Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
reasons why animal cloning should be banned
effects of science in modern world
ethical and moral issues of cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: reasons why animal cloning should be banned
Cloning Humans
Cloning is the process of duplicating a genetically identical organism
through non-sexual means. Cloning can be done with plants animals
including human, but it had been success with only plants and animals
not human, since there are some argument going on about is it right or
wrong to clone human (which is actually what this essay is all about).
The first cloned mammal is a sheep named 'Dolly' in 1997.The
scientists had cloned other animals, such as cows and mice. There are
some discussions about cloning; some people say cloning is dangerous.
In my opinion, I think cloning is 'ok' because it will make the huge
leap of biological science knowledge and technology, it also probably
have a lot other benefits on medical, since we might be able to create
our spare parts for our bodies those have to be 'genetically' the same
to be replaced in order for healing.
From my research on this particular topic, there are some reasons to
support opinion that it is 'ok' to clone a human.
Firstly, we can create spare parts of our body incase that we lost or
injured some of them, or we can produce a source of cells for the
sufferings, to repair damaged part of the original body. In conditions
such as Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart attacks, where the cells
which make up part of the brain, pancreas and heart stop working
properly or died out. We need cloning because we can't pass cells from
a stronger and healthy person to the sufferers because the body's
immune system will attack the organ transplants from people who are
not a 'close match', they'll be rejected or in another word, 'killed'.
That's why we need cloning for th...
... middle of paper ...
... cure cancer. Scientists still do not know exactly how cells
differentiate into specific kinds of tissue, nor to they understand
why cancerous cells lose their differentiation. Cloning, at long last,
may be the key to understanding differentiation and cancer.
By cloning We may be able to produce effective genetic therapy against
cystic fibrosis. And we also may learn to grow nerves or the spinal
cord back again when they are injured. Quadriplegics might be able to
get out of their wheelchairs and walk again. Christopher Reeves, the
man who played Superman, might be able to walk again.
In conclusion, I'm still agree that it's ok to clone a human, but it
needs to have some policies of cloning to avoid mutation, cloning can
be good because of benefits mentioned all above or it can be harmful
because of this, Mutation!
Cloning, especially human cloning attracts increasingly more attention after the first mammal cloning animal Dolly born in 1997. Cloning is divided into two categories: therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. Therapeutic cloning is more related to tissue level cloning to transplant healthy cells and reproductive cloning is individual level cloning. Thus, the term cloning in this essay is used to describe both individual level and tissue level cloning. Public have different views. Some people support it because of its medical value, yet some people argue that it may bring many safety risks and moral problems. Hence, decisions ought to be made to identify the extent of cloning. Therefore, this essay introduces two major benefits of human cloning on disease therapy and analysis two arguments against it on safety and ethical issues.
How should we think about cloning as philosophers and feminists? Reproduction by cloning is not, in itself, morally inferior to human sexual reproduction. Moral criticism of cloning rests on condemnation of its "unnaturalness" or "impiety," but this kind of criticism should not persuade non-believers. I evaluate cloning in two phases. First, some hypothetical situations involving private choices about cloning are examined within a liberal framework. From this individualistic perspective, cloning appears no more morally problematic than sexual reproduction. A liberal feminist may welcome the possibility of human cloning as an expansion of the range of reproductive options open to women. The second phase argues for a shift in the framework of analysis in order to get a more complete evaluation of the ethical implications of human cloning, including questions of distributive justice and the ideology of reproduction.
Would clones understand themselves as creations or copies? Would cloning undermine the conception of a human being’s individuality? (Medicines’ Brave New World) Those are two of the most questioned aspects of human cloning. Everyone always wants to be their own person and have their own thought, basically, be as original as they can be. How original can you get when there’s someone out there thinking, doing, and looking exactly like you? Not very original, if you ask me. Human cloning, cloning of any kind, has been looked at as being creepy, scary, immoral, and in the most dismal way, exciting. Cloning of humans should be prohibited because it is offensive to the human life and religion.
Cloning humans has recently become a possibility. It is achieved by the production of a group of identical cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual (Grolier 220). It is not known when cloning humans really became a possibility, but it is known that there are two possible ways that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods almost at our fingertips, we must ask ourselves two very important questions: Can we do this, and should we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and ethical sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that society could actually experience. "It is much in the news. The public has been bombarded with newspaper articles, magazine stories, books, television shows, and movies as well as cartoons¡¨, writes Robert McKinnell, the author of Cloning: A Biologist Reports (24). Much of this information in these sources leads the public in the wrong direction and makes them wonder how easy it would be for everyone around them to be cloned. Bizarre ideas about cloning lie in many science fiction books and scare the public with their unbelievable possibilities. David Rorvik wrote a highly controversial book entitled In His Image. In it he describes the story of a wealthy man who decides to clone himself. He is successful in doing this and causes quite an uprise in his community. This book was written in the late seventies and even then, societies reaction to the issues of human cloning was generally a negative one. We face a problem today even greater than the one in this book and it involves the duplication of human beings in a society that has always been known for its diversity. The main issue as to whether or not human cloning is possible through the splitting of embryos began in 1993 when experimentation was done at George W...
When people think of the word cloning they think of evil scientist in a dark laboratory’s full of dangerous and scary instruments of science for conducting experiments, when actually the word clone means, “a cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived (Dictionary.com).” In the past 50 years the science community has made many discoveries such as the cures for different life threatening diseases, different techniques of approaching different types of cancer, and different uses for the practice of cloning. Different people have many opinions about cloning. Some people in the medical field support the practice of cloning, because they believe it can help cure certain diseases by watching how they develop during the cloning process. But some people in the medical field do not support the practice of cloning, because they feel as if it is just a waste of time, and waste of money. Other people do not support the practice of cloning for religious reasons; because they feel as if things are suppose to live once and if a once living organism is artificially reproduced then it is defying the divine grace of God.
In order to have a legitimate argument for the reasoning why cloning is or is not acceptable it is important first to be understand what exactly the topic is about. The first thing that must be understood is that there are actually different types of cloning that serve different purposes because each type focuses on a specific goal. The first area of cloning is DNA cloning which is the copying of genes to better understand how they work and find cures for genetic malfunctions. DNA cloning is, perhaps, the oldest of the three types of cloning with it being around since the 1970’s (Cloning Fact Sheet, 2009). This form of cloning is the most widely accepted form since it does not cross into the realm of human cloning which is one of the largest debates that exists. One of the things that DNA cloning can accomplish is curing genetic malfunctions, by placing a cloned copy of the correct gene into the body via a virus that will replicate in the body and there for take the place of the faulty genes. H...
Human cloning is ridiculous. There are several definitions of cloning. Cloning is a breed specimens as a clone. Cloning is also to create an identical copy of something, or is a replicate. There are several reasons that cloning should not exist.
Imagine a future where humans are manufactured, a future where humans are created by science, a future where humans are the new lab specimen. Human cloning is like opening Pandora's Box, unleashing a torrent of potential evils but at the same time bringing a small seed of hope. No matter how many potential medical and scientific benefits could be made possible by human cloning, it is unethical to clone humans.
Cloning is on many scientists’ minds now a day. Many TV shows, and past movies have had some sort of cloning shown, or at least have had a reference to it. There has been major research done about every single type of cloning, or the health risks that come along with cloning. Some scientists say that, cloning should not be allowed be it takes up a lot of time, and most of the time requires luck (NBC News, 2014). Despite the negativity cloning gets from scientists and people, my opinion is that cloning should be allowed and eventually in the long run will help the human race. Cloning is not currently allowed, but should be allowed for medical research, population growth of the intelligent, and to be available for new scientific discovery.
Due to such negative reactions towards cloning the public is never given the opportunity to actually go into depth about what exactly cloning does. There are two types of cloning, one of the two, “reproductive cloning is when the creation of an individual has identical genetic material to an existing being” (Bargalow). In comparison, therapeutic cloning is the removal of genetic material to clone and mend a patient's cells, organs, or
Secondly, “the most the human race has to loose by playing around with cloning is that the genetic diversity would be lost (Andrea Castro, 2005).” Reducing the genetic differences will produce clones that are grossly overlarge, many animals will be born with genetic mutations, and there will be a higher “risk of disease transfer (Saskaschools, 2003). “A review of all the world's cloned animals suggests that every one of them is genetically and physically defective (Leake, 2002).” Mutations will be passed on to the younger generation because if a cloned species has a mutation in their DNA this mutation will be passed on. Cloning has been linked with diseases of ageing, arthritis and, cancer.
Cloning, specifically cloning humans, can be a very beneficial field of research. The science in embryonic cloning has progressed a long way since the release of therapeutic cloning practices and the birth of cloned organism. The processes opens new opportunities in the fields of medicine, scientific research, and has several uses in the future when there are more advanced practices that are even more efficient and safer with fewer restrictions. None of these ideas are very far fetched, cloning can be a great thing in mere years.
1) Robertson, John A. “Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.
However, “The key ethical issue with therapeutic cloning is the moral status of the cloned embryo, which is created solely for destruction. The ethical issues with reproductive cloning include genetic damage to the clone, health risks to the mother, very low success rate meaning loss of large numbers of embryos and fetuses, psychological harm to the clone, complex altered familial relationships, and commodification of human life.” (Cloning, 2013) Although we may be helping people here on earth who are in need of certain bodily organs just like any medical procedure it includes several risks. It is also fairly new and few if any cases of attempting to clone humans has been
Cloning is a very important scientific and medical discovery. Therapeutic cloning especially. Therapeutic cloning is the production of stem cells for organ and tissue repair. The stem cells would be provided from an almost exact clone of the person. There are types of cloning that are banned though, such as reproductive cloning (the production of genetically identical individuals) as of 1996, and no cloning is allowed to receive federal/government funding in the United States of America. While some cloning is bad or unrealistic, one type of cloning that should be allowed is therapeutic cloning for medicinal reasons and it needs more money to be researched.