The Downside of Living Together More and more couples today live together or "play house" before taking the matrimonial plunge. Living together before marriage has become so popular that approximately half the couples in America participate in this activity (Gorrell 16). Some couples choose to live together to test their compatibility and possibly avoid an unsuccessful marriage. With the number of marriages ending in divorce these days, it sounds reasonable that many couples want to give marriage a trial run before making any formal commitment. But do the chances of a successful marriage actually improve by cohabiting?
Couples who are engaged to be married before they move into together have better communication skills, more confidence in marriage, stronger relationship quality, and fewer negative interactions. Therefore, couples who live together before marriage have poorer relationship outcomes than couples who live together that are engaged or married. The first factor to why premarital cohabiters have an increased risk of divorce is because they are “sliding into their marriages”, formally this is known as relationship inertia. This means that the couple simply gets married because they were living together (“The Cohabitation”, 2014). Partners find it complicated to end the relationship before marriage because of all their investments made into the relationship, for instance, all the energy, time, and money.
Second, arranged marriages have more advantages than modern marriages. Arranged marriages can preserve religion and identity and help people to find their mates in the same social class. Arranged marriages can outlast modern marriages because couples can avoid social and religions disharmony. Finally, young people prefer arranged marriage to modern marriage. Young people would spend less time to find their mate because their parents, chat rooms and dating websites help find mates for them.
When times get tough, it’s much more difficult especially for young couples. Financially speaking, young people usually don’t have as much as other people. So, living together eliminates that burden in the relationship and lets couples focus on the actually relationship instead of fighting over money. The next reason is that it will test your relationship to see if each person is compatiable enough for marriage in the future. Many times couples do decide to give it a shot and move in together.
Smaller weddings can save money to use for the honeymoon later. Getting a small list of guest together is much easier. The decorations could be homemade to save money and not so many of them will be needed since the space will be smaller. Still have to pick out the colors but not feeling overwhelmed because it’s a small get together. Sending out invites will be cheaper because there wouldn’t be as many.
However, I believe that there is no such thing as depending on someone or taking away someone’s freedom in married life. Two married persons have to work things out together to make them feel comfortable. That is why I think that married life is better than single life in terms of offering financial cooperation, happiness, and a long and healthy life. First of all, getting married is better than staying single because marriage creates a more stable finances. Due to the fact that singles have fewer financial commitments to, their expenses are big.
One article states “children of parents who remain married generally enjoy greater emotional, social, and economic advantages than children with divorced or never-married parents”(McGuinness & Teena, 2006). Therefore there should be some kind of policy placed trying to keep parents who are already married together for their children if the environment is not too hostile. The article even states that “in theory, by increasing the number of children raised by married parents, children's overall well-being will also improve”(McGuinness & Teena, 2006). Therefore, making a policy to try to decrease divorce rates of couples who have children like some of the couples in the film could not only decrease divorce rates but also decrease the amount of children living in
However, it is the unwilling partner who experiences the greatest change over time, because as they become accustomed to their newly single life, they begin to acknowledge that their well-being is much better off. The research also supports that while divorce can create intense distress initially, it tends to dissipate and dissolve eventually. This is consistent with the crisis hypothesis, but for some people, the divorce may provide to be a chronic problem whose negative effects outlast those with similar circumstances. As previously stated, it would be beneficial to target couples at risk of getting divorce if they do not have a troublesome marriage. They could receive counseling to prevent the mental health issues that may accompany the ending of a problem less marriage.
Living Together Before Marriage As the rate of divorce soars and as increasing numbers of marriages disintegrate, living together has become the popular alternative to many people in north America. Expersts estimate that "roughly 2.2 million people are currently sharing bed and board in a live-in arrangement, this is approximately 1% of the total population."("Family." Comptoms Encyclopedia. 1992 ed.) Living together, more formally known as non marital cohabitation, is an emerging lifestyle.
A civil union does very little for homosexual couples and do... ... middle of paper ... ...ad more meaning to them then everyone will get what they want. Same sex marriage is a thing of the future, it will happen no matter what. People just need a common ground to look at. And that common ground is being able to be considered a family with the one you love no matter what gender they are. And having better tax benefits and increasing the economy so everyone lives a better life.