, but the real question is why are they so great? One very important thing that all these men have in common is they have a philosophy of leadership. This philosophy is going to help guide these men during turbulent times, or when they need guidance themselves. Nobody is perfect and everyone needs direction no matter how wise or gifted you are. I am no different, which is why writing this philosophy of leadership is going to be a fruitful experience for years to come.
We can divide the theories that deal with leadership in 3 chronological groups. First were the trait theories. Until the 1940's, research in the field of leadership was dominated by these theories. Second came the behavioral theories which were very influent until the late 1960's. Finally, contingency theories are the most modern theories about leadership.
According to Shockley and Zalabak (2009) "Leadership is a process of guiding individuals, groups, and entire organization in establishing goals and sustaining action to support goals.Leadership is like mapping out where you need to go to win". A Leader is a person who has a strong personality and who has an ability to manage people and work. He is also the person who is able to direct people .Usually a leaders has a lot of attributes that