Close Reading

1265 Words3 Pages

Of all of Ferris’ characters Tom Mota expresses a willingness to break out of conformity and escape the corporate mindset he has adopted for so long. However serious the intention is, Tom finds himself compelled in this passage to make a mockery of the culture he has been a part of by returning to his old work place. This compulsion exposes Tom’s continued association with the environment, making clear that he finds it problematic to move on. As Ferris suggests, conformity in modern day America is all-pervading and once initiated rejecting your identity is not straightforward. Tom Mota remains concerned about his identity in relation to the advertising agency Ferris describes in the novel. The passage begins as the narrator explains Tom’s actual intentions to ‘take the piss’ out of his ex-colleagues; to him these actions are part of an absurd practical joke. The very real fears and anxieties of Tom’s targets come from their belief that Tom does in fact mean them harm and the weapon he is cradling contains actual bullets. As Tom’s main targets are individualised by the narrator a central quality of the office mentality emerges, a distinctive characteristic of each employee is used to differentiate them. These distinctions also communicate Tom’s motives for targeting each of the individuals, Jim Jackers is ‘an idiot’, Dan Wisdom is a ‘painter of fish’, and Marcia Dwyer is ‘the agency’s real ballbuster’. These synecdoches reaffirm the assertion later in the passage that states ‘how little’ these people ‘really [know each other]’, by engaging only superficially and for business related purposes they remain a mystery to one another. Frequently in this passage, as throughout the entire novel, Ferris adopts a first person plural narrati... ... middle of paper ... ...entre of the passage and represents a kind of breaking point. He is frustrated and resentful about the effect his time at the advertising agency has had on him. The more docile and balanced colleagues may not be capable of behaviour this extreme but are likely to be as spiritually damaged by the confines of their working lives. Tom, despite being exceptionally unsuited to corporate life, has serious trouble removing himself from the situation. Although he returns in opposition to the workings of the agency, intent on belittling its practices, he remains engaged with its influence and in many ways defeats his own purpose. Tom’s struggle in this passage is made absurd and darkly comical for literary effect. It concerns itself with the need to rebuild an identity outside of a framework that has been a part of the individual for long enough that it has become integral.

Open Document